Skip to main content

Ignoring land rights, forest dept 'harassing' tribal dwellers in the name of afforestation

Counterview Desk 

The civil rights group Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JJM) has regretted that despite the promises of the Chief Minister, deprivation of forest rights of Adivasis-Moolvasis of Jharkhand and the intimidation of the Forest Department continues unabated in the state. 
In a statement, JJM said, "It is sad to note that on one hand, Adivasis-Moolvasis are being alienated from their forest rights, while on the other hand, they are also being troubled constantly at the hands of the forest department."
Giving specific instances of how this is happening, JJM said, the state government should "stop the displacement of people from the Adivasis-Moolvasis land under the garb of afforestation", adding, not only should pending forest rights claims be cleared, the cases lodged against innocent persons by the Forest Department should be urgently withdrawn.

Text:

JMM and Congress in their election manifestoes had ensured the appropriate implementation of the Forest Rights Act. Additionally, the election manifesto also guaranteed the forest lease and comprehensive rights over the forests. After the current government came into power, there have been multiple announcements with respect to the same; however, the status of its implementation at the ground level is paradoxical.
According to the Schedules Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2006, communities that are dependent on the forest have numerous rights. One of these rights provides that the forest dwellers who have been doing farming for livelihood can qualify as the claimant for ownership of that land (4 hectares).
Since the implementation of this Act in 2008, the Forest Department has been making countless efforts to alienate these rights from them. In the initial days, there were various instances of cases lodged against Adivasis and Moolvasis along with instance of displacement under the garb of afforestation initiatives. It is sad to note that on one hand, Adivasis-Moolvasis are being alienated from their forest rights, while on the other hand, they are also being troubled constantly at the hands of the forest department.
Recently two of such instances came up. In Gadgoma village in Bariyatu block located in the Latehar district, 25 traditional forest dwellers after completing the due legal process along with the necessary records, submitted the application for individual forest leases and community forest rights at the (Sub-divisional level) Forest Rights Committee. However, they have not received neither individual leases nor community forest rights.
On 7th December 2021, a few representatives from the Forest Department arrived at Gadgoma with the intention for afforestation for which the application for the forest lease had been made. On protesting against this, the people were intimidated by the threat of cases being lodged against them. In 2022, on the orders of the forest department, pits began to be dug. On 11th February 2022, a few women from the village filled the pits back with mud. On the same evening, the police arrested 2 young men- Dinesh Rana s/o Pravesh Rana and Ranjan Rana s/o America Rana. When the villagers went for police picketing at Bariyatu, the police mishandled them. Charges of filling the mud pit/ditch and obstructing government work have been filed against the two men and their fathers. The two men have also been sent to jail. At the FIR filed by the forest department, the fathers of the two men have been declared as absconding despite their presence at the police station. The two men stayed in the jail for a month and their fathers live in constant fear of incarceration.
Section 4(5) of the Forest Rights Act 2006 has clearly specified that “(5) Save as otherwise provided, no member of a forest dwelling Scheduled Tribe or other traditional forest dweller shall be evicted or removed from forest land under his occupation till the recognition and verification procedure is complete.” From the above instances, it is clear that the forest department is in violation of the law.
These similar situations prevail in the Beyang village of the Manika block. 40 other traditional forest dwellers had made applications for individual leases in 2018 and for community forest rights in 2021. However, they have not received them yet.
In December 2021, afforestation initiatives began in the above said land. On 4th January 2022, villagers submitted a written complaint to the Forest Divisional Officer at Latehar that the afforestation had begun without the consent of the Gram Sabha. They requested not to proceed with the plantation on their traditional land. As they received no response from the office, the villagers visited the DFO. However, they only got reassurances while the work continued in their villages.
At last, a claimant from the Schedule Caste community, Kundan K. Bhuiya made an application for an FIR against the Forest Divisional Officer, other forest department officers and a few bullies in the village under The Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 166 of the Indian Penal Code. The station in charge refused to file an FIR. On 20th January 2022, the same was sent to the police station via registered post and with the help of the local MLA, the application was accepted on 23rd January 2022. Complaints regarding the same were also made to the police superintendent, but the FIR was never registered.
Similar instances have occurred at Shanti village in Baalumath block at Latehar district, Koyanjara and Chatakpur in Gumla, Bankheta and Sopahi in Ramna block of Garhwa district, Bishunia in Dhurki block, Ramar in Bhandaria block, Mahugain etc. These are only a handful of examples that depicts the situation of Adivasis-Moolvasis who are dependent on the forest and the working of the Forest Rights Act. Claims for lakhs of individual forest rights and thousands of acres of community forest land are pending. There is a huge gap between the promises of the Chief Minister and the proceedings of the Forest Department.
Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha has the following demands from the State Government:
  • Stop the displacement of people from the Adivasis-Moolvasis land under the garb of afforestation
  • Urgent addressal of the pending forest rights claims and issuing the Forest Rights Claim
  • Withdrawal of the cases lodged against innocent persons by the Forest Department. Legal actions to be taken against the officials of the Forest Department for the violation of the forest and human rights of Adivasis-Moolvasis
  • Stop the illegal interference of the forest department officials in the process of implementation of the forest rights

Comments

TRENDING

Bill Gates as funder, author, editor, adviser? Data imperialism: manipulating the metrics

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  When Mahatma Gandhi on invitation from Buckingham Palace was invited to have tea with King George V, he was asked, “Mr Gandhi, do you think you are properly dressed to meet the King?” Gandhi retorted, “Do not worry about my clothes. The King has enough clothes on for both of us.”

What's Bill Gates up to? Have 'irregularities' found in funding HPV vaccine trials faded?

By Colin Gonsalves*  After having read the 72nd report of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on alleged irregularities in the conduct of studies using HPV vaccines by PATH in India, it was startling to see Bill Gates bobbing his head up and down and smiling ingratiatingly on prime time television while the Prime Minister lectured him in Hindi on his plans for the country. 

Displaced from Bangladesh, Buddhist, Hindu groups without citizenship in Arunachal

By Sharma Lohit  Buddhist Chakma and Hindu Hajongs were settled in the 1960s in parts of Changlang and Papum Pare district of Arunachal Pradesh after they had fled Chittagong Hill Tracts of present Bangladesh following an ethnic clash and a dam disaster. Their original population was around 5,000, but at present, it is said to be close to one lakh.

Muted profit margins, moderate increase in costs and sales: IIM-A survey of 1000 cos

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad’s (IIM-A's) latest Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES) has said that the cost perceptions data obtained from India’s business executives suggests that there is “mild increase in cost pressures”.

Anti-Rupala Rajputs 'have no support' of numerically strong Kshatriya communities

By Rajiv Shah  Personally, I have no love lost for Purshottam Rupala, though I have known him ever since I was posted as the Times of India representative in Gandhinagar in 1997, from where I was supposed to do political reporting. In news after he made the statement that 'maharajas' succumbed to foreign rulers, including the British, and even married off their daughters them, there have been large Rajput rallies against him for “insulting” the community.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Govt putting India's professionals, skilled, unskilled labour 'at mercy of' big business

By Thomas Franco, Dinesh Abrol*  As it is impossible to refute the report of the International Labour Organisation, Chief Economic Advisor Anantha Nageswaran recently said that the government cannot solve all social, economic problems like unemployment and social security. He blamed the youth for not acquiring enough skills to get employment. Then can’t the people ask, ‘Why do we have a government? Is it not the government’s responsibility to provide adequate employment to its citizens?’

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Youth as game changers in Lok Sabha polls? Young voter registration 'is so very low'

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Young voters will be the game changers in 2024. Do they realise this? Does it matter to them? If it does, what they should/must vote for? India’s population of nearly 1.3 billion has about one-fifth 19.1% as youth. With 66% of its population (808 million) below the age of 35, India has the world's largest youth population. Among them, less than 40% of those who turned 18 or 19 have registered themselves for 2024 election. According to the Election Commission of India (ECI), just above 1.8 crore new voters (18-and 19-year-olds) are on the electoral rolls/registration out of the total projected 4.9 crore new voters in this age group.

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).