There is no dearth of proofs in the documents of the RSS which conclusively establish the fact that RSS denounced movements led by revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekar Azad and their associates. Not only that, but they also hated even the reformist and moderate movements conducted by leaders like Gandhiji against the British rulers.
Here is a passage from the chapter 'Martyr, great but not ideal' of "Bunch of Thoughts," the collection of writings of MS Golwalkar decrying the whole tradition of martyrs. After declaring that his objects of worship have always been successful lives and that 'Bhartiya culture' [which surely means RSS culture] does not adore and idealize martyrdom and does not treat "such martyrs as their heroes", he went on to philosophise that:
"There is no doubt that such men who embrace martyrdom are great heroes and their philosophy too is pre-eminently manly. They are far above the average men who meekly submit to fate and remain in fear and inaction. All the same, such persons are not held up as ideals in our society. We have not looked upon their martyrdom as the highest point of greatness to which men should aspire. For, after all, they failed in achieving their ideal, and failure implies some fatal flaw in them." ("Bunch of Thoughts," p. 283.)
Could there be a statement more insulting and denigrating to the martyrs than this?
It will be shocking for any Indian who loves the martyrs of the Freedom Movement to know what Hedgewar, founder of RSS, felt about the revolutionaries fighting against the British. According to his biography published by RSS:
"Patriotism is not only going to prison. It is not correct to be carried away by such superficial patriotism. He used to urge that while remaining prepared to die for the country when the time came, it is very necessary to have a desire to live while organising for the freedom of the country." (CP Bhishikar, "Sanghavariksh Ke Beej: Dr. Keshavrao Hedgewar," p. 21.)
It is indeed a pity that Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Ashfaqullah Khan and Chandrashekhar Azad did not come into contact with this contemporary great patriotic thinker. If they had the great opportunity to meet him, these martyrs could have been saved from giving their lives for 'superficial patriotism'.
Even the word 'shameful' is not appropriate to describe the attitude of the RSS leadership towards those who had sacrificed everything in the struggle against the British rulers. The last Mughal ruler of India, Bahadur Shah Zafar had emerged as the rallying point for patriotic Indians and a symbol of the Great War of Independence of 1857. Golwalkar wrote thus while making fun of him:
"In 1857, the so-called last emperor of India had given the clarion call — Gazio mein bu rahegi jub talak eeman ki / takhte London tak chalegi tegh Hindustan ki (Till the warriors remain faithful to their commitment / Indian swords will reach the throne of London.) But ultimately what happened? Everybody knows that." (Golwalkar, M.S., "Shri Guruji Samagra Darshan," collected works of Golwalkar in Hindi, Bhartiya Vichar Sadhna, Nagpur, n.d., vol. 1, p. 121.)
What Golwalkar thought of the people sacrificing their lot for the country is obvious from the following words of his also. He had the temerity to ask the great revolutionaries who wished to lay down their lives for the freedom of the motherland the following question, as if he were representing the British:
"But one should think whether complete national interest is accomplished by that? Sacrifice does not lead to an increase in the thinking of the society of giving all for the interest of the nation. It is borne by the experience up to now that this fire in the heart is unbearable to the common people." (Ibid., pp. 61–62.)
This also must be the reason that RSS produced no fighters or martyrs during the Freedom Movement.
It is the duty of every patriotic Indian who respects these great martyrs to share these anti-national and degenerate ideas of the RSS against the anti-colonial freedom struggle with family and friends, so that the Hindutva gang is forcefully exposed.
---
Comments
Post a Comment
NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor