Skip to main content

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* 
Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.
Parenti argued that political systems should be analysed through the lenses of class, power, and historical struggle. Drawing on Marxist and Leninist traditions, he maintained that scholarship should remain accountable to material social realities rather than institutional or professional considerations. His critiques of imperialist wars and U.S. foreign interventions were central to his public work and contributed to both his recognition and marginalisation within academic institutions.
Born on September 30, 1933, in New York City, Parenti grew up in a working-class family. He often described how his early experiences shaped his political outlook. He earned a PhD in political science from Yale University and later taught political science and history at several universities. He also lectured widely across North America and internationally and authored numerous books aimed at both academic and general audiences.
In May 1970, while serving as an associate professor at the University of Illinois, Parenti participated in a campus protest following the killing of four students by the National Guard at Kent State University. During the protest, he was arrested and charged with aggravated battery of a state trooper, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest. Despite witness testimony contradicting the charges, he was convicted. Following this episode, Parenti took up a position at the University of Vermont. Although his department voted unanimously to renew his contract, the university’s board of trustees declined to do so, citing “unprofessional conduct,” reportedly under pressure from state legislators. He did not secure a permanent academic position thereafter and later stated that his political views and activism had affected his academic career.
Throughout his career, Parenti produced a substantial body of work examining capitalism, fascism, imperialism, media, religion, and historical interpretation. Among his most widely cited books are “Democracy for the Few”, “Inventing Reality: The Politics of News Media”, “Against Empire”, “The Culture Struggle”, “The Assassination of Julius Caesar”, and “Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism”. In these works, he argued that political and economic power in capitalist societies is concentrated among elites and that media institutions often function in ways that reinforce existing power structures.
In “Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism”, published in 1997, Parenti analysed fascism and communism in the twentieth century, rejecting the idea that they represented equivalent forms of totalitarianism. He argued instead that fascism historically emerged as a response to crises within capitalism, while communist movements represented attempts to challenge capitalist domination. The book also examined the consequences of the collapse of the Soviet Union, which Parenti viewed as a loss for global working-class movements.
Following the dissolution of the USSR, Parenti continued to defend the historical record of state-socialist societies against what he regarded as one-sided or hostile interpretations in Western media and scholarship. He argued that despite significant bureaucratic inefficiencies and political repression, the Soviet Union achieved large-scale advances in education, healthcare, employment, and social equality. He maintained that the end of the USSR did not reflect popular will but was driven by sections of the political leadership. Parenti viewed the post-1956 period as one of gradual ideological and political weakening that ultimately contributed to the system’s collapse.
Parenti was also critical of left-wing intellectual traditions that rejected or distanced themselves from existing socialist experiments. He argued that such critiques often aligned, intentionally or not, with broader anti-communist narratives. In his writings, he maintained that revolutionary movements should be evaluated within their historical and material constraints rather than against abstract or idealised standards.
In his analysis of post-Mao China, Parenti argued that the country had moved toward a form of state-directed capitalism. While acknowledging rapid industrial growth, he criticised the expansion of market mechanisms, pointing to rising inequality, labour exploitation, environmental degradation, and the partial privatisation of social services, including healthcare. He contended that these developments represented a departure from earlier socialist policies.
Despite operating largely outside mainstream academic institutions for much of his later life, Parenti continued to write, lecture, and engage with political movements concerned with war, inequality, and social justice. His work remains influential among scholars, activists, and readers interested in critical political economy and alternative interpretations of modern history.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”