Skip to main content

PLFS data: Is rising employment good news? Deeper analysis suggests contrary results

By Ishwar Chandra Awasthi, Puneet Kumar Shrivastav* 

Results of the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), 2020-21, released by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India (GoI) on June 14, 2022, show improvement in work force participation rate (WPR) and labour force participation rate (LFPR) and declining unemployment rate. Four rounds of data have been released from 2017-18 to 2020-21 based on PLFS.
The general trend in the last four rounds clearly shows consistent increase in WPR and LFPR and falling unemployment rates by usual status (PS+SS). Though increase in WPR and LFPR is reported highest in 2019-20 over 2018-19, yet rising trend in these two key indicators continues throughout, and similarly fall in unemployment is registered highest in 2019-20 over 2018-19.
Clearly, the recent results give some solace and relief after unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic that has entailed enormous loss of human lives and livelihoods and crippled economic activities (Figure-1). However, some deeper analysis provides contrary results and clearly shows that all is not good as portrayed by these results. Some cursory analysis helps to demolish the encouraging news.
The sectoral movements of workforce indicate that primary sector employment, mainly the agriculture, shows rise of workforce during the period barring a bit slow down in 2018-19. The retrogression of workforce to agriculture somehow is not positive sign of wellbeing of workforce.
Understandably, those working in non-agriculture sector have returned to agriculture under duress conditions where real wages are lower compared to non-agriculture sector. This is certainly an employment of last resort. Employment in secondary sector stagnated and tertiary sector employment contracted in 2019-20 and 2020-21 (Figure-2). These sectors are considered better paid compared to agriculture sector.
Employment is generally disaggregated into self-employment, regular employment and casual employment. Regular paid employment is generally considered secure and better which is also a proxy of decent employment. Self-employment is considered fairly secure, though incomes from certain activities might be highly irregular, inadequate and even uncertain. However, for typical casual workers, neither duration of employment nor income is certain.
In agriculture sector, self-employment shows a modest uptrend, the regular salaried/wage employment has almost stagnated and casual employment has also declined during the period (2017-17 to 2020-21). Thus, most of the employment has occurred in self-employment in agriculture.
In the secondary sector, self-employment has generally stagnated barring in 2020-21 that saw some improvements. Regular salaried/ wage employment also stagnated and declined albeit sharply in 2020-21 compared to earlier years. Casual employment also declined or stagnated with some marginal spurt in 2020-21. In services sector, self-employment stagnated from 2017-18 to 2019-20 and later some increases were noticed in 2020-21. The regular salaried/ wage employment also stagnated and declined in 2020-21. The casual employment shows a steady decline over the years.
The rise in employment has been observed in those segments which are informal and unorganized receiving no social security and without the preview of labour laws. Undeniably, nature of employment occurred as a form of last resort or distress form of employment where people cannot afford to remain unemployed for any length of time and often forced to resort whatever employment is available (Table -1).
The newly sought information in PLFS 2020-21 reveals that 12.6 percent of the self-employed engaged in primary sector are the user or consumer of their own produced products via economic activities in which they are engaged in. Whatever they are producing is being consumed by them only.
So, the question here arises whether such economic activities should be considered as employment in real sense or it’s just a strategy for survival of livelihood. Further, one third (32%) of the self-employed individuals under primary sector do sell less than 50 percent share of their produce and rest is being used for their own consumption. Only 12.5 percent self-employed do use their entire produce for market (Figure-3).
Indeed, a country like India, where more than half of the workforce is engaged in self-employment activities, which is being promoted with sincere policy efforts by government, is still long way to go. Given evidences compel us to wonder whether all that glittering is really a gold.
---
*Dr Awasthi is Professor at Institute for Human Development, New Delhi; Dr Shrivastav is Assistant Director, National Institute of Labour Economics Research & Development (Under NITI Aayog, GoI), New Delhi. Views are personal

Comments

TRENDING

Advocacy group decries 'hyper-centralization' as States’ share of health funds plummets

By A Representative   In a major pre-budget mobilization, the Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), India’s leading public health advocacy network, has issued a sharp critique of the Union government’s health spending and demanded a doubling of the health budget for the upcoming 2026-27 fiscal year. 

Delhi Jal Board under fire as CAG finds 55% groundwater unfit for consumption

By A Representative   A Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India audit report tabled in the Delhi Legislative Assembly on 7 January 2026 has revealed alarming lapses in the quality and safety of drinking water supplied by the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), raising serious public health concerns for residents of the capital. 

Zhou Enlai: The enigmatic premier who stabilized chaos—at what cost?

By Harsh Thakor*  Zhou Enlai (1898–1976) served as the first Premier of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from 1949 until his death and as Foreign Minister from 1949 to 1958. He played a central role in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for over five decades, contributing to its organization, military efforts, diplomacy, and governance. His tenure spanned key events including the Long March, World War II alliances, the founding of the PRC, the Korean War, and the Cultural Revolution. 

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

'Threat to farmers’ rights': New seeds Bill sparks fears of rising corporate control

By Bharat Dogra  As debate intensifies over a new seeds bill, groups working on farmers’ seed rights, seed sovereignty and rural self-reliance have raised serious concerns about the proposed legislation. To understand these anxieties, it is important to recognise a global trend: growing control of the seed sector by a handful of multinational companies. This trend risks extending corporate dominance across food and farming systems, jeopardising the livelihoods and rights of small farmers and raising serious ecological and health concerns. The pending bill must be assessed within this broader context.

Climate advocates face scrutiny as India expands coal dependence

By A Representative   The National Alliance for Climate and Environmental Justice (NACEJ) has strongly criticized what it described as coercive actions against climate activists Harjeet Singh and Sanjay Vashisht, following enforcement raids reportedly carried out on the basis of alleged violations of foreign exchange regulations and intelligence inputs. 

A balancing act? Global power rivalry over Iran challenges India’s foreign policy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A stable Iran is clearly in India’s interest. While US President Donald Trump has so far avoided a direct attack, the situation remains deeply uncertain. The central problem is that few governments take Trump’s words at face value. His actions have revealed a clear pattern: Washington targets adversaries even while pretending to negotiate with them.