Skip to main content

Why Battleship Potemkin remains relevant: From Stalinist purges to the war on Ukraine

By Harsh Thakor* 
On December 21, a few days ago, we commemorated the centenary of one of the greatest films of the twentieth century—Sergei Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin. A landmark of Russian cinema, The Battleship Potemkin was first shown in Moscow on December 24, 1925. Yet its enduring appeal and relevance are evident in the countless homages paid by filmmakers over the century that followed. Few films have so powerfully stirred the souls of audiences.
Battleship Potemkin was a path-breaking experiment both aesthetically and politically, transcending realms previously unexplored in filmmaking. It stands as a masterpiece that successfully fuses political propaganda with revolutionary artistic technique. Through its classical yet radical structuring of episodes and meticulous dissection of scenes, the film achieves an intense and gripping navigation of human psychology in a moment of historical transition.
This great Soviet silent film profoundly influenced Hollywood and European cinema and continues to be taught in film schools worldwide as a model of cinematic innovation. In 1958, it was voted “the greatest film of all time” by an international panel of critics in Brussels. Pauline Kael famously observed that no other film had achieved such graphic power in its images, using “psychological stimulation” through montage.
Considering how primitive film technology was in 1925, modern audiences remain mesmerised by the impact of this black-and-white silent film. No one who has seen it can escape memories of the famous massacre on the Odessa Steps, particularly the unforgettable image of the baby carriage rolling helplessly down the steps. Potemkin was so effective in its jolting imagery and communist message that it was banned in the UK from 1926 to 1954, amid fears that it might inspire a workers’ uprising.
The Soviet government ordered the film, produced by Mosfilm, to mark the twentieth anniversary of the 1905 Potemkin uprising, which Lenin regarded as proof that sections of the armed forces could side with the proletarian revolution. Eisenstein believed that political revolution demanded a revolutionary aesthetic and a new cinematic language.
Following the success of his 1924 debut Strike, Eisenstein was commissioned in March 1925 to make a film commemorating the 1905 revolution. This widespread uprising, born of poor working conditions and deep social discontent, swept across the Russian Empire and challenged imperial autocracy. Although the revolt ultimately failed, its memory endured.
Originally titled The Year 1905, Eisenstein’s project was conceived as part of a nationwide cycle of commemorative events across the Soviet Union. The aim was to connect progressive moments of pre-1917 Russian history—especially the general strike of 1905—to the fabric of new Soviet life. The original screenplay dramatised ten distinct historical episodes, including Bloody Sunday, anti-Semitic pogroms, and the mutiny aboard the battleship Prince Potemkin.
Eisenstein
Principal photography began in the summer of 1925 but yielded little success. A frustrated Eisenstein moved the crew to the southern port city of Odessa, where he abandoned the episodic structure and refocused the film on a single event. The revised screenplay centred exclusively on June 1905, when sailors aboard the Prince Potemkin rebelled after being ordered to eat rotten, maggot-infested meat.
The mutiny and its aftermath were structured into five acts. The opening two acts and the concluding fifth closely followed historical events—the sailors’ rebellion and their eventual escape through a squadron of loyalist ships. The two central acts, depicting the solidarity of Odessa’s citizens with the mutineers, were largely fictionalised, though loosely inspired by real events.
These central episodes, particularly the fourth act with its harrowing depiction of a massacre against unarmed civilians, infuse the film with immense emotional power and moral authority. The Odessa Steps sequence, though largely fictional, integrates historically grounded themes from the original screenplay, especially those highlighting anti-Semitism and the brutal oppression exercised by Tsarist authorities.
The film opens with the battleship cruising the Black Sea, where the crew rises in revolt against its officers. It then depicts Tsarist troops marching down the vast Odessa Steps, firing indiscriminately at fleeing civilians and killing countless people. News of the uprising reaches the imperial fleet, which advances toward Odessa to crush the rebellion. In a climactic moment, the sailors steer the Potemkin out to confront the fleet, hoisting the red flag and signalling, “Join us.” No shots are fired.
The massacre on the Odessa Steps remains the most defining sequence of Eisenstein’s masterpiece. The dramatic shifts within the scene—from a joyous crowd to sudden chaos, from panicked workers tumbling down the steps to the accelerating baby carriage, from the shattering of a woman’s spectacles to her lifeless collapse—epitomise a revolutionary experimentation in cinematic form.
Eisenstein was a leading exponent of Soviet montage theory, which relies on the juxtaposition of images to intensify tension and meaning. Through rapid cuts, varied camera angles, and contrasting viewpoints, he creates suspense and emotional shock. Terrified faces of civilians are set against the faceless, mechanical advance of uniformed troops. A military boot crushes a child’s hand; a woman is shot, a bullet piercing her glasses—images designed to convey the utter helplessness of the people.
The film’s influence extended far beyond cinema. Edmund Meisel’s original musical score inspired musicians ranging from the Pet Shop Boys to Michael Nyman, while Dmitri Shostakovich’s later synchronisations powerfully echoed the violence on screen. Aleksandr Rodchenko’s posters for Battleship Potemkin, created in 1925, stand as iconic works of Soviet Constructivist art.
Battleship Potemkin can also be seen as an exploration of collective memory, igniting emotional responses through which past and present are synthesised. A century later, Eisenstein’s negotiation with history remains inseparable from our own processes of remembrance and interpretation.
Even today, the film’s core message—resistance to power and oppression, and solidarity with the marginalised—retains deep relevance, especially amid widening global inequalities. At the same time, Eisenstein’s revolutionary idealism and vision of a better society may seem diminished against the backdrop of later betrayals of those ideals, from the Stalinist purges of the 1930s to the devastation unfolding in contemporary Ukraine. What modern viewers perhaps need is a reinvention of the film’s original message, reaffirming resistance to domination and the dignity of the oppressed.
Eisenstein’s pioneering concept of “dialectical montage,” which juxtaposes conflicting images to produce new emotional and intellectual meaning, closely parallels Marxist ideas of historical change through contradiction and struggle. The film functions as an act of collective memory, linking the 1905 uprising—viewed by Lenin as a precursor to the 1917 Revolution—with the ongoing human quest for a just and humane society.
Ironically, Eisenstein’s international acclaim did little to shield him from repression at home. As the 1920s gave way to the 1930s, Stalinist cultural policy turned sharply against him. His dynamic, dialectical approach clashed with the rigid doctrine of Socialist Realism, which demanded linear narratives, heroic individuals, and unambiguous political messages. Several of his projects were halted, others taken out of his control.
A century on, Battleship Potemkin endures not merely as a historical artefact, but as a living testament to cinema’s power to challenge authority, shape consciousness, and give voice to collective struggle.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

'Tax the top': Nationwide protests demand action as 1% control 40% of India’s wealth

By A Representative   Civil rights groups across the country observed the martyrdom day of Bhagat Singh on March 23, as people from diverse backgrounds united to raise their voices against growing economic inequality. The mobilisations marked the launch of a nationwide campaign against inequality, running from March 23 to April 14 (Ambedkar Jayanti), under the banner of the “Tax The Top” campaign.

Fair prices, fresh produce: Vegetable market opens in Rajasthan tribal village

By Vikas Meshram*  On 18 March 2026, the tribal village of Sajjangarh in southern Rajasthan witnessed the grand and dignified inauguration of a new vegetable market (mandi). Established through the tireless joint efforts of the Krushi Avam Adivasi Swaraj Sangathan (Bhilkuaan) and Vaagdhara, under the active leadership of the Gram Panchayat of Sajjangarh, the market is being hailed as a cornerstone for local self-governance, self-reliance, and a sustainable rural economy. 

Gujarat cadre to HDFC: When bureaucratic style hits corporate walls

By Rajiv Shah   I was a little amused by the abrupt March 17, 2026 resignation of Atanu Chakraborty —a Gujarat cadre IAS officer of the 1985 batch who retired from the government in 2020—as chairman of HDFC Bank . Much of what may have led to his decision to quit this ostensibly high post—actually a non-executive, part-time role—is by now well known. I followed most of it online with considerable interest, partly because I had interacted with him umpteen times during my stint as The Times of India correspondent in Gandhinagar from 1997 to 2012.

Beyond India-China borders: Economic links expand, political gaps persist

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Despite growing trade between India and China, a persistent trust deficit continues to shape their bilateral relationship. Expanding economic engagement has not fully resolved political differences, many of which stem from historical legacies as well as contemporary geopolitical concerns. Border disputes—often traced to colonial-era arrangements—remain a significant obstacle to deeper cooperation, while differing strategic alignments in global affairs add further complexity.

Ex-IAS Atanu Chakraborty and a tale of two different Gujarat vision documents

By Rajiv Shah  The likely appointment of Atanu Chakraborty as HDFC Bank chairman interested me for several reasons, but above all because I have interacted with him closely during my more than 14 year stint in Gandhinagar for the “Times of India”. One of the few decent Gujarat cadre bureaucrats, Chakraborty, belonging to the 1985 IAS batch, at least till I covered Sachivalaya was surely above controversies. He loved to remain faceless, never desired publicity, was professional to the core, and never indulged in loose talk. When he neared retirement, which happened in April 2020, first there were rumours in Sachivalaya that he would be appointed SEBI chairman, and then there was talk he would be chairman (or was it CEO?) of Gujarat International Finance Tec (GIFT) City (a dream project of Narendra Modi as Gujarat chief minister, which as Prime Minister Modi wants to promote, come what may). But, for some strange reasons, and I don’t know why, none of this happened, despite the fact...

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Witnessing Iran beyond propaganda: Truth, war, and the path beyond western paradigm

By Naile Manjarrés  On June 23, 2025—marked as the 2nd of Tir, 1404, on the Persian calendar—a ceasefire between Iran and Israel was announced. This "night of the decree" shifted the trajectory of global affairs; although the world may appear unchanged on the surface, we have yet to fully grasp its impact.

Operation Epic Fury: Making America great at the world’s expense?

By N.S. Venkataraman*  ​The decades-long enmity between Iran and Israel is well-documented, but historically, their direct confrontations have been brief, constrained by the logistical and economic limitations of sustained warfare. The current conflict in the Middle East, however, marks a radical and dangerous departure from this pattern. 

Environmental expert urges policy overhaul as forest and water resources face critical decline

By A Representative   On the occasion of World Forest Day and World Water Day , observed on March 21 and 22, environmental voices from the Western Ghats have issued a stark warning to the Union government, calling for an urgent paradigm shift in how India manages its interconnected natural resources. In a formal communication addressed to Union Minister for Jal Shakti , Sri C R Patil , and Union Minister for Forest, Environment and Climate Change , Sri Bhupendra Yadav , policy analyst Shankar Sharma has highlighted a growing disconnect between sectoral policies and the holistic reality of resource governance.