Skip to main content

Territorial greed of Trump, Xi Jinping, and Putin could make 2026 toxic

By N.S. Venkataraman* 
The year 2025 closed with bloody conflicts across nations and groups, while the United Nations continued to appear ineffective—reduced to a debate forum with little impact on global peace and harmony.  
As the world steps into 2026, people everywhere hope for respite and renewal. Yet such optimism seems misplaced. Donald Trump of the United States, Xi Jinping of China, and Vladimir Putin of Russia appear determined to pursue territorial expansion with little regard for international order or responsibility. Their ambitions threaten to make 2026 another year of turmoil.  
Millions across the globe—including citizens of China, Russia, and the United States—are disillusioned. Territorial greed and the wars it provokes ultimately devastate ordinary families, not the leaders who instigate them. The policies of these three men stand in stark defiance of the principles of peace championed by Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, and other global icons.  
Xi Jinping’s Expansionism
China’s territorial ambitions are neither new nor restrained. In 1950, Beijing invaded Tibet, massacring thousands who resisted. Since then, Tibet has remained under a suffocating grip, denied freedom and free speech.  
In 1962, China launched war against India, seizing thousands of kilometers of territory in Ladakh. Today, it continues to claim Arunachal Pradesh as its own. Beyond India, China disputes ownership of the Senkaku Islands, asserts control over the South China Sea, and now threatens to invade Taiwan.  
China’s appetite for land appears limitless.  
Putin’s War
In 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine under the pretext of NATO expansion. The war drags on with no end in sight, and Moscow openly declares it will not vacate occupied territories.  
This conflict is a stark exhibition of Putin’s territorial greed, pursued at the cost of countless lives and global stability.  
Trump’s Claims
Donald Trump’s rhetoric and actions have shocked the world. He once declared that Canada should become the 51st state of the United States. More recently, he invaded Venezuela, citing drug trafficking as justification, and proclaimed himself “acting president” of the country.  
Trump has also laid claim to Greenland, arguing that U.S. security requires its annexation to prevent Russian or Chinese influence. These moves reveal not strategy but insatiable greed. What his next target might be remains uncertain, but the pattern is unmistakable.  
What Lies Ahead in 2026
Wars and conflicts have long scarred human history, often rooted in local disputes. What distinguishes today’s crises is the scale of territorial greed driving them.  
With Trump, Xi, and Putin entrenched in power, their ambitions will continue to sow seeds of war. To expect 2026 to be more peaceful than 2025 would be naïve.  
Voices of peace resound across the world, but they remain cries in the wilderness. The territorial greed of these leaders is so entrenched that they are unlikely to heed the wisdom of Gandhi, King, or Mandela.  
Many observers now conclude that the absence of war is a utopian dream. As long as leaders wield economic and military strength to pursue expansion, conflicts will persist. Trump, Xi, and Putin exemplify this grim reality.  
---  
Trustee, Nandini Voice for the Deprived, Chennai 

Comments

TRENDING

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By  A  Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”