Skip to main content

Why big fuss about special issue on Savarkar? None cared for 'real' Gandhi till now

By Prem Singh* 

Some Gandhians appear to be indignant about the special issue of 'Antim Jan' on Sarvakar. It is a monthly magazine published by a government organization, Gandhi Darshan and Smriti. Some journalists, intellectuals and party spokespersons/ leaders too have expressed their unhappiness over the special issue. Gandhi's great-grandson Tushar Gandhi's statement has also reacted to it.
'Gandhi Darshan and Smriti' is an organization related to the life and thoughts of Gandhi. Opponents believe that this institution's special issue on Savarkar is part of the 'Hindutva' agenda of the present government. They say that by doing so the government has tried to distort Gandhi's philosophy and reduce his stature.
Gandhi received recognition due to his life, his role in Indian politics, and his philosophy based on his beliefs. This was evident on the amphitheatre of India and the world. Even after he was gone, Gandhi's stature has remained unchallenged in the world. The reason behind this is his life and philosophy.
Indeed, Gandhi's leadership in the decisive phase of the Indian independence movement, has emerged as an illustration and an ideal in the history of human civilization. His role and philosophy are reflected on the thought patterns of the entire human civilization.
This is why Einstein said that generations to come would hardly believe that such a man made of flesh and blood ever existed on earth. It would be important to note that the great scientist Einstein, who considered Gandhi the most significant leader among all the world leaders, never had a personal meeting with Gandhi.
The history of human civilization should not be a chain of times based on human tendencies such as falsehood, violence, hatred, deceit, cowardice, conspiracy, malice, animosity, greed, and so on. Humanity therefore needs Gandhi – in order to maintain truth, non-violence and love at the root of life.
If, due to merely the misplaced efforts of some people with limited understanding, Gandhi's philosophy could possibly be distorted and his stature reduced, then his life and impact could not have left an undeniable mark on the history of human civilization.
Those who are concerned about the distortion of Gandhi's philosophy and attempts to belittle his stature, should make themselves good Gandhians before questioning the activities of their opponents. Only then the existence of Gandhi will find true permanence.
Gandhi did not consider opponents as his enemies even if they came to support the British and oppose the freedom movement. He had human feelings even for the British, who subjugated India because he had a new perspective to fight his opponents.
Attempts have been made in India in the past to make Gandhi stand out in comparison to other personalities. Some weigh him with Bhagat Singh, some with Ambedkar, some with Jinnah, some with Karl Marx, some with Mao.
Gandhi was not needed by Nehru, Patel or Maulana, but his relevance did not reduce even slightly
Despite all this, Gandhi remains the same, because of his role and philosophy. The same is the case with those people, by comparison, who make attempts to reduce the stature of Gandhi. The basic point is that Gandhi's role and philosophy cannot be undone by any government, party, or individual effort.
Modern industrial civilization is trapped in a vicious cycle of violence, counter -violence and acute indulgence with consumerism. The crisis of human civilization is spread everywhere - earth, sea and space. Millions of species of animals and plants have become extinct amidst voluptuousness of greed and material ambition. India itself is badly in the grip of this civilization.
Gandhi, especially in the midst of the horrors of Partition, himself felt that anti-humanity had won in spite of his best efforts to avoid it. But his faith in humanity was not shaken. He admitted:
"Whenever I am disappointed, I remember that truth and love have always triumphed in history. There were tyrants and murderers and for some time they also seemed to be invincible, but in the end, they were defeated ... Always remember this thing."
If we make a genuine effort, the relevance of Gandhi's existence will remain strong in spite of the false narratives. It is not necessary that everyone should understand the simple grandeur of Gandhi. But there is no need to get angry or take cudgels against such people. Gandhi was no longer needed by Nehru, Patel and Maulana.
But as we know, even then Gandhi's relevance was not diminished in the slightest manner. Had he not been murdered, he would have lived with the ordinary people of India and Pakistan, or in the jails of independent India and Pakistan while continuing to adhere to his role and philosophy!
The problem is not that the RSS distorts Gandhi. The problem lies with Gandhi's claimants. They can't explain why they need Gandhi. For ‘the last man’? But the truth is that by pushing back Gandhi's last man, they have brought in the 'aam aadmi'.
Their leader sits with pictures of Bhagat Singh and Ambedkar on his both sides. He knows that his ideal party, the RSS/BJP, will one day bring Gandhi down. But the point to realise is that despite even this, Gandhi's relevance will not end. Gandhi is not dependent on institutions and governments.
Why does India need to make a showpiece of Gandhi? If Gandhi is turned into a showpiece, then different leaders and governments will decorate and use him in their own way in the country as well as abroad. The Congress had been doing this very well for a long time.
The need is to follow the example of the real Gandhi. Then he will not be used in favour of Savarkar, nor in favour of corporate capitalism. Amidst the big talk of 'India of Gandhi's dreams', which continued so long, what big crime has the special issue of 'Antim Jan' committed?
---
*Associated with the socialist movement; former teacher at the Delhi University and fellow at the Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla

Comments

girdhar said…
The fuss can help inform generations of Indians ignorant of the history culture ideals of the struggle for Independence. Gandhians and others have betrayed so far, and scepticism about that is ok.

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Kailash Satyarthi NGO makes slum kids laud RSS founder Hedgewar as freedom fighter

By Rajiv Shah  In a move which may raise many an eyebrow, a Nobel laureate Kailash Satyarthi-supported child rights NGO has celebrated Prime Minister Narendra Modi-intitiated Har Ghar Tiranga by commemorating 75 freedom fighters by "narrating their famous deeds and chanting slogans of each leader", including Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose, Lala Lajpat Rai and a person who had little or nothing common with the freedom movement -- RSS founder Keshav Baliram Hedgewar. A communique from the Kailash Satyarthi Childrens Foundation (KSCF), which organised the event, said among the freedom fighters celebrated by 75 children on the occasion of 75 years of India's independence placing photographs of each freedom fighter included that of Hedgewar, who is alleged to have maintained a distance from Indian Independence movement led by Gandhiji. According to Hedgewar's biography, when Gandhiji launched the Salt Satyagraha in 1930, Hedgewar sent information ev

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

Golwalkar's views on tricolour, martyrs, minorities, caste as per RSS archives

By Shamsul Islam*  First time in the history of independent India, the in-charge minister of the Cultural Ministry in the current Modi government, Prahlad Singh Patel, has glorified MS Golwalkar, second supremo of the RSS and the most prominent ideologue of the RSS till date, on his birth anniversary, February 19. In a tweet he wrote : “Remembering a great thinker, scholar, and remarkable leader #MSGolwalkar on his birth anniversary. His thoughts will remain a source of inspiration & continue to guide generations.”

Gujarat's 'low-key' communalism: right-wing groups compete for anti-Muslim space

By Rajiv Shah  Noticing the emergence of a novel trend, a just-released report based on a fact-finding team's observations following its interaction in particular with Hindu and Muslim political activists, administrators and police officials, has claimed that a major reason why chasm between the two communities in Gujarat has lately reached new heights is, a veritable competition between Hindu right-wing groups and leaders to capture the existing communal space. Titled "Hindu Right, Communal Riots and Demolitions: Emerging Pattern of Communal Riots in India", the report has been prepared against the backdrop of what it calls "low intensity" communalism which has characterised rioting in Gujarat in the recent past, especially after the 2002 communal carnage, one of the worst in Independent India. Especially focusing on riots in two Gujarat towns, Himmatnagar and Khambhat, which took place on April 10, the day clashes broke also out in different parts of India on

Gujarat govt 'contradicts' MHA memo while freeing Bilkis Bano gangrape convicts

By Our Representative  The All-India Progressive Women's Association (AIPWA) has said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah "must answer for the decision to free Bilkis Bano's gang rapists." In a statement, AIPWA has wondered, "What was the basis of the Gujarat Government’s decision to free those men on August 15, 2022, to celebrate what the PM Modi calls India’s Amrit Kaal? Was remission and freedom a reward for rape and murder of Muslims?" The statement comes amidst an Ahmedabad-based legal rights non-pofit, which took up the cause of Bilkis Bano and fought her case right up to the Supreme Court, Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), suggesting that the Gujarat government move to allow remission to the convicts contradicts the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) Guidelines for Granting Special Remission to Prisoners on August 15, 2022 (75th anniversary of Independence), January 26, 2023, and again on August 15, 2023. Citing the MHA notificat

Need to ask at today's 'critical juncture' of India's history: Whose Freedom@75?

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The official propaganda states that: “Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav is an initiative of the Government of India to celebrate and commemorate 75 years of independence and the glorious history of it's people, culture and achievements. This Mahotsav is dedicated to the people of India who have not only been instrumental in bringing India thus far in its evolutionary journey but also hold within them the power and potential to enable Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision of activating India 2.0, fuelled by the spirit of Aatmanirbhar Bharat. The official journey of Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav commenced on 12th March 2021 which started a 75-week countdown to our 75th anniversary of independence and will end post a year on 15th August 2023.” So as India completes a landmark seventy-five years of freedom – a platinum jubilee – the only question one needs to ask at this critical juncture of the country’s history is “whose freedom@75?” Since March 2020, it has been a di

Har ghar tiranga: will the hungry bellies raise their hand to unfurl the national flag?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Indians are going to unfurl the tricolour to celebrate the 75th anniversary of India's Independence on 15th of August 2022. Indian freedom struggle has not only shaped India as a modern constitutional democracy but also shaped the nature of state, society and citizenship. The anti-colonial, anti-capitalist, anti-feudal and anti-imperialist struggle were the four pillars of Indian freedom struggle that laid the foundation of a sovereign nation state promised to pursue a society based on socialist, scientific and secular values to ensure egalitarian citizenship rights without any form of discrimination. These inalienable values are central to the unity, integrity, peace, prosperity and progress of India as a multicultural society and secular state. It is time to celebrate these values and promises of Indian independence, a product of struggles and sacrifice of millions of working-class people across the country. India at 75 is still a young nation but old e

RSS, Sangh Parivar consider tricolour as "state flag" and not "national flag"

By Teesta Setalvad* Today, when the nation has been independent for 67 years, the Sangh Parivar is set to launch ‘Tiranga yatras’ and Satyagrahas to defend the honour of the flag and the nation. Yet when the Indian people were involved in the decades-long struggle for freedom against British imperialism, the RSS was conspicuous by its absence in the struggle. When thousands of people faced lathis, bullets and jail sentences for hoisting the tiranga and participated all over the country in satyagraha during the Civil Disobedience and Quit India movements against the British Raj, the Sangh publicly took the stand that it would not take part in the movement and seldom missed the opportunity of assuring the British rulers that they would keep to the right side of colonial law and avoid any clash with the authorities. Of course the reason given for this was that the Sangh was secretly strengthening itself and would take on British imperialism only when it was strong enough to do so! A simil