Thirteen BHU students fabricated on false charges win bail rights

By Harsh Thakor*

Thirteen students arrested on charges of attempting to burn the Manusmriti at Banaras Hindu University (BHU) were granted bail on January 11, 2025. The following day, on January 12, the students held a press conference under the banner of the Bhagat Singh Students Morcha (BSM) at Paradkar Bhawan in Maidagin.

The arrested individuals—Mukesh Kumar, Sandeep Jaiswal, Amar Sharma, Arvind Pal, Anupam Kumar, Lakshman Kumar, Avinash, Arvind, Shubham Kumar, Adarsh, Ipsita Agarwal, Siddhi Tiwari, and Katyayani B. Reddy—were accused of planning to burn the Manusmriti as part of a protest.

During the press conference, Advocate Prem Prakash Singh Yadav criticized the arrests, describing them as unconstitutional. According to Amar Ujala, Advocate Yadav alleged that the charges violated Supreme Court guidelines and fundamental human rights. He further highlighted discrepancies in the police records, noting that while three female students were detained on the evening of December 25, the First Information Report (FIR) misleadingly listed their arrest date as December 26. Yadav assured that legal action would be taken against the officers involved.

Akanksha Azad, president of the Bhagat Singh Students Morcha, condemned the BHU administration, asserting that the arrests were part of a vendetta against their long-standing struggle for democratic rights. She referred to a 2023 incident in which the university administration allegedly shielded the accused in a gang rape case involving an IIT-BHU student until the Morcha’s pressure led to their arrests. Azad argued that the recent arrests in the Manusmriti case were another example of institutional retaliation against dissent.

Civil society representative S.P. Rai also criticized BHU, highlighting the contradiction in supporting research on the Manusmriti while penalizing discussions around it. Rai expressed solidarity with the students and reaffirmed civil society’s support for their rights.

The Bhagat Singh Students Morcha announced plans for another press conference to expose the fabricated charges. Advocate Prem Prakash Yadav reiterated that the allegations were baseless and aimed at criminalizing the students.

The arrests stemmed from an event at BHU on December 25, 2024, organized by the BSM to observe Manusmriti Dahan Divas, commemorating Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s symbolic burning of the Manusmriti in 1927 to protest caste discrimination. The discussion, held at the Arts Faculty, was disrupted by university officials and security personnel, leading to clashes.

An FIR (No. 523/2024) filed on December 26 accused 13 BSM members of violent and disruptive behavior, including pushing and assaulting security staff. Nine current students and four alumni were charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, including assault on public servants, inciting religious hostility, rioting, and attempted culpable homicide.

The FIR alleged that the students gathered near the Arts Faculty at 5:30 PM with the intent to burn the Manusmriti. Security personnel claimed the students misbehaved, assaulted guards, and injured two female staff members, Shipra Mishra and Shikha Mishra, who were hospitalized.

The arrested students were taken to Lanka Police Station, held overnight without access to legal counsel, and reportedly subjected to physical assault. They were sent to 14-day judicial custody at the District Jail, Chaukaghat.

Students alleged they were physically assaulted, their clothes torn, and personal belongings damaged during detention. As they were taken to jail, the students protested, chanting slogans like “Manusmriti Murdabad,” “Inquilab Zindabad,” “Jai Bhim,” and “Stop violence against students.”

The charges against the 13 individuals carry a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.

---

*Freelance journalist

Comments

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman* In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Search This Blog