Skip to main content

Former civil servants raise alarm over Supreme Court’s recent environmental rulings

By A Representative
 
In a significant intervention regarding India’s environmental future, a group of 79 distinguished former civil servants, organized under the Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG), issued an open letter on December 28, 2025, expressing "deep anguish" over recent Supreme Court orders. The collective, which includes former Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon, former Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa, and former Delhi Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung, warned that the judiciary's recent stance risks dismantling essential ecological safeguards in favor of powerful vested interests.
The CCG’s concerns center on three specific judicial developments that they claim compromise the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. The first major point of contention involves the Supreme Court’s November 18 decision to recall a previous May 2025 order. The original May order had struck down the practice of granting "ex-post facto" environmental clearances—essentially regularizing projects that began construction without mandatory prior approval. By recalling this judgment following petitions from real estate and developer associations, the Court has allowed the regularization of such projects to resume. The CCG noted that while a larger bench will eventually settle the law, the current vacancy in regulation rewards violators at a time when Delhi-NCR and North India are facing record-breaking air pollution and extreme climate events.
A second, more localized but ecologically devastating concern involves the Aravalli Hills. The CCG criticized a November 20 order that accepted a new definition of the mountain range, classifying the Aravallis only as landforms rising 100 meters above local relief. Because much of the 670-million-year-old range falls below this height, the group warns that over 90% of the Aravallis could lose environmental protection. This reclassification opens the door for large-scale mining and construction in a region that serves as a vital carbon sink and a natural barrier against the Thar Desert. The former officials warned that this would lead to "state-driven carnage," accelerating desertification, destroying wildlife corridors for leopards and hyenas, and depleting critical aquifers that recharge millions of liters of groundwater for the water-stressed National Capital Region.
The third area of concern focuses on the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), the Supreme Court’s own monitoring body for forest and wildlife matters. The CCG reiterated their long-standing grievance that the CEC has lost its independence and has become a "panel under the influence" of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC). They alleged that the committee now prioritizes the diversion of forest land for industrial use rather than its conservation, pointing out that a member of the CEC was also involved in drafting the controversial 100-meter definition for the Aravallis.
The open letter concludes with a fervent plea to the Supreme Court to uphold the "polluter pays" and "precautionary" principles. The signatories urged the Justices to prioritize the health of Indian citizens and intergenerational equity over the financial interests of corporations. By highlighting the vulnerability of marginalized populations who cannot afford air purifiers and must work in toxic conditions, the CCG called for an urgent judicial return to the role of the ultimate protector of India’s natural heritage and the right to a clean environment.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.