Skip to main content

North Gujarat gram panchayat bars villagers from dealing with Muslim hawkers, traders

By A Representative 

A gram panchayat in North Gujarat has barred its residents not to buy anything from Muslim traders and hawkers. An order of the Waghasan group gram panchayat of Tharad taluka of Banaskantha district dated June 30 states that the decision has been taken in the wake of beheading of a Hindu tailor after he posted a derogatory writeup on Prophet Mohammad in Udaipur.
The gram panchayat resolution says, anyone seen buying or selling any commodity from a Muslim hawker or trader would be fined Rs 5,100. Bringing this to light, Mujahid Nafees, convener, Minority Coordination Committee, in a letter to Gujarat chief minister Bhupendra Patel, says, the state government should take legal action against the panchayat chief who has signed the “unjust” order.
The letter says, the act of the sarpanch and other signatories is a violation of rule of law of the state and threat to peace, pointing out, the move is in violation of Article 15 of the Constitution, which says that none should be discriminated on the basis of religion, caste, sex, sex, or place of birth, and Article 19, which guarantees free movement of citizens and hold any occupation, trade or business throughout the territory of India
The letter further says, the sarpanch has no authority to boycott any person from doing business. The panchayat has no administrative powers to do under the Gujarat Panchayat Act 1993, Sections 130 to 132, it notes, adding, the sarpanch has misused the position to harm the peace of the district and the rule of law, which is also a criminal act under various sections of the IPC.
“We demand that with immediate effect an FIR is filed under appropriate sections of the IPC on the sarpanch and other signatories and they should arrested”, the letter pleads, adding, the sarpanch should be immediately “suspended for misuse of power under the Gujarat Panchayat Act 1993.”

Comments

  1. AnonymousJuly 03, 2022

    This committee issue the fake letter when the body not work and administrative work why the use this type of letter means again make the froud under IPC 420 arrest and fir register... Second they send the other letter regarding the sry for this letter again' use the froud letter pad..

    This is the serious case because of under administrative officer work may be some.major.work on this.. all singing authority make the froud case.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.