Skip to main content

Increasing tendency to punish petitioners raises 'expert eyebrows' across India

Himanshu Kumar, Teesta Setalvad
By Bharat Dogra* 
In June 2021 the Delhi High Court passed a judgment on a petition filed by leading film actor Juhi Chawla. She had filed a petition against hasty roll-out of 5G Technology. While anyone may agree or disagree with this, the fact remains that hundreds of scientists worldwide have been warning on the same issue that Juhi Chawla had taken to court, citing evidence of serious health hazards.
The judgment dismissed this petition but also said that this petition was an effort to gain publicity and imposed a fine of Rs 20 lakh on Juhi Chawla. The court order said, the suit is dismissed. Plaintiffs abused the process of law. Cost of Rs 20 lakh is imposed on plaintiffs.
This tendency to punish the petitioner has been increasing and is a cause of great concern for all those concerned with justice and human rights in India. Let us look at two more recent cases which have increased these worries.
In June 2022 in a judgment on the Zakia Jafri petition in which Teesta Setalvad was a co-petitioner(Zakia’s husband, a former Member of Parliament, had been killed in the 2002 Gujarat riots and Teesta Setalvad is a well-known human rights activist who has been helping victims of communal violence for several years), the Supreme Court accused the complainants of making false claims and an attempt to create sensation, then added, “As a matter of fact, all those involved in such abuse of process need to be in the dock and proceeded against in accordance with law.”
This was promptly followed by the actual arrest of Setalvad and senior former police officer RB Sreekumar who had played an important role in exposing facts about the Gujarat riots.
Former Supreme Court judge Madan Lokur commented on this judgment in an interview, “I think it is very, very unfortunate.” He added that the Supreme Court should issue a clarification that the intention of the judgment was not to lead to the arrest which followed. This clarification did not come.
When asked about the possibility of arrest being intended, he said, in that case “heaven help us.” He found it very troubling that if a litigant goes to court and does not succeed, then the litigant is in trouble. He also said that the judgment has also made it difficult for Teesta to get bail. He said, “In view of the observations of the Supreme Court, it is going to be very, very difficult for a judge to grant her bail.”
Senior columnist Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar wrote,“The verdict has been castigated by hundreds of eminent persons for turning the tables on petitioners for justice and treating them as the accused, not accusers.” The columnist also reminded readers that in the past functioning as well as retired Supreme Court judges had also criticized the role of the state government at the time of the 2002 Gujarat riots in very strong terms.
In the third such instance, in July 2022, the Supreme Court ordered activist Himanshu Kumar to pay a fine of Rs 5 lakh while dismissing his public interest litigation related to the killing of 16 tribals in Dantewada, Chattisgarh. The incident goes back to 2009.
Justice Madan Lokur
Going by the somewhat distant memories of those times, one can say that several troubling human rights violations were being reported from this state during those times and against this background, the stand taken by Himanshu had attracted support and sympathy. In the debates of those days, he was seen as a Gandhian activist who was working, along with his wife, in very difficult conditions with a lot of courage. In fact the office of his own voluntary organization had faced demolition.
He may have been mistaken or he may have been correct about the allegations he made, but it is highly unlikely that he knowingly said anything that was false. From a common sense point of view, it appears highly unlikely that a social activist working in the most difficult conditions would antagonize the most powerful on the basis of lies and fabrications. From all accounts available, he comes across as sincere, courageous and willing to undergo great hardships for what he believes to correct.
In his comment after the judgment Himanshu has stated that the court has asked for a big fine to be paid by him and for further proceedings against him. He has stated that he does not have the money to pay even a fraction of the fine imposed on him and in any case to pay the fine is to admit that he had done something wrong in seeking justice which was not the case.
As a leading editorial (July 16, “SC penalizing the petitioner is unjust”) commenting on the judgment and the trend of this case as well as the Setalvad case to punish the petitioners, states, “The Court’s heavy fine sends a chilling signal to all those who would knock on its door in future armed with nothing more than a plea against the state.” Further the editorial asserts, “The imposition of penalty on the petitioner in the Dantewada case is part of an emerging judicial pattern.”
The implications of this are very disturbing for the cause of justice and the pursuit of public interest as anyone seeking to knock on the doors of justice would have to worry also about facing fines or even imprisonment. Hence this trend of punishing the petitioner should be checked in the interests of justice.
As the editorial says, “The Supreme Court must reflect on this worrisome inversion and call a halt to it before it does more damage to its hard won reputation as the upholder of the constitutional checks and balances.”
---
*Honorary convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now; recent books include ‘A Day in 2071’, ‘Planet in Peril’ and ‘Man over Machine’

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Kailash Satyarthi NGO makes slum kids laud RSS founder Hedgewar as freedom fighter

By Rajiv Shah  In a move which may raise many an eyebrow, a Nobel laureate Kailash Satyarthi-supported child rights NGO has celebrated Prime Minister Narendra Modi-intitiated Har Ghar Tiranga by commemorating 75 freedom fighters by "narrating their famous deeds and chanting slogans of each leader", including Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose, Lala Lajpat Rai and a person who had little or nothing common with the freedom movement -- RSS founder Keshav Baliram Hedgewar. A communique from the Kailash Satyarthi Childrens Foundation (KSCF), which organised the event, said among the freedom fighters celebrated by 75 children on the occasion of 75 years of India's independence placing photographs of each freedom fighter included that of Hedgewar, who is alleged to have maintained a distance from Indian Independence movement led by Gandhiji. According to Hedgewar's biography, when Gandhiji launched the Salt Satyagraha in 1930, Hedgewar sent information ev

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

Golwalkar's views on tricolour, martyrs, minorities, caste as per RSS archives

By Shamsul Islam*  First time in the history of independent India, the in-charge minister of the Cultural Ministry in the current Modi government, Prahlad Singh Patel, has glorified MS Golwalkar, second supremo of the RSS and the most prominent ideologue of the RSS till date, on his birth anniversary, February 19. In a tweet he wrote : “Remembering a great thinker, scholar, and remarkable leader #MSGolwalkar on his birth anniversary. His thoughts will remain a source of inspiration & continue to guide generations.”

Gujarat's 'low-key' communalism: right-wing groups compete for anti-Muslim space

By Rajiv Shah  Noticing the emergence of a novel trend, a just-released report based on a fact-finding team's observations following its interaction in particular with Hindu and Muslim political activists, administrators and police officials, has claimed that a major reason why chasm between the two communities in Gujarat has lately reached new heights is, a veritable competition between Hindu right-wing groups and leaders to capture the existing communal space. Titled "Hindu Right, Communal Riots and Demolitions: Emerging Pattern of Communal Riots in India", the report has been prepared against the backdrop of what it calls "low intensity" communalism which has characterised rioting in Gujarat in the recent past, especially after the 2002 communal carnage, one of the worst in Independent India. Especially focusing on riots in two Gujarat towns, Himmatnagar and Khambhat, which took place on April 10, the day clashes broke also out in different parts of India on

Gujarat govt 'contradicts' MHA memo while freeing Bilkis Bano gangrape convicts

By Our Representative  The All-India Progressive Women's Association (AIPWA) has said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah "must answer for the decision to free Bilkis Bano's gang rapists." In a statement, AIPWA has wondered, "What was the basis of the Gujarat Government’s decision to free those men on August 15, 2022, to celebrate what the PM Modi calls India’s Amrit Kaal? Was remission and freedom a reward for rape and murder of Muslims?" The statement comes amidst an Ahmedabad-based legal rights non-pofit, which took up the cause of Bilkis Bano and fought her case right up to the Supreme Court, Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), suggesting that the Gujarat government move to allow remission to the convicts contradicts the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) Guidelines for Granting Special Remission to Prisoners on August 15, 2022 (75th anniversary of Independence), January 26, 2023, and again on August 15, 2023. Citing the MHA notificat

Need to ask at today's 'critical juncture' of India's history: Whose Freedom@75?

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The official propaganda states that: “Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav is an initiative of the Government of India to celebrate and commemorate 75 years of independence and the glorious history of it's people, culture and achievements. This Mahotsav is dedicated to the people of India who have not only been instrumental in bringing India thus far in its evolutionary journey but also hold within them the power and potential to enable Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision of activating India 2.0, fuelled by the spirit of Aatmanirbhar Bharat. The official journey of Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav commenced on 12th March 2021 which started a 75-week countdown to our 75th anniversary of independence and will end post a year on 15th August 2023.” So as India completes a landmark seventy-five years of freedom – a platinum jubilee – the only question one needs to ask at this critical juncture of the country’s history is “whose freedom@75?” Since March 2020, it has been a di

Har ghar tiranga: will the hungry bellies raise their hand to unfurl the national flag?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Indians are going to unfurl the tricolour to celebrate the 75th anniversary of India's Independence on 15th of August 2022. Indian freedom struggle has not only shaped India as a modern constitutional democracy but also shaped the nature of state, society and citizenship. The anti-colonial, anti-capitalist, anti-feudal and anti-imperialist struggle were the four pillars of Indian freedom struggle that laid the foundation of a sovereign nation state promised to pursue a society based on socialist, scientific and secular values to ensure egalitarian citizenship rights without any form of discrimination. These inalienable values are central to the unity, integrity, peace, prosperity and progress of India as a multicultural society and secular state. It is time to celebrate these values and promises of Indian independence, a product of struggles and sacrifice of millions of working-class people across the country. India at 75 is still a young nation but old e

RSS, Sangh Parivar consider tricolour as "state flag" and not "national flag"

By Teesta Setalvad* Today, when the nation has been independent for 67 years, the Sangh Parivar is set to launch ‘Tiranga yatras’ and Satyagrahas to defend the honour of the flag and the nation. Yet when the Indian people were involved in the decades-long struggle for freedom against British imperialism, the RSS was conspicuous by its absence in the struggle. When thousands of people faced lathis, bullets and jail sentences for hoisting the tiranga and participated all over the country in satyagraha during the Civil Disobedience and Quit India movements against the British Raj, the Sangh publicly took the stand that it would not take part in the movement and seldom missed the opportunity of assuring the British rulers that they would keep to the right side of colonial law and avoid any clash with the authorities. Of course the reason given for this was that the Sangh was secretly strengthening itself and would take on British imperialism only when it was strong enough to do so! A simil