Skip to main content

This Indian British Marxist blamed USSR's collapse in 1991 on Khrushchev's 'revisionism'

By Harsh Thakor* 
Harpal Singh Brar, British Indian Marxist scholar and communist leader, has passed away in Chandigarh. He was 85. He was a lifelong supporter of socialism, Marxism, and the working class. He will be remembered among British Communists.
Harpal was born on 5 October 1939 in Fattanwala village, district Muktsar, Punjab. His father was a farmer, Harchand Singh Brar, who later became a businessman and an MLA in the Punjab assembly. After studying at Khalsa High School and Khalsa College in Muktsar, he studied law in Delhi and then at University College London.
He was introduced to Marxism in a Luton library and later married an English student, Maysel Sharp.
While teaching law in London, Harpal focused on promoting Socialism. He was a leader in the Indian Workers’ Association (IWA-GB) and founded its anti-imperialist journal, Lalkar.
He wrote on socialist history, theory, and practice, and founded the Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist) in 2004. He was Chairman of the Stalin Society of Great Britain and Honorary Chairman of the World Anti-Imperialist Platform.
He is survived by three children, Joti, Ranjeet, and Carlos, seven grandchildren, and his partner, Ella Rule.
Harpal supported Marxist-Leninist ideology and opposed reactionary movements. He was a scholar and activist known for his commitment to his beliefs.
His journey from Fattanwala to becoming a global advocate for the working class and anti-imperialism was notable. Marxists should ensure his legacy continues to inspire future generations.
Ideological Thrust and Orientation of Brar
Harpal followed Marx and Lenin, viewing the Russian Revolution as a significant event for humanity. He criticized Trotskyism, defended Stalin, and opposed Khrushchevism and revisionism, which he believed led to the fall of Soviet Socialism.
He defended the USSR's role in World War II and opposed globalization, supporting North Korea, Cuba, China, and Russia against U.S. hegemony.
Harpal supported liberation struggles in Zimbabwe, South Africa, Vietnam, Korea, Palestine, and Ireland. He focused on freeing the working class from capitalist exploitation and imperialism.
He wrote on proletarian revolution and women's liberation and criticized the Labour Party as an imperialist party. He sought to integrate revolutionary politics with British workers.
After the USSR's collapse in 1991, Harpal blamed Khrushchev's revisionism. He opposed Zionism and supported Palestinian self-determination.
Harpal defended Communists like Stalin and Mao, supported Iraq against the U.S., and backed Iran's right to possess weapons. He argued that capitalist imperialism leads to crises, wars, and oppression of the working class.
He noted that since 2008, imperialist governments transferred wealth from taxpayers to financiers, attacking workers at home and waging wars abroad.
Harpal emphasized the need for British socialists to combat racism and for black socialists to oppose separatism and black bourgeois nationalism. He urged workers to unite against national oppression and privileges.
Harpal wrote on Marxism, imperialism, and related topics. His works included critiques of Trotskyism, Leninism, and revisionism, and analyses of British class structure, Soviet victory over fascism, and Claudia Jones.
Under Harpal, Lalkar countered imperialism, neo-fascism, racism, and revisionism. It exposed British capitalism and opposed Modi's rule in India. While critical of Maoism, it acknowledged leaders like Chairman Gonzalo and Professor Joma Sison.
Harpal viewed post-1978 China as practicing "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics." However, he was criticized for not opposing revisionist parties like CPI or CPI-M, or events like Operation Greenhunt in India.
Despite shortcomings, Harpal's contributions to fighting capitalist oppression should be recognized. Marxists must preserve his legacy.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Arrests of Odisha activists raise wider concerns over criminalisation of dissent: CASR

By A Representative   A coalition of civil liberties, human rights, student, labour organisations,  Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), has condemned the arrest of Dr. Randall Sequeira, a doctor providing healthcare in Odisha’s Kalahandi and Rayagada districts, and Laxman Nayak, an activist associated with the Maa Mati Mali Surakhya Manch, and demanded their immediate release.

Bangkok IMF-World Bank meetings: New reports put India's debt, climate, accountability crisis in focus

Counterview News   As the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded their Annual Meetings in Bangkok this week, civil society groups and policy experts outside the official proceedings released two critical documents challenging the institutions' legacy and prescriptions for Asia, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the global financial architecture.