Skip to main content

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

 
By A Representative
 
A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.
According to the letter, publicly available accounts indicate that the immediate wrongdoing in the episode was vandalism and assault allegedly carried out by members of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), described as an external political organisation. The violence reportedly included damage to property and harm to students and staff, and is characterised in the letter as a direct attack on the autonomy and safety of the university community.
The signatories argue that matters relating to procedure, event approvals and internal disagreements are ordinarily addressed through established disciplinary and governance mechanisms within universities. Converting such issues into criminal allegations, they contend, risks conflating debate or administrative lapses with illegality and introduces the threat of state coercion into academic life.
Describing criminal law as an instrument of last resort, the letter states that it should not be used to regulate student expression, manage reputational concerns or respond to disruption by external political actors. The continued pendency of a criminal case against students, the signatories note, leaves them under the shadow of potential prosecution and may undermine conditions necessary for free inquiry, intellectual risk-taking and collective trust on campus.
The letter calls on the university administration to take immediate and transparent steps to ensure that no student faces criminal consequences for academic discussion or debate conducted within constitutional bounds. Specifically, it urges the leadership to publicly affirm that student expression within constitutional limits will not be criminalised; to use all available legal and institutional avenues to secure closure of the FIR against the Spark Reading Circle at the earliest opportunity; and to recommit to internal, non-carceral mechanisms for addressing procedural or administrative concerns.
Framing the episode as a test of institutional values, the signatories urge the university to act swiftly to restore confidence within its community and uphold the principles it has long espoused.
The letter is endorsed by more than 400 signatories from a wide range of institutions and professions, including current and former faculty members of universities in India and abroad, researchers, students, journalists, artists and independent scholars. Among those who have signed are academics affiliated with institutions such as Jawaharlal Nehru University, the University of Delhi, IIT Bombay, Ashoka University, the National Law School of India University, and several international universities. The full list of signatories has been attached to the letter.

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.