Skip to main content

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

 
By A Representative
 
A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.
According to the letter, publicly available accounts indicate that the immediate wrongdoing in the episode was vandalism and assault allegedly carried out by members of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), described as an external political organisation. The violence reportedly included damage to property and harm to students and staff, and is characterised in the letter as a direct attack on the autonomy and safety of the university community.
The signatories argue that matters relating to procedure, event approvals and internal disagreements are ordinarily addressed through established disciplinary and governance mechanisms within universities. Converting such issues into criminal allegations, they contend, risks conflating debate or administrative lapses with illegality and introduces the threat of state coercion into academic life.
Describing criminal law as an instrument of last resort, the letter states that it should not be used to regulate student expression, manage reputational concerns or respond to disruption by external political actors. The continued pendency of a criminal case against students, the signatories note, leaves them under the shadow of potential prosecution and may undermine conditions necessary for free inquiry, intellectual risk-taking and collective trust on campus.
The letter calls on the university administration to take immediate and transparent steps to ensure that no student faces criminal consequences for academic discussion or debate conducted within constitutional bounds. Specifically, it urges the leadership to publicly affirm that student expression within constitutional limits will not be criminalised; to use all available legal and institutional avenues to secure closure of the FIR against the Spark Reading Circle at the earliest opportunity; and to recommit to internal, non-carceral mechanisms for addressing procedural or administrative concerns.
Framing the episode as a test of institutional values, the signatories urge the university to act swiftly to restore confidence within its community and uphold the principles it has long espoused.
The letter is endorsed by more than 400 signatories from a wide range of institutions and professions, including current and former faculty members of universities in India and abroad, researchers, students, journalists, artists and independent scholars. Among those who have signed are academics affiliated with institutions such as Jawaharlal Nehru University, the University of Delhi, IIT Bombay, Ashoka University, the National Law School of India University, and several international universities. The full list of signatories has been attached to the letter.

Comments

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”