Skip to main content

Bangladesh in turmoil: Rising insecurity, sectarian forces gain ground

By Bharat Dogra 
Many who initially welcomed the ouster of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina are now reconsidering their stance. The reasons are stark. Law and order has deteriorated sharply, leaving large sections of the population—particularly political opponents—deeply vulnerable. Minorities report growing insecurity, with disturbing incidents of targeted violence. Inter-faith harmony is under unprecedented strain, while prospects for fair elections are fading as major political parties, including those with strong minority support, face exclusion and obstruction.  
At the same time, sectarian and fundamentalist groups—long known for exploiting divisions and resorting to violence—are gaining strength. These forces played a central role in Hasina’s removal and continue to benefit from external backing. The involvement of foreign powers, often denouncing sectarian violence publicly while covertly supporting such groups for strategic ends, raises troubling questions. Former Prime Minister Hasina herself has pointed to the hand of foreign and sectarian forces in her ouster.  
The tragedy is compounded by the deaths of many protesters during the anti-Hasina movement. While some demonstrators may have genuinely sought a better future, the protests were largely shaped by regime-change operations, often manipulating sincere citizens without their awareness. History shows that such externally influenced movements, unlike genuine reform efforts, frequently unleash instability and violence.  
Bangladesh’s painful history underscores these dangers. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the nation’s founding leader and Hasina’s father, was assassinated along with most of his family by forces later revealed to have foreign and sectarian links. Hasina herself survived multiple assassination attempts.  
Yet, despite adversities, UN reports confirm that during much of Hasina’s tenure, Bangladesh achieved significant progress in human development indicators. Many successful initiatives emerged, though in her final years, positive achievements were overshadowed by a flood of negative narratives—a pattern seen in other regime-change operations.  
The current trajectory is deeply worrying. For South Asia, the path forward must rest on secularism, inter-faith harmony, minority protection, inclusive democracy, socio-economic equality, and environmental sustainability. Only such a vision can reduce distress and foster lasting welfare. Sadly, the region is drifting away from this ideal, casting a shadow of sadness across the subcontinent. Still, hope remains if citizens remain vigilant and committed to steering South Asia toward cooperation and justice.  
---
The writer is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Protecting Earth for Children, Man over Machine, When the Two Streams Met, and A Day in 2071

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”