By Bharat Dogra On May 18, in a highly welcome step, the Supreme Court of India expressed serious reservations about various aspects of its earlier judgment in January refusing bail to former JNU student leader Umar Khalid and co-accused Sharjeel Imam, including the effective foreclosure of their right to seek bail for a year. At the time his bail plea was rejected, Umar Khalid had already spent over five years in prison as an undertrial.
Counterview
Open Forum for News and Views