Skip to main content

Women farmers’ group flags exclusion and job loss risks in VBGRAMG Bill

By A Representative 
Mahila Kisan Adhikar Manch (MAKAAM), a national platform of women farmers and rural workers, has strongly condemned the Union government for introducing and passing the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Grameen) Bill, 2025 (VBGRAMG), describing it as anti-women, anti-worker and anti-poor, and terming it a “deathblow” to rural livelihoods. 
In a statement, the organisation said the Bill was passed without adequate consultation and without incorporating the voices of those most affected, marking a decisive shift from a rights-based employment guarantee to a discretionary, budget-constrained scheme.
MAKAAM highlighted that women form the backbone of Indian agriculture, with nearly 80 percent of rural women workers engaged in the sector, largely as unpaid family labour, sharecroppers or agricultural labourers on small and marginal farms. The organisation noted that for many of these women, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) was not merely a welfare scheme but a legal right that allowed them access to paid work within their villages, enabling financial independence while balancing household responsibilities. 
It pointed out that more than 75 percent of women workers are either self-employed or unpaid helpers and continue to earn 20–30 percent less than men in agriculture, underscoring deep-rooted economic inequality.
According to MAKAAM, at a time when rural wages have stagnated or declined over the past decade, MGNREGA played a crucial role as a bargaining tool for women workers. The platform argued that by transforming a demand-driven programme into a supply-driven model, the VBGRAMG Bill would reinforce entrenched rural power structures and weaken women’s negotiating capacity in the labour market. 
It also emphasised that under the 2005 Act, women participated actively in planning and decision-making through Gram Sabhas, helping prioritise works such as water conservation, pond restoration and land development that supported sustainable and climate-resilient livelihoods. The replacement of this framework, the statement said, dismantles one of the few institutional spaces that enabled rural women’s agency in local governance.
The organisation further drew attention to what it described as technocratic exclusions that have already affected women workers in recent years, particularly due to digitised attendance systems and Aadhaar-linked payment mechanisms, which have resulted in large-scale exclusions because of poor connectivity and administrative failures in rural areas. 
Instead of addressing these issues, MAKAAM said, the new law introduces provisions that would further marginalise women, including a 60-day suspension period for work during peak agricultural seasons, centralised budget caps that effectively end the right to work once allocations are exhausted, and a 60:40 funding split that would place an additional financial burden on states, leading to fewer workdays and delayed wage payments.
MAKAAM warned that rural women farmers and workers are among the most vulnerable sections of the population in terms of food and nutrition security and accused successive governments of courting their votes while ignoring their voices in policymaking. The platform has appealed to the President of India to withhold assent to the VBGRAMG Bill and restore the legal employment guarantee under MGNREGA. 
It has also demanded that the government strengthen rural employment provisions by devolving greater planning powers to Gram Panchayats, ensuring payment of at least minimum wages directly to women without exclusionary technological barriers, and expanding access to quality rural employment in keeping with the stated goals of a “Viksit Bharat”.
Calling the passage of the Bill a betrayal, a representative of the platform said that millions of women who have worked the land for generations would not accept a system that converts a hard-won legal right into a discretionary state benefit.

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.