Skip to main content

Why 20 years later, Rang De Basanti feels less like cinema, more like warning

By Mohd Ziyaullah Khan* 
This Republic Day, the Rang De Basanti, starring Aamir Khan, completed 20 years since its release. I first watched it in a single-screen theatre in my city—at a time when multiplexes were only just beginning to appear and our town was still waiting for one. It remains my favourite film, and I often revisit it on OTT platforms or television around Independence Day or Republic Day, when the air is thick with rehearsed patriotism.
A few days ago, I noticed it streaming again on Jio Hotstar. Released in 2006, it is a film I have watched many times over the years. Yet, like all powerful cinema, returning to it at different stages of life offers a different experience. Twenty years ago, I found it deeply inspiring. In 2026, watching it again felt suffocating.
At its core, the film follows a group of Delhi University friends who challenge the might of the central government after one of their own, a flight lieutenant, is killed in a MiG aircraft crash allegedly caused by faulty spares. Director Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra interweaves India’s freedom struggle with contemporary politics, forcing viewers to confront a haunting question: what really separates a terrorist from a revolutionary? The film spoke directly to the simmering frustration of India’s youth at the time and offered at least a direction, if not a solution. “Koi bhi desh perfect nahi hota. Ussey perfect banana padta hai” was not merely a line of dialogue; it became a generational mantra.
Its enduring power lies in its characters, each representing a strand of Indian youth. DJ, loud and fearless, masks deep insecurity about his place in the real world: “Asli zindagi mein apne jaise logon ko koi nahi puchta.” Sukhi is the loyal follower, without a will of his own, yet steadfast in friendship. Karan Singhania, the privileged heir, burns through his father’s wealth while craving validation: “Baap ka paisa hai, padey padey sadd jaata hai.” Aslam Khan embodies the Indian Muslim youth—patriotic yet perpetually asked to prove it, caught between conservative expectations and genuine camaraderie. Sonia Chaudhary is modern, ambitious and brave, negotiating patriarchy without surrendering her agency. Lakshman Pandey begins as a misguided nationalist who equates religion with patriotism, only to realise he has been manipulated by politics. Sue, the outsider, struggles to comprehend India’s contradictions but falls deeply in love with its people; her remark, “Tum logon ko ladne ka sirf bahana chahiye,” still stings with uncomfortable accuracy.
The film portrayed systemic corruption, communal polarisation, the commerce of religion and the ruthless instinct of those in power to cling to office. Even its symbolism was sharp. The right-wing Home Minister in the story is named D. N. Godse—an allusion too deliberate to miss.
When I watched the film in 2006, I walked out of the theatre energised. Candlelight protests inspired by the so-called “RDB effect” filled public spaces and dominated headlines. In 2026, I struggle to hold back tears while watching the same scenes. Two decades later, it is painful to admit that much of what angered us then persists, while public outrage seems to dissipate faster. Candlelight vigils today barely register with the media.
The archetypes, too, appear to have hardened. The idealistic DJ seems replaced by organised vigilante groups. Lakshman’s confused nationalism finds echoes in street-level aggression carried out in the name of patriotism. Many Karans have retreated into comfort or left the country. Aslams often speak more cautiously, conscious of how quickly suspicion can be manufactured. Sukhis still follow, though the moral clarity that once guided them feels rarer. Sonia’s battles—over autonomy, work, expression—continue, now amplified and distorted by online abuse.
There was irony even in 2006. The Ministry of Defence initially raised objections to the film. A special screening was reportedly arranged for then Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee, who cleared it, remarking that his duty was to defend the country, not censor films. It is difficult not to wonder how such a moment would unfold today.
“Koi bhi desh perfect nahi hota” now feels like a fading echo. In today’s climate, one wonders whether a film like Rang De Basanti would be greenlit with the same ease, or embraced by major stars without hesitation. The question is less about censorship and more about atmosphere—the invisible boundaries that shape what stories get told and how.
And yet, to reduce the present entirely to despair would be unfair. Now and then, sparks of courage and solidarity appear in unexpected places—ordinary citizens who step forward to protect strangers, to speak up, to refuse hatred. They may not command prime-time attention, but they keep alive the possibility that the film once stirred in us.
This is not a movie review. Rang De Basanti remains a timeless work of cinema, as powerful today as it was in 2006. What has changed is not the film, but the country watching it—and perhaps the viewer within me. Twenty years ago, it ignited hope and the conviction that questioning power was an act of patriotism. Today, it leaves a tightening in the throat, a reminder of ideals tested and dreams deferred. That is not nostalgia speaking; it is reckoning—a reflection on what we once believed we could become, and the distance we still have to travel.
---
*Freelance content writer & editor based in Nagpur; co-founder, TruthScape

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

India’s foreign policy at crossroads: Cost of silence in the face of aggression

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Sandeep Pandey  The widely anticipated yet unprovoked attack on Iran on March 1 by the United States and Israel has drawn sharp criticism from several quarters around the world. Reports indicate that the strikes have resulted in significant civilian casualties, including 165 elementary school girls, 20 female volleyball players, and many other civilians. 

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan*  A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".