Skip to main content

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative 
Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.
Workers who gathered peacefully said the memorandum reflects long-standing grievances that have remained unaddressed despite repeated representations. They pointed to unsafe working environments, especially for women, arbitrary blocking of worker IDs amounting to instant termination, opaque rating systems, heavy deductions, and declining earnings as key reasons behind the current unrest. The demands include a minimum monthly earning guarantee of ₹40,000, an end to arbitrary ID blocking, withdrawal of peak-hour and slot-based punitive systems, transparent ratings, proper human customer support and formal recognition of service providers as workers rather than “partners”.
Union leaders said the protest must be viewed in the context of mounting anger among gig workers nationwide, who increasingly feel trapped between algorithm-driven controls and the absence of legal recognition. Seema Singh, President of the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union, said women workers face particular hardship, noting that safety concerns are often ignored and even emergency leave during menstrual periods is difficult to obtain, with complaints sometimes resulting in penalties rather than redress. Such conditions, she said, have pushed many women workers to the brink and contributed to the wider mood of resistance in the sector.
Nirmal Gorana, Convener of the National Campaign Committee for Eradication of Bonded Labour, warned that the present gig work regime risks creating conditions akin to forced labour. Referring to India’s commitment under Sustainable Development Goal 8.7 to eradicate bonded labour by 2030, he said the goal would remain unattainable unless governments and platforms address the reality of platform-based work. He linked the current protest to similar actions by delivery riders, cab drivers and other app-based workers, arguing that strikes and collective actions are emerging because institutional dialogue has failed.
Individual workers echoed these concerns, with Gunjan, a service worker, saying her ID was blocked without explanation, effectively ending her livelihood overnight. She said thousands face similar actions without any avenue for appeal, a situation that has fuelled growing calls for collective resistance, including strike action, across platforms.
The memorandum submitted to Urban Company also raises issues such as unpaid customer cancellations, rigid service-level agreements, forced bundle bookings, mandatory photo uploads, compulsory product sales and lack of clarity in insurance coverage. Workers said these practices increase stress and costs while reducing actual take-home pay, deepening frustration and pushing more workers towards coordinated protests.
Union representatives said they are seeking dialogue with Urban Company management but warned that continued silence or inaction would only intensify mobilisation. With gig workers across cities increasingly coordinating actions and voicing their demands in public, Thursday’s protest in Gurugram is being seen as another signal that the platform economy is facing a critical moment, with workers demanding dignity, security and a fair share in a rapidly expanding sector.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”