Skip to main content

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* 
Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.
Parenti argued that political systems should be analysed through the lenses of class, power, and historical struggle. Drawing on Marxist and Leninist traditions, he maintained that scholarship should remain accountable to material social realities rather than institutional or professional considerations. His critiques of imperialist wars and U.S. foreign interventions were central to his public work and contributed to both his recognition and marginalisation within academic institutions.
Born on September 30, 1933, in New York City, Parenti grew up in a working-class family. He often described how his early experiences shaped his political outlook. He earned a PhD in political science from Yale University and later taught political science and history at several universities. He also lectured widely across North America and internationally and authored numerous books aimed at both academic and general audiences.
In May 1970, while serving as an associate professor at the University of Illinois, Parenti participated in a campus protest following the killing of four students by the National Guard at Kent State University. During the protest, he was arrested and charged with aggravated battery of a state trooper, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest. Despite witness testimony contradicting the charges, he was convicted. Following this episode, Parenti took up a position at the University of Vermont. Although his department voted unanimously to renew his contract, the university’s board of trustees declined to do so, citing “unprofessional conduct,” reportedly under pressure from state legislators. He did not secure a permanent academic position thereafter and later stated that his political views and activism had affected his academic career.
Throughout his career, Parenti produced a substantial body of work examining capitalism, fascism, imperialism, media, religion, and historical interpretation. Among his most widely cited books are “Democracy for the Few”, “Inventing Reality: The Politics of News Media”, “Against Empire”, “The Culture Struggle”, “The Assassination of Julius Caesar”, and “Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism”. In these works, he argued that political and economic power in capitalist societies is concentrated among elites and that media institutions often function in ways that reinforce existing power structures.
In “Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism”, published in 1997, Parenti analysed fascism and communism in the twentieth century, rejecting the idea that they represented equivalent forms of totalitarianism. He argued instead that fascism historically emerged as a response to crises within capitalism, while communist movements represented attempts to challenge capitalist domination. The book also examined the consequences of the collapse of the Soviet Union, which Parenti viewed as a loss for global working-class movements.
Following the dissolution of the USSR, Parenti continued to defend the historical record of state-socialist societies against what he regarded as one-sided or hostile interpretations in Western media and scholarship. He argued that despite significant bureaucratic inefficiencies and political repression, the Soviet Union achieved large-scale advances in education, healthcare, employment, and social equality. He maintained that the end of the USSR did not reflect popular will but was driven by sections of the political leadership. Parenti viewed the post-1956 period as one of gradual ideological and political weakening that ultimately contributed to the system’s collapse.
Parenti was also critical of left-wing intellectual traditions that rejected or distanced themselves from existing socialist experiments. He argued that such critiques often aligned, intentionally or not, with broader anti-communist narratives. In his writings, he maintained that revolutionary movements should be evaluated within their historical and material constraints rather than against abstract or idealised standards.
In his analysis of post-Mao China, Parenti argued that the country had moved toward a form of state-directed capitalism. While acknowledging rapid industrial growth, he criticised the expansion of market mechanisms, pointing to rising inequality, labour exploitation, environmental degradation, and the partial privatisation of social services, including healthcare. He contended that these developments represented a departure from earlier socialist policies.
Despite operating largely outside mainstream academic institutions for much of his later life, Parenti continued to write, lecture, and engage with political movements concerned with war, inequality, and social justice. His work remains influential among scholars, activists, and readers interested in critical political economy and alternative interpretations of modern history.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket:  1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".