Skip to main content

Proposals for Babri Masjid, Ram Temple spark fears of polarisation before West Bengal polls

By A Representative
 
A political debate has emerged in West Bengal following recent announcements about plans for new religious structures in Murshidabad district, including a proposed mosque to be named Babri Masjid and a separate announcement by a BJP leader regarding the construction of a Ram temple in another location within Behrampur.
The announcements, made months ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections, have triggered sharp reactions from various sections. Critics say the timing and the symbolic nature of the projects appear designed to influence the political atmosphere and shape electoral sentiment by invoking religious identity.
Concerns have been raised particularly over the proposal to name the mosque “Babri Masjid,” a title historically associated with decades of conflict and legal disputes. Observers warn that the decision could generate polarisation at a time when the state has been striving to maintain communal calm.
Alongside broader reactions, the Socialist Party (India) has expressed strong reservations about what it describes as a politically motivated move intended to disturb peace. In a statement, the party argued that decisions on religious constructions should remain within the domain of respective communities and not be driven by political actors. It also said that simultaneous announcements from different political quarters indicate a coordinated attempt to influence voter behaviour by sharpening religious divides.
While noting that the construction of religious structures is not in itself contentious, the party emphasised that using emotive symbols for electoral advantage diverts attention from key public issues, including unemployment, inflation and social welfare. The statement urged vigilance from the Election Commission and called on the administration to ensure that no action is taken that could disrupt communal harmony during the election period.
The party further appealed to the people of West Bengal to remain mindful of attempts to exploit religious identities for political purposes and to uphold values of unity and constitutional principles.

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.