Trump's stringent policies are likely to strain America's international relations further

By Vikas Meshram*

In November 2024, Donald Trump won the U.S. presidential election with a massive majority, marking the beginning of his second term as the 47th President of the United States. His return to power has been marked by several controversial decisions that are poised to significantly impact America's domestic and international policies, as well as global politics. His strategic approach highlights a strong inclination toward nationalism and protectionism.

One of Trump's first and most controversial decisions in this term was granting pardons to nearly 1,600 individuals involved in the January 2021 Capitol riots. While this move pleased his supporters, it faced widespread opposition across various quarters. Trump described these individuals as "patriots" who fought for the rights of the "real America." However, this decision has raised significant concerns about the autonomy of the judiciary.

Trump also decided to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO), accusing it of failing to manage the COVID-19 pandemic effectively and showing bias toward China. Despite the U.S. being a major financial contributor to the WHO, this bold decision has far-reaching implications for global health initiatives, including programs targeting diseases like HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. The U.S. funds 18% of the WHO’s budget, and its withdrawal is expected to exacerbate challenges faced by global health programs.

Signing an order to withdraw from the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, Trump targeted multilateralism, creating a new precedent. Since George W. Bush's withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol in 2001, the U.S. has become the only country to exit climate agreements three times. Trump's second withdrawal, especially at a time when the world has recorded its first calendar year with temperatures exceeding 1.5°C, has drawn global disappointment.

The U.S., as the world's second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases and its most powerful economy, holds a significant responsibility for global climate leadership. However, with a history of reneging on such commitments, particularly under Trump, the world is questioning America's reliability in addressing climate change. By 2022, the U.S. had achieved only one-third of its 2030 emission reduction target. Trump's emphasis on fossil fuel production further threatens the global environment.

Trump has also taken a hardline stance on immigration, proposing to revoke the birthright citizenship of undocumented immigrants' children. This decision could have serious repercussions for immigrant families. Additionally, he has signaled stricter restrictions on immigration to the U.S.

Another controversial proposal is the imposition of a 100% import tariff on BRICS countries, including India. This decision could severely impact the economies of these nations, especially India, which plays a pivotal role in trade between the U.S. and BRICS countries. Indian exporters and importers could face significant setbacks.

Trump's second term has also been marked by unconventional and contentious proposals, such as claiming rights over the Panama Canal, incorporating Greenland into the U.S., and revoking rights for the transgender community. These proposals have sparked widespread debates and criticism.

One of his more polarizing proposals is the repeal of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees citizenship to all individuals born in the United States. While this decision could significantly impact immigrant families, it is expected to face extensive legal challenges.

Trump's stringent policies are likely to strain America's international relations further. Withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, exiting the WHO, and imposing tariffs on BRICS countries could tarnish the U.S.'s image in the global community. His prioritization of industrial growth over environmental concerns has long-term implications for global environmental crises.

Despite widespread criticism domestically and internationally, Trump enjoys immense popularity among his supporters. His second term has begun with a bold and unconventional agenda, making it a pivotal period in global politics. Moving forward, it will be essential to reassess America's policies and responsibilities to prioritize global cooperation and accountability. The long-term implications of Trump's decisions will become evident over time, but for now, his second term marks a significant chapter in international relations.

---

*Journalist

Comments

US-China truce temporary, larger trade war between two economies to continue

By Prabir Purkayastha The Trump-Xi meeting in Busan, South Korea on 30 October 2025 may have brought about a temporary relief in the US-China trade war. But unless we see the fine print of the agreement, it is difficult to assess whether this is a temporary truce or the beginning of a real rapprochement between the two nations. The jury is still out on that one and we will wait for a better understanding of what has really been achieved in Busan.

When growth shrinks people: Capitalism and the biological decline of the U.S. population

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* Critically acclaimed Hungarian-American economic historian and distinguished scholar of economic anthropometric history, Prof. John Komlos (Professor Emeritus, University of Munich), who pioneered the study of the history of human height and weight, has published an article titled “The Decline in the Physical Stature of the U.S. Population Parallels the Diminution in the Rate of Increase in Life Expectancy” on October 31, 2025, in the forthcoming issue of Social Science & Medicine (SSM) – Population Health, Volume 32, December 2025. The findings of the article present a damning critique of the barbaric nature of capitalism and its detrimental impact on human health, highlighting that the average height of Americans began to decline during the era of free-market capitalism. The study draws on an analysis of 17 surveys from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (...

Justice for Zubeen Garg: Fans persist as investigations continue in India and Singapore

By Nava Thakuria* Even a month after the death of Assam’s cultural icon Zubeen Garg in Singapore under mysterious circumstances, thousands of his fans and admirers across eastern India continue their campaign for “ JusticeForZubeenGarg .” A large digital campaign has gained momentum, with over two million social media users from around the world demanding legal action against those allegedly responsible. Although the Assam government has set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT), which has arrested seven people, and a judicial commission headed by Justice Soumitra Saikia of the Gauhati High Court to oversee the probe, public pressure for justice remains strong.

Is vaccine the Voldemort of modern medicine to be left undiscussed, unscrutinised?

By Deepika* Sridhar Vembu of Zoho stirred up an internet storm by tweeting about the possible link of autism to the growing number of vaccines given to children in India . He had only asked the parents to analyse the connection but doctors, so called public health experts vehemently started opposing Vembu's claims, labeling them "dangerous misinformation" that could erode “vaccine trust”!

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Trump escalates threats of war against Venezuela, as millions in US set to lose essential benefits

By Manolo De Los Santos The United States government is in the grips of one of its longest-running funding gaps in history. The ongoing government shutdown has already stretched beyond 30 days and now, the food security of millions of Americans is at risk as the funding to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is drying up and Trump officials have refused to tap into contingency funds . Approximately 42 million individuals per month rely on SNAP benefits and are set to lose them beginning on November 1.

Gujarat civil society to move Supreme Court against controversial electoral roll revision

By Rajiv Shah A recent, well-attended meeting of Gujarat civil society activists in Ahmedabad , held to discuss the impact of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, has decided to file a petition in the Supreme Court against the controversial exercise initiated by the Election Commission of India (ECI) across the country. Announcing this, senior High Court advocate Anand Yagnik , who heads the Gujarat chapter of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), said that a committee has already been formed to examine the pros and cons of SIR. “While the SIR exercise began in Gujarat on November 4 and is scheduled to continue for a month, we will file a supporting petition in the case against SIR in the Gujarat High Court or the Supreme Court after observing how it proceeds in the state,” he said. Yagnik’s announcement followed senior advocate Shahrukh Alam —who is arguing the SIR case in the Supreme Court—urging Gujarat’s civil society to also file ...

Why PESA, a Birsa Munda legacy, remains India’s unfulfilled commitment to its tribal peoples

By Raj Kumar Sinha* Nearly three decades ago, the Indian Parliament enacted a landmark law for tribal regions — the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, better known as PESA. This legislation sought to restore the traditional autonomy of tribal societies and empower them to use local resources according to their customs and needs. However, such decentralization never sat well with today’s developmental politicians, capitalists, and bureaucrats. The question therefore arises — what makes PESA so important?

Search This Blog