Delhi university bans all protests on campus for one month, sparking free speech outcry

By A Representative

The University of Delhi's Office of the Proctor issued an order today prohibiting all public meetings, processions, demonstrations, and protests within the university campus for a period of one month, drawing immediate criticism from student activists and civil liberties advocates who have called it a direct assault on constitutional freedoms. Wonders Right to Education activist Mitra Ranjan, why shouldn't the order be seen as contradicting the need for democratisation of people's rights, university campuses and education and an attack on freedom of expression.

The order, bearing reference number PCTO/2026/ and signed by the Proctor on February 17, 2026, states that the ban has been necessitated by information suggesting that unrestricted public gatherings "may lead to obstruction of traffic, threats to human life, and disturbance of public peace." The administration further cited past instances where organisers had allegedly failed to control protests that escalated and spread widely, resulting in what the order described as "deterioration of law and order within the University campuses."

Among the most contentious provisions of the order is a prohibition on the assembly of five or more persons, a clause that activists say effectively criminalises ordinary student gatherings entirely. The order also bans the carrying of hazardous materials including mashals, beacons, and torches, the shouting of slogans, the making of speeches, and any activity deemed to affect the "general tranquillity of the public or the smooth flow of traffic." Critics have noted that the vagueness of this last provision grants university authorities sweeping discretionary power that could be selectively deployed against dissenting voices while leaving other gatherings undisturbed.

The university has justified the order in part by referencing a police order issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sub-Division Civil Lines, dated December 26, 2025, under longstanding Ministry of Home Affairs notifications from 1978 and 2010. By anchoring its ban to an existing police directive, the university effectively extends a law enforcement prohibition into an academic space — a move that free speech advocates argue fundamentally contradicts the university's own purpose as a site of open inquiry and debate.

Student groups are expected to challenge the order on constitutional grounds, pointing to Article 19(1)(a) and Article 19(1)(b) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantee citizens the rights to freedom of speech and expression and to assemble peaceably without arms. Legal observers note that any restriction on these rights must satisfy the constitutional test of being reasonable and proportionate. An outright ban on all protest activity, they argue, fails that test comprehensively, amounting to prior restraint — the suppression of speech before any actual harm has occurred rather than in response to it.

The absence of any specific triggering incident named in the order has further fuelled suspicion among activists, who question why the administration chose this particular moment to enforce such a sweeping restriction. The order comes into force immediately and will remain in effect for one month unless withdrawn earlier, with no independent appeal mechanism or judicial oversight built into its framework. Critics warn that such temporary orders have a tendency to be renewed indefinitely, and that the burden of withdrawal rests entirely with the same authority that issued the ban.

The University of Delhi has long been one of India's most politically active campuses, with a student union history stretching back decades and a tradition of engagement with national political movements. For many who have passed through its gates, the image of a campus where five students cannot gather without risking sanction represents not a preservation of order, but an abandonment of the university's fundamental identity. The order has been issued with the approval of what the document describes as the "Competent Authority," though no further detail is provided as to who that authority is or what process preceded the decision.

Comments

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

By A Representative A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

By Rajiv Shah This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan* A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .

India’s foreign policy at crossroads: Cost of silence in the face of aggression

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Sandeep Pandey The widely anticipated yet unprovoked attack on Iran on March 1 by the United States and Israel has drawn sharp criticism from several quarters around the world. Reports indicate that the strikes have resulted in significant civilian casualties, including 165 elementary school girls, 20 female volleyball players, and many other civilians.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Search This Blog