Skip to main content

RTI framework ‘nuked’? SHANTI Bill triggers alarm, grants centre sweeping secrecy powers

By Rajiv Shah 
Has the Government of India finally moved to completely change important provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, that too without bringing about any amendment in the top transparency law? It would seem so, if one is to believe well known civil society leaders' keen observations on the nuclear energy Bill passed in the Lok Sabha
Senior RTI activist Amrita Johri has sharply criticised the recently passed Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill, 2025, saying that it has effectively “nuked” the Right to Information (RTI) Act through the back door. 
In a social media post, Johri wrote: “The RTI Act just got NUKED through the SHANTI bill—RTI amendments through the back door! SHANTI Bill empowers central government to create new categories of information which will be exempt from disclosure under the RTI Act. This completely destroys the RTI framework. Huge blow to sunshine law! #saverti.”
The SHANTI Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha during the ongoing Winter Session of Parliament by a voice vote amid a walkout by opposition parties, despite concerns raised by several Members of Parliament about its far-reaching implications. The legislation marks a major overhaul of India’s nuclear energy framework by opening the civil nuclear sector to private participation for the first time, repealing parts of older Acts including the Atomic Energy Act of 1962 and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010 to encourage investment and technological collaboration in the sector. 
A core point of contention highlighted by Johri and other transparency advocates lies in the Bill’s provisions on information disclosure. Under Section 39 of the Bill, the Central Government is empowered to declare any information not in the public domain that it deems “detrimental to national security or public interest” as restricted information. This restricted category can include, among other things: the location, quality and quantity of prescribed substances and transactions; processing, production or extraction of fissile material; the design, siting, construction and operation of nuclear power plants or reactors; and research and technological work on related materials or processes. Once declared restricted, such information is explicitly debarred from disclosure under the RTI Act, even though the RTI would normally apply to public authority records. 
Specific language quoted from the Bill states that “No person shall disclose or obtain … any restricted information” and that the Central Government may, by notification, prohibit the publication in any form whatsoever of restricted information.” It further provides that “notwithstanding anything contained in the Right to Information Act, 2005, the information declared as restricted information … shall be debarred from disclosure under the provisions of that Act.” 
Opposition members and civil society critics argue that by granting such sweeping discretionary powers to the executive and creating entirely new exemptions that override the RTI Act without amending it directly, the SHANTI Bill undermines years of work establishing India’s transparency regime. Activists like Johri say this will severely limit the public’s ability to scrutinise government policy and operations in a sector that, while sensitive, also has profound safety, environmental and economic implications.
The government, for its part, has defended the provisions as essential for national security and public safety, asserting that the existing RTI framework already provides for exemptions on sensitive information and that greater clarity is needed in the context of nuclear energy governance.
As the Bill now moves to the Rajya Sabha for further consideration, the debate is expected to intensify over the balance between transparency and what the powers-that-be consider security concerns in one of the allegedly most strategically important but controversial sectors of India’s economy and infrastructure.

Comments

TRENDING

Bihar’s land at ₹1 per acre for Adani sparks outrage, NAPM calls it crony capitalism

By A Representative   The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has strongly condemned the Bihar government’s decision to lease 1,050 acres of land in Pirpainti, Bhagalpur district, to Adani Power for a 2,400 MW coal-based thermal power project. 

An open letter to PM: Before you forgive, ask for forgiveness

By Martin Macwan*  Respected Prime Minister,  The first step toward true forgiveness is asking for it, and it is out of respect for the Constitution that the title "Honourable" is used for the office of the Prime Minister. Every abuse is "dirty" because almost all abuse is uttered with the conscious intention of publicly humiliating a woman, much like the disrobing of Draupadi in the royal court. This includes remarks like "Jersey Cow," used at public meetings on the Gujarati land of Gandhi and Sardar; comparing a female MP's laughter in India's Parliament to "Surpanakha's laugh"; and using a vulgar address like "Didi O Didi" for a Chief Minister who holds a respected position in a democracy—along with every other such remark. In the 79-year history of independent India, you are better placed than anyone to say which Prime Minister has used such language against women.

Women's groups, feminists hail wrestlers' courage, vow to continue fight after Brij Bhushan acquittal

By A Representative   In a powerful show of solidarity, more than 250 prominent feminists and members of women's organisations across India have condemned the acquittal of former BJP MP and ex-Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in the high-profile sexual harassment case filed by six women wrestlers. The signatories have expressed unwavering support for the wrestlers who have waged a courageous legal battle for justice against formidable odds.