Skip to main content

Rights body seeks action against Assam chief minister over minority remarks

By A Representative
 
The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has called for the resignation of Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, alleging that he has repeatedly violated his constitutional oath by making divisive and inflammatory statements targeting religious minorities in the state.
In a press statement, PUCL President Kavita Srivastava and General Secretary Dr. V. Suresh accused the Chief Minister of undermining the rule of law and breaching his oath of office to govern “without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.” The organisation said it was “deeply alarming” that a constitutionally elected Chief Minister was allegedly inciting hostility against Muslims and Christians, thereby violating the constitutional principles of equality and secularism.
The civil liberties group cited several past remarks attributed to Sarma, including his repeated use of the term “jihad” in reference to issues involving the Muslim community. It referred to statements made in August 2024 in which the Chief Minister allegedly accused the University of Science and Technology, Meghalaya, a Muslim-run institution, of engaging in “flood jihad” and blamed it for floods in Guwahati. PUCL also mentioned his claim that the university had a “Mecca-like structure,” which he allegedly described as symbolic of “jihad.” Additionally, the organisation referred to remarks in which Bengali Muslim farmers were accused of practising “land and fertiliser jihad” by using high quantities of fertilisers.
As Assam prepares for the 2026 state Assembly elections, PUCL alleged that the Chief Minister has intensified his rhetoric against Bengali-speaking Muslims, particularly those referred to as “Miyas.” The statement cited comments attributed to Sarma indicating that between four to five lakh “Miya voters” would be removed from the electoral rolls during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. It also referred to a speech dated January 28, 2025, in which the Chief Minister allegedly encouraged discriminatory behaviour against the community, including remarks suggesting that they should be “troubled” so that they would leave Assam.
PUCL further raised concern over a video circulated on February 8, 2026, described as the “point-blank video,” which purportedly showed the Chief Minister aiming and firing a rifle at images of two individuals, one wearing a skullcap and another with a beard. The wall in the background reportedly bore the words “No mercy.” According to PUCL, the video was later removed from the social media page of the BJP’s Assam unit following public outrage. The organisation claimed that the video reinforced what it described as a pattern of inflammatory rhetoric against Bengali Muslims and warned that such messaging could inflame tensions and potentially lead to violence.
The statement said that despite the deletion of the video, the Chief Minister’s past remarks amounted to repeated violations of his constitutional oath to “faithfully and conscientiously discharge” his duties and to “do right to all manner of people in accordance with the Constitution and the law without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.”
PUCL also referred to a police complaint filed by former civil servant and social activist Harsh Mander at the Hauz Khas police station in New Delhi. Mander sought registration of an FIR against the Chief Minister under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including provisions related to promoting enmity between groups, making assertions prejudicial to national integration, malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings, and statements conducing to public mischief. According to PUCL, the complaint was based on public statements allegedly made by Sarma on January 27, accusing him of promoting hatred and discrimination against Bengali-speaking Muslims.
The organisation also cited the Chief Minister’s response to the complaint, in which he reportedly said that he would file multiple cases against Mander and accused him of undermining the National Register of Citizens (NRC) process in Assam. Sarma has previously alleged that Mander attempted to influence the NRC process by helping include ineligible applicants.
Defending Mander, PUCL highlighted his long association with rights-based work, including his role as Special Commissioner appointed by the Supreme Court in the Right to Food case (PUCL v Union of India). The statement noted his involvement in documenting conditions in Assam’s detention centres and proceedings before Foreigners Tribunals, as well as his advocacy for homeless persons and victims of hate crimes. It alleged that he has faced investigations by agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate, CBI and Income Tax Department in connection with his activism.
PUCL described the Chief Minister’s remarks as a “complete repudiation” of his oath of office and accused him of promoting divisiveness rather than fraternity. It contended that his statements demonstrate an unwillingness to govern on behalf of all communities in Assam, particularly Muslims, thereby undermining the constitutional mandate of equality before law.
Calling him a “serial violator” of constitutional norms, PUCL demanded that Sarma resign from office. The organisation also urged the Prime Minister to take action under Article 355 of the Constitution to ensure that the state is governed in accordance with constitutional provisions.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.