Karnataka govt warned: Don't pass domestic workers Bill without consulting workers

By A Representative

The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) and members of the All-India Workers Forum have submitted preliminary comments to the Karnataka Labour Department on the Draft Karnataka Domestic Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Bill, 2025, urging the government to strengthen rights-based provisions and ensure wider public consultation. The submission was made on November 15 in response to the state’s call for public comments on the draft law.

NAPM welcomed the government’s initiative to bring a legal framework for the protection and welfare of domestic workers, one of the largest and most vulnerable segments of the informal workforce. The alliance stated that domestic workers have powered households and the economy through largely invisible labour, yet continue to face exploitation and exclusion due to the absence of legal safeguards. It said the bill’s introduction acknowledges decades of organizing and union struggles by domestic workers across Karnataka and India.

However, NAPM expressed deep disappointment that the draft bill has been published only in English and has not been made available in Kannada, despite repeated demands from unions. The organisation said it is unjust and undemocratic to close the consultation window without providing the bill in the state’s official language, which prevents meaningful engagement by lakhs of domestic workers, the majority of whom are women from socially and economically marginalized communities.

The alliance has called on the Karnataka government to immediately publish the full translated Kannada version of the bill, extend the deadline for public comments to at least December 31, 2025, and hold open district and taluka-level consultations with domestic workers unions, women’s organizations and civil society groups. It urged the government to incorporate feedback from workers’ collectives before finalizing the legislation.

NAPM also submitted detailed section-wise recommendations, arguing that the bill must expand the range of rights guaranteed to domestic workers, including the right to collective bargaining, protection against discrimination, and safeguards against arbitrary punishment. The submission proposed replacing prohibitive language on employment agreements with a mandate requiring employers to formalize contracts, ensuring workers are not penalized for lapses in registration processes, and strengthening responsibilities of the state in regulating working conditions, wages, leave, and grievance redressal. NAPM recommended restructuring the welfare board, ensuring district-level boards and mechanisms for social audits, and suggested shifting from criminal to civil penalties in most circumstances.

The alliance proposed that the bill be renamed as the Karnataka Domestic Workers (Recognition of Rights, Entitlements & Social Security) Bill, 2025, to reflect a stronger rights-based approach and called for comprehensive financial planning and public data transparency.

NAPM stated that the All-India Workers Forum brings together informal-sector labour unions including domestic workers and that NAPM itself is a three-decade-old non-party platform of progressive peoples’ movements. The submission was copied to the Chief Minister, Labour Minister and Chief Secretary of Karnataka, expressing hope that the government will consider the demands in “right earnest.”

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog