Skip to main content

Month old widespread NIA raids in Delhi, Haryana, and Punjab spark reactions

By A Representative 
As widely reported in the media, a month back, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) conducted early-morning raids across Delhi, Haryana, and Punjab, targeting several individuals and organizations. The raids, which took place on December 20, were reportedly linked to an ongoing investigation under FIR No. RC-01/2023 registered in Lucknow, concerning alleged attempts to revive the Northern Regional Bureau of the banned CPI (Maoist).
Prominent labor rights activists, students, and individuals from various organizations were among those whose premises were searched. In Punjab, raids were conducted in Gandher Village, targeting members of the Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), the Punjab Students Union, and the Pendu Khet Mazdoor Union. Similar actions took place in Gannaur, Haryana, and Okhla, Delhi, including searches at the office of the Delhi General Mazdoor Front (DGMF).
The NIA stated that the operation was part of its mandate to investigate activities posing a threat to national security. However, several individuals and organizations have expressed concerns about the raids. A joint statement by a coalition of civil society groups, labor unions, and academic circles denounced the raids, describing them as an effort to intimidate activists and suppress dissent.
The statement alleges that the raids disproportionately targeted those advocating for labor rights, student movements, and opposition to certain government policies. Among the signatories were prominent academics, lawyers, and political figures who called for the repeal of the NIA Act and a review of the investigation’s scope.
The NIA has not issued a detailed public statement but has maintained that the raids are part of an ongoing lawful investigation. Meanwhile, the matter has ignited discussions about balancing national security measures and protecting democratic rights.

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”