Skip to main content

Budget 2026–27: Higher welfare outlays mask poor spending efficiency

By A Representative
 
The Union Budget 2026–27 presents a mixed picture for welfare spending, with higher allocations for several social sectors but continuing concerns over reduced actual expenditure and weak implementation, according to an analysis by the Pathey Budget Center. 
The study, authored by budget analyst Mahender Jethmalani, compares budget estimates for 2026–27 with revised estimates for 2025–26 across key welfare categories including the Gender Budget, Child Budget, Scheduled Caste Plan and Tribal Sub-Plan.
The analysis shows that revised estimates for 2025–26 were substantially lower than the original budget estimates across most social sectors, indicating a rollback in spending on programmes meant for women, children and marginalised communities. 
The Gender Budget Part A, which includes schemes with 100 per cent allocation for women and girls, recorded the steepest cut, with revised estimates lower by ₹30,158 crore, a reduction of nearly 29 per cent. Only about 71 per cent of the allocated amount was likely to be spent, with major cuts seen in housing schemes such as PM Awas Yojana in both urban and rural areas, as well as Mission Shakti.
The Child Budget Part A also saw a reduction of ₹8,735 crore in the revised estimates for 2025–26, amounting to a cut of around 10 per cent. Key schemes related to education and nutrition, including PM SHRI Schools and PM Poshan, were affected. 
In contrast, the Scheduled Caste Plan and the Tribal Sub-Plan showed relatively strong spending efficiency, utilising 96 per cent and 95 per cent of their allocations respectively, despite facing cuts of over ₹7,000 crore each at the revised estimate stage.
Commenting on the findings, Mahender Jethmalani said the trend highlights a growing gap between budgetary intent and actual delivery. “While the Budget Estimates for 2026–27 indicate increased allocations for most social categories, the critical issue remains execution. Repeated reductions at the revised estimate stage dilute the impact of welfare commitments,” he said.
The analysis also points to serious underutilisation in certain tribal-focused programmes. The Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan spent only 36 per cent of its allocated funds, while the Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya Adivasi Nyaya Maha Abhiyan utilised around 63 per cent. 
Despite an overall increase in allocations for the Scheduled Caste Plan and Tribal Sub-Plan in the 2026–27 Budget, the Pradhan Mantri Janjatiya scheme is the only category to witness a significant reduction compared to the previous year’s budget estimate.

Comments

TRENDING

New UPF study strengthens case for statutory controls on junk food advertising

Counterview News   A randomized controlled trial published in the journal Nature Metabolism has found that ultra-processed foods (UPFs) trigger metabolic and neural responses distinct from minimally processed foods—even when the two meals are nutritionally identical. The study provides direct experimental evidence that food processing itself influences health through mechanisms beyond calories and macronutrients alone.

Kamal Mitra Chenoy, scholar and student activist who never stopped being both

By Harsh Thakor*  Professor Kamal Mitra Chenoy, who taught comparative politics and the Indian Constitution at the School of International Studies (SIS), Jawaharlal Nehru University, died on October 11. He was 75. A political scientist and public intellectual, he was known for his work on international relations, peace and conflict resolution, human rights and democratic values, and for his solidarity with students.

From air pollution to nuclear war: Capitalism's seventeen deadly outputs

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  The Lancet Commission's report on "21st Century Global Threats to Health" identifies seventeen interconnected crises threatening life on Earth: air pollution, antimicrobial resistance, childhood malnutrition, the collapse of development and health assistance, conventional conflicts, high alcohol use, high blood pressure, income inequality, low educational attainment, the malicious use of AI, nuclear conflict, obesity, pandemics, poor mental health, smoking, and unhealthy aging.