If RSS and BJP truly believe in Manusmriti, they should implement it and face the consequences

By Kanwal Bharti

Recently, I read in the newspaper about a group of Dalit students in Banaras who organized a program to burn Manusmriti. They are now in jail. This act raises a critical question: why do Dalits engage in such actions? They claim to follow Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, but they seem to ignore the historical context of his criticism of Manusmriti. For Ambedkar, Manusmriti represented Hindu separatism in its time. How do Dalits perceive it today? If they identify as Hindus, why oppose Manusmriti?

It’s worth noting that Manusmriti says little about Dalit castes, historically regarded as "Untouchables." Its rules are primarily directed at Shudras and women, particularly those from upper castes. If anyone should rebel against Manusmriti, it should be the Shudras, now categorized as OBCs, who ironically are some of the strongest supporters of the idea of a Hindu Rashtra.

Perhaps Dalits should demand the implementation of Manusmriti. Let it be enforced so its contradictions become evident. This will never happen because even the RSS knows that the Brahmins themselves won’t accept it. If Manusmriti were implemented under a Hindu Rashtra, the results would be catastrophic for Hindu society.

Two things would undoubtedly occur:

1. Upper-caste men and women would revolt against its oppressive rules.

2. If their rebellion were suppressed, Hindu society would regress into a dark age.

Take, for example, the fate of women under Manusmriti. If enforced, women would lose their rights to education, work, and personal freedom. Upper-caste women, who today are professionals, politicians, and leaders, would face a future limited to child marriage, domestic servitude, and widowhood in isolation. Would modern Indian women, especially those of the upper castes, accept such a fate?

Author

The RSS and BJP glorify Manusmriti to maintain the narrative of Sanatan Dharma, yet they avoid implementing it because its regressive laws would face outright rejection—even by Brahmins. The RSS’s agenda is less about reviving Indian culture and more about promoting Brahmin dominance, masked as Hindu nationalism. This agenda, inspired by figures like Lord Ram, involves dividing and exploiting lower castes while consolidating power under the guise of unity.

The Contradictions of Manusmriti

Manusmriti contains laws that are incompatible with modern society. For example:

- It mandates celibate study of the Vedas for decades before entering household life. Would any Hindu, especially from the upper castes, dedicate 18-36 years to such a practice in today’s world?

- It prescribes child marriage, suggesting 30-year-old men marry 12-year-old girls and 24-year-old men marry 8-year-old girls. Will Hindu families accept a return to this practice, which denies women education and leads to early deaths from childbearing?

- It prohibits widow remarriage, confining widows to a life of isolation or pushing them towards practices like sati. Would modern Hindus, especially women, tolerate this regression?

These laws, if enforced, would take Hindu society back to an era of ignorance and oppression. The progress achieved by rejecting such practices would be undone.

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat criticizes the Indian Constitution as being based on “foreign ideas,” advocating instead for a Hindu Rashtra rooted in “Indian culture.” But this vision of Indian culture is, in reality, Brahmin culture—a framework of dominance and exclusion. The dream of reviving Manusmriti is impractical because no Hindu, least of all the Brahmins, would accept its draconian rules today.

If the RSS and BJP truly believe in Manusmriti, they should implement it and face the consequences. The resulting backlash from Hindus themselves, particularly the upper castes, would expose the hypocrisy of their agenda and the inherent contradictions of using Manusmriti as the foundation for a modern society.

---

English translation from Hindi by S R Darapuri, I.P.S.(Retd), National President, All India Peoples Front

Comments

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

By Rajiv Shah This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan* “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan* A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey* In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Beyond sattvik: Purity, caste and the politics of the Indian kitchen

By Rajiv Shah A few week ago, I was forwarded an article that appeared in the British weekly The Economist . Titled “Caste and cuisine: From honeycomb curry to blood fry: India’s ‘untouchable’ cooking”, it took me back to what I had blogged about what was called a “ sattvik food festival”, an annual event organised by former Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad professor Anil Gupta.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Search This Blog