Skip to main content

Gig workers’ strike halts platforms, union submits demands to Labour Ministry

By A Representative
 
India’s gig economy witnessed an partial disruption on December 31, 2025, as a large number of delivery workers, app-based service providers, and freelancers across the country participated in a nationwide strike called by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU). The strike, which followed days of coordinated protests, shut down major platforms including Zomato, Swiggy, Blinkit, Zepto, Flipkart, and BigBasket in several areas.
The women-led national union, GIPSWU, had earlier issued an urgent announcement urging “all gig workers, platform workers, digital platform workers, app-based workers, and online freelancers” to abstain from services on December 31 to make the strike “united and effective.” Union President Seema Singh emphasized that the collective action was “vital to assert our legitimate demands and to secure fair working conditions and social protection for all platform-based workers.”  
On the day of the strike, GIPSWU submitted a detailed memorandum to Union Labour Minister Mansukh Mandaviya, outlining 15 priority demands. The union argued that “Bharat can’t be Viksit until its workers, part of India’s booming economy, continue to be exploited.” The memorandum highlighted systemic exclusion of gig workers from core labour entitlements and constitutional guarantees, citing “pervasive harassment, discrimination, and violence against workers.”  
Among the demands were the discontinuation of 10–20-minute delivery mandates to prioritize worker safety, fixing minimum per-kilometer rates at ₹20+ and ensuring workplace safety for women, granting emergency leave and maternity protection to women service workers, eliminating arbitrary ID blocking and punitive rating systems, guaranteeing minimum monthly earnings of ₹40,000, abolishing peak hours and slot systems, compensating workers for customer-initiated cancellations, and legally recognizing platform workers as “workers” under labour laws rather than “partners.”
The memorandum also demanded the replacement of AI-based customer support with human support, the end of mandatory surveillance practices such as pre- and post-task photo uploads, and restoration of company hubs with safety provisions for women workers.  
In its submission, GIPSWU urged the government to convene tripartite discussions under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, bringing together workers, companies, and the state. “The Union Government is requested to extend full solidarity to the striking workers and address these demands urgently,” the memorandum stated. National Coordinator Nirmal Gorana added that the strike was “a reminder of the platform economy’s dependence on workers’ labour” and warned of “severe implications for India’s growth if these issues remain unaddressed.”  
The strike, which followed GIPSWU’s digital strike in 2024, disrupted services across major cities. Customers reported delays and cancellations, while delivery platforms acknowledged service interruptions. Worker groups in Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Ahmedabad, and Kolkata staged demonstrations, holding placards that read “No Viksit Bharat Without Workers” and “₹20 Per Kilometer Now.”  
As the strike concluded, GIPSWU reiterated its demand for immediate government intervention. “This escalation underscored the severe implications for India’s growth if these issues remain unaddressed,” the union declared. The memorandum closed with a request for an urgent meeting with the Labour Minister to present a national delegation and elaborate on the workers’ grievances.  

Comments

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.