Skip to main content

Hate speeches decline in 2025, but remain potent tool for divisive politics: CSSS report

By A Representative
 
A new report from the Centre for Study of Society and Secularism (CSSS) reveals a 47% drop in documented hate speeches targeting religious minorities in India last year, yet warns that the phenomenon persists as a deliberate strategy to fuel Islamophobia and majoritarian narratives. Authored by Irfan Engineer, Neha Dabhade, and Diya Padalkar, the study – titled Hate Speeches in 2025: A Weapon to Legitimize Divisive Narratives – analyzed reports from five major Mumbai-based newspapers and found 65 instances of hate speech, down from 122 in 2024.
"While our monitoring data indicates a decline or relatively low incidence of recorded hate speeches, it would be analytically unsound to interpret this as evidence that hate speech is no longer a serious concern in India," the authors write in the report. They attribute the lower figures not to a genuine reduction, but to methodological constraints, including reliance on print media alone. Broader monitoring efforts, such as those by India Hate Lab, documented over 1,300 in-person hate speech events in 2025, highlighting potential underreporting.
The report defines hate speech per the UN's framework as “any kind of communication in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are.” In India, it references sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – including 196 (promoting enmity between groups), 299 (outraging religious feelings), and 302 (wounding religious sentiments) – which carry penalties of up to three years' imprisonment.
A stark finding is the dominance of state actors in perpetuating hate: 53 of the 65 instances (81%) were delivered by Union ministers, state ministers, governors, and elected representatives. Non-state actors accounted for just 12 cases. "The reiteration of such narratives by actors in power not only legitimizes prejudice but also embeds discriminatory rhetoric within mainstream political discourse," Engineer, Dabhade, and Padalkar observe, emphasizing how these speeches dehumanize Muslims through tropes like "ghuspetiya" (infiltrators) and unsubstantiated claims of demographic conspiracies.
Leading the list was Maharashtra's Minister for Fisheries and Port Development, Nitesh Rane, with 10 instances, followed by Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath (6), and Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and Union Home Minister Amit Shah (5 each). Prime Minister Narendra Modi was cited for three speeches. Of the total, 61 targeted Muslims, with only four against Hindus.
Geographically, BJP-ruled or coalition states bore the brunt: 83% of incidents (54 out of 65) occurred in such regions. Maharashtra topped the list with 17 cases, followed by Uttar Pradesh (13), Assam (10), and Bihar (9). "Most of the hate speeches specifically directed against Muslims were reported in BJP-ruled states," the authors note, with Maharashtra (16), Uttar Pradesh (13), Assam (9), Bihar (8), and Delhi (4) seeing the highest concentrations.
The report's most alarming revelation is the near-total lack of accountability. "A salient observation based on the data is that little or next to no action has been taken against individuals making hate speeches targeting Muslims or Christians," state Engineer, Dabhade, and Padalkar. Out of 65 anti-Muslim speeches, state action was initiated in only 11 cases – and even then, often without meaningful follow-through.
CSSS categorizes state responses into three types. First, speeches critical of BJP policies or Hindu icons are swiftly labeled hate speech and prosecuted, despite not meeting legal thresholds. Examples include a Bihar JDU MLA's academic comments on Aurangzeb (no action taken despite BJP demands) and a Maharashtra man's WhatsApp post on Shivaji Maharaj (FIR under BNS Sections 299, 356(2), and 352).
Second, the bulk of documented speeches – inciting enmity against Muslims via terms like "love jihad," "land jihad," or calls for economic boycotts – faced zero repercussions. High-profile examples include Yogi Adityanath likening mosque surveys to "surgery on a wound" (Uttar Pradesh), Nitesh Rane urging Hindus to boycott uncertified Muslim mutton shops and demanding a ban on Tablighi Jamaat's Ijtema as a "terrorist organization," and Himanta Biswa Sarma warning of a "hidden conspiracy" by Bangladeshi migrants to make Assamese a minority.
Third, all four speeches targeting Hindus (e.g., vulgar remarks on Hindu symbols by Tamil Nadu's K. Ponmudy or Baba Ramdev's "sharbat jihad" comment) led to FIRs, court interventions, or apologies. In one case, Madhya Pradesh Tribal Affairs Minister Kanwar Vijay Shah's derogatory remark against a Muslim officer prompted Supreme Court oversight and an SIT probe.
The authors critique this disparity as evidence of systemic bias: "These speeches reproduce and reinforce long-standing Islamophobic tropes... framing Muslims as a monolithic and perpetual threat to Hindus and, by extension, to the Indian nation-state."
Engineer, Dabhade, and Padalkar caution against complacency, noting that hate speech's real toll – eroding social cohesion and justifying exclusion – transcends raw numbers. They highlight how narratives vilifying Mughal history or alleging Muslim disloyalty erase India's pluralistic heritage and rationalize surveillance.
The report urges stricter enforcement of BNS provisions and expanded monitoring beyond print media to capture social media and vernacular sources. "The apparent reduction must be understood in light of the specific methodological framework adopted by CSSS," they conclude, calling for civil society and media to amplify underrepresented voices.
CSSS, a Mumbai-based think tank, has tracked hate speech annually since 2014.

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket:  1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".