Skip to main content

Unclear whether Trump has conducted a realistic SWOT analysis for the USA: America First policy

By N.S. Venkataraman* 

It is an indisputable fact that the USA has remained a superpower for several decades and continues to hold that position. This dominance is attributed to its vast landmass, abundant natural resources—including crude oil and natural gas—a robust agricultural base, and remarkable achievements in science and technology.
The USA’s success has also been facilitated by its willingness to welcome talented individuals from across the globe. Even today, people from various countries aspire to migrate to the USA, attracted by the freedom it offers, its proactive work culture, a liberal democratic setup, and societal affluence.
While the USA has its share of shortcomings, its positive attributes are overwhelming. Other nations, such as Russia and China, may have similar resources and advantages, but the USA has uniquely harnessed its strengths for the country's benefit.
This is why US presidential elections are closely followed worldwide, more so than leadership changes in any other country. Even the announcements of cabinet appointments by Trump before his swearing-in as President were widely discussed globally.
Why Was Trump Overwhelmingly Voted to Power?
When Trump was re-elected as President with an overwhelming majority, many around the world were surprised. This was especially puzzling given the controversies surrounding him, including allegations of sexual assault, corruption, and the violent attack on Capitol Hill by his supporters after his defeat by Biden—a situation many believe Trump may have influenced. People began to question whether US citizens disregarded the lack of morals in their President's private and public life.
Some attribute Trump's victory to the negative votes caused by President Biden's perceived lackluster performance. Others believe Trump gained immense support due to his "America First" policy, promises to deport illegal migrants, and assurances to end conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.
Regardless, after taking office, Trump has stayed true to his image of prioritizing his agenda, even if it disrupts others, as long as it aligns with his "America First" philosophy.
How Will the World React to Trump’s America?
Trump has made several contentious statements, such as claiming the Panama Canal should belong to the USA, suggesting Canada could be an extended US territory, and proposing a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico. He also threatened to impose a 100% tariff on BRICS nations if they launched a parallel currency to challenge the dominance of the US dollar. Additionally, he has asserted that illegal migrants would be forcibly deported. These remarks are often seen as extreme and unbalanced.
In this context, it is inevitable that countries worldwide may begin to perceive Trump as assuming that the USA has a divine right to police the world. If Trump continues to enforce his priorities globally—such as withdrawing from WHO and the Paris Climate Agreement—other nations are unlikely to remain passive. Governments may start strategizing on how to counterbalance "Trump’s America." While immediate strong measures are unlikely, this line of thinking will persist.
Countries like Russia, China, and Iran, which already despise the USA’s perceived superiority complex, and certain extremist groups might pose threats to Trump's America.
Is This Due to a Lack of SWOT Analysis?
It is unclear whether Trump has conducted a realistic Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis for the USA. His "America First" policy appears to reflect a belief in US dominance over global affairs, but has he adequately considered the risks and mitigation strategies?
While the "America First" policy is not inherently flawed, the question remains: Should this policy come at the cost of offending other nations? Even discerning Americans may begin to ponder this. Deporting illegal migrants, for instance, is a highly sensitive issue. These individuals entered the USA due to past administrations' lack of scrutiny, and many have since become law-abiding residents. Critics may view such deportations as inhumane, particularly since some American companies rely on the low-cost labor they provide.
The "America First" policy has the potential to strengthen America’s global standing, but it should not result in "cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face"—an act that harms both others and oneself.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.