Skip to main content

No probe? Bangladeshi women detained in West Bengal 'victims of human trafficking'

Counterview Desk  
Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM),  and National Convenor, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), Hooghly, has brought to light two cases of Bangladeshi women, who were treated as accused "without proper investigation" by the police and the Border Security Force (BSF) whether they were victims of human trafficking, for which there is an agreement between India and Bangladesh.
"The police or BSF personnel or the concern court must initiate to investigate whether those Bangladeshi persons are the victims of human trafficking or not", Roy said in a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). He insiste that the victims should be "immediately repatriated to their own country and the criminal charges against them must be withdrawn". 

Text:

I am writing this complaint regarding detention of Bangladeshi women in West Bengal and accusing and treating them as criminals under Foreigners Act, 1946. For a long time MASUM has been trying to bring this systematic violation of laws by the BSF and police administration into light by making numerous complaints to the NHRC and other relevant departments. The authorities including police and Border Security Force are not at all concerned to initiate proper investigation into whether the persons including women and children crossed the border from Bangladesh to India were the victims of human trafficking or not. Here I am appending two case details for your perusal.

Case 1: 

In connection with Swarupnagar Police Station Case no. 447/2022 dated 04/05/2022 under section 14/14 C of Foreigners Act, the following Bangladeshi women were arrested:
1. Ms. Nasima Begum, daughter of Hussain Seikh, Aged - 35 years, residential address: - Village – Katani Para, Post Office – Sanhati, P.S – Degolia, District - Khulna, Bangladesh.
2. Ms. Yasmin Begum, wife of Kamal Mridha, Aged 28 years, residential address: - Village – Katani Para, Post Office – Sanhati, P.S – Degolia, District - Khulna, Bangladesh.
Both the victims are Bangladeshi nationals, who were trying to return back Bangladesh from India on 04.05.2022 at around 5.10 p.m. when they were apprehended by BSF personnel attached with B coy of 112 Battalion, Amudia BOP and later handed over to the Swarupnagar Police Station. Swarupnagar PS registered an FIR in this regard. On the next day those victims were produced before the Basirhat Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court. 
The magistrate sent them to the Dum Dum Central Correctional Home for 14 day jail custody. From the letter of the BSF it revealed that Nasima along with Yasmin came to India in 2021 and last one year they worked as domestic helpers in Mumbai for livelihood. As per the Article number 2 under II definition MoU of between the Government of the India and the Government of of Bangladesh on Bilateral Cooperation for Preventing of Human Trafficking, especially trafficking in women and children, signed by both countries on 30th May 2015, trafficking in women and children shall mean selling, buying, recruitment, receipt, transportation, transfer or harbouring of any person for the purpose of sexual exploitation, labour exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery servitude or the removal of the organs or any other form of exploitation. 
Then how are these two victims treated as accused?
From the accused challan it is understood that during the time of production of those women victims before the judicial magistrate, two male escort party members constable No 396 Mr. Manchi Mondal and constable no. 197 Biswajit Naskar took them before the Basirhat court which is 19 kilometers far from the Swarupnagar police station. Why any female constable was not present at the escort party? 
Here the incident occurred and apprehension of those accused persons by the BSF on 04.05.2022 at about 17.10 hrs but BSF informed the police after 6 hours i.e, at 23.15 hrs dated 04.05.2022. For 6 hours these women victims were under BSF custody whereas the distance between the said BOP and the police station is 15 kilometers. 
General rule is BSF has to inform the concerned police regarding the apprehension of any accused as early as possible after his apprehension. According to the requisition letter of FIR of the BSF, Mr. Arif Billa Gazi, attached with SANLAAP NGO, did counseling to the accused women and confirmed that the accused persons are not trafficked victims. 
Through our fact findings it reveals that Mr. Arif Billa is a social worker of SANLAAP who does not have the counseling expertise. Then how the BSF personnel claimed in a written document that the aforesaid case is not a case of trafficking? In addition, just after apprehension the counseling should not be done because at that time the victims are highly traumatized.

Case 2:

In connection with Swarupnagar Police Station Case no. 445/2022 dated 04.05.2022 under section 14 of Foreigners Act, the following Bangladeshi woman along with her lap baby were arrested:
1. Ms. Farjana Begum, wife of Mujaydul Islam Aged - 20 years, residential address: - Village – Pratapnagar, Post Office – Nakna, P.S – Ashshwani, District - Satkhira, Bangladesh along with her lap baby namely Muslima Akhtar, Aged – 18 months.
The victims were the Bangladeshi nationals, who were trying to enter India from Bangladesh on 04.05.2022 at around 05:30 p.m when they were apprehended by BSF personnel attached with A coy of 112 Battalion, Tarali BOP and later handed over to the Swarupnagar Police Station. The victims were produced before the Basirhat ACJM court on 05.05.2022 and sent to the Dumdum Central Correctional Home for 14-day jail custody.
Here the incident occurred and apprehension of those accused persons by the BSF on 04.05.2022 at about 17.30 hrs but BSF informed the police after more than 5 hours i.e, at 22.35 hrs dated 04.05.2022 but reason behind this delay was not mentioned anywhere. For more than 5 hours that woman, including her lap baby, was under BSF custody. 
Police or BSF or the concerned court never attempted to investigate if the Bangladeshi persons were victims of human trafficking
General rule is BSF inform the concerned police regarding the apprehension of any accused as early as possible after his apprehension. In this case also during the time of production of those victims before the judicial magistrate, two male escort party members constable No. 396 Mr. Manchi Mondal and constable no. 197 Biswajit Naskar took them before the Basirhat court which is 19 kilometers far from the Swarupnagar police station. No female constable was present at the escort party.
Through our fact finding it reveals that in both the cases the victim women including a lap baby were forwarded to ACJM court at Basirhat from Swarupnagar police station which is about 19 kilometers far from the Swarupnagar police station, by male police personnel not by female police. The arrested Bangladeshi women entered India for the purpose of working in India as they are terribly poverty-stricken people with no jobs in Bangladesh.
According to the office memorandum of the Ministry of Home Affairs (Foreigners Division) Government of India Dated 1st May, 2012 it clearly instructed about the procedure of dealing with the victims of trafficking. The memorandum stated that if the women and children victims were found without a valid passport or visa then they have to repatriate to their country of origin through diplomatic channels. 
Till the repatriation they must be kept in an appropriate children’s home, or “Ujjawala” home or appropriate shelter home. In reality, police or BSF personnel or the concerned court never attempt to initiate to investigate whether those Bangladeshi persons are the victims of human trafficking or not. Additionally, the victims are kept in the correctional home. 
From other several instances it also found that the people of Bangladesh illegally enter India for the purpose of medical treatment as they have very limited facilities in their native place. Cross border trafficking is very organized crime where touts or middlemen are operating this crime in connivance with border guards of both sides, India and Bangladesh. These helpless Bangladeshi persons enter India for better livelihood or for medical treatment purposes but when they are arrested; they are treated as accused under the Foreigners Act.
This approach is also violating the Article 6, 7, 8, 11 and 12 of the MoU between The Government of of India and the Government of of Bangladesh on Bilateral Cooperation for Preventing of Human Trafficking, especially trafficking in women and children; signed by both countries on 30th May 2015.
The incidents are not only violating the advisory of Government of India but in violation of Goal Number 16 of Sustainable Development Goals of UN, Government of India is a party to set the goals and obliged to adhere to the same.
Under the circumstances I request your urgent intervention in this case to bring justice to the victims by taking the necessary actions:
  • The police or BSF personnel or the concern court must initiate to investigate whether those Bangladeshi persons are the victims of human trafficking or not
  • The victim persons including the child should be immediately repatriated to their own country and the criminal charges against them must be withdrawn at the earliest
  • The victim persons including child should be transferred to a appropriate home from the Dumdum correctional home at the earliest
  • Government should initiate to conduct sensitization program for police personnel, BSF personnel and other legal authorities on area of human rights, trafficking, repatriation and restoration
  • The matters must be handled by the police or the BSF personnel with the humanities

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Kailash Satyarthi NGO makes slum kids laud RSS founder Hedgewar as freedom fighter

By Rajiv Shah  In a move which may raise many an eyebrow, a Nobel laureate Kailash Satyarthi-supported child rights NGO has celebrated Prime Minister Narendra Modi-intitiated Har Ghar Tiranga by commemorating 75 freedom fighters by "narrating their famous deeds and chanting slogans of each leader", including Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhas Chandra Bose, Lala Lajpat Rai and a person who had little or nothing common with the freedom movement -- RSS founder Keshav Baliram Hedgewar. A communique from the Kailash Satyarthi Childrens Foundation (KSCF), which organised the event, said among the freedom fighters celebrated by 75 children on the occasion of 75 years of India's independence placing photographs of each freedom fighter included that of Hedgewar, who is alleged to have maintained a distance from Indian Independence movement led by Gandhiji. According to Hedgewar's biography, when Gandhiji launched the Salt Satyagraha in 1930, Hedgewar sent information ev

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Hindutva icon wrote 5 mercy petitions to British masters

By Shamsul Islam*  The Hindutva icon VD Savarkar of the RSS-BJP rulers of India submitted not one, two,or three but five mercy petitions to the British masters! Savarkarites argue: “There are no evidences to prove that Savarkar collaborated with the British for his release from jail. In fact, his appeal for release was a ruse. He was well aware of the political developments outside and wanted to be part of it. So he kept requesting for his release. But the British authorities did not trust him a bit” (YD Phadke, ‘A complex Hero’, "The Indian Expres"s, August 31, 2004)

Golwalkar's views on tricolour, martyrs, minorities, caste as per RSS archives

By Shamsul Islam*  First time in the history of independent India, the in-charge minister of the Cultural Ministry in the current Modi government, Prahlad Singh Patel, has glorified MS Golwalkar, second supremo of the RSS and the most prominent ideologue of the RSS till date, on his birth anniversary, February 19. In a tweet he wrote : “Remembering a great thinker, scholar, and remarkable leader #MSGolwalkar on his birth anniversary. His thoughts will remain a source of inspiration & continue to guide generations.”

Gujarat's 'low-key' communalism: right-wing groups compete for anti-Muslim space

By Rajiv Shah  Noticing the emergence of a novel trend, a just-released report based on a fact-finding team's observations following its interaction in particular with Hindu and Muslim political activists, administrators and police officials, has claimed that a major reason why chasm between the two communities in Gujarat has lately reached new heights is, a veritable competition between Hindu right-wing groups and leaders to capture the existing communal space. Titled "Hindu Right, Communal Riots and Demolitions: Emerging Pattern of Communal Riots in India", the report has been prepared against the backdrop of what it calls "low intensity" communalism which has characterised rioting in Gujarat in the recent past, especially after the 2002 communal carnage, one of the worst in Independent India. Especially focusing on riots in two Gujarat towns, Himmatnagar and Khambhat, which took place on April 10, the day clashes broke also out in different parts of India on

Gujarat govt 'contradicts' MHA memo while freeing Bilkis Bano gangrape convicts

By Our Representative  The All-India Progressive Women's Association (AIPWA) has said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah "must answer for the decision to free Bilkis Bano's gang rapists." In a statement, AIPWA has wondered, "What was the basis of the Gujarat Government’s decision to free those men on August 15, 2022, to celebrate what the PM Modi calls India’s Amrit Kaal? Was remission and freedom a reward for rape and murder of Muslims?" The statement comes amidst an Ahmedabad-based legal rights non-pofit, which took up the cause of Bilkis Bano and fought her case right up to the Supreme Court, Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), suggesting that the Gujarat government move to allow remission to the convicts contradicts the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) Guidelines for Granting Special Remission to Prisoners on August 15, 2022 (75th anniversary of Independence), January 26, 2023, and again on August 15, 2023. Citing the MHA notificat

Need to ask at today's 'critical juncture' of India's history: Whose Freedom@75?

By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  The official propaganda states that: “Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav is an initiative of the Government of India to celebrate and commemorate 75 years of independence and the glorious history of it's people, culture and achievements. This Mahotsav is dedicated to the people of India who have not only been instrumental in bringing India thus far in its evolutionary journey but also hold within them the power and potential to enable Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision of activating India 2.0, fuelled by the spirit of Aatmanirbhar Bharat. The official journey of Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav commenced on 12th March 2021 which started a 75-week countdown to our 75th anniversary of independence and will end post a year on 15th August 2023.” So as India completes a landmark seventy-five years of freedom – a platinum jubilee – the only question one needs to ask at this critical juncture of the country’s history is “whose freedom@75?” Since March 2020, it has been a di

Har ghar tiranga: will the hungry bellies raise their hand to unfurl the national flag?

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  Indians are going to unfurl the tricolour to celebrate the 75th anniversary of India's Independence on 15th of August 2022. Indian freedom struggle has not only shaped India as a modern constitutional democracy but also shaped the nature of state, society and citizenship. The anti-colonial, anti-capitalist, anti-feudal and anti-imperialist struggle were the four pillars of Indian freedom struggle that laid the foundation of a sovereign nation state promised to pursue a society based on socialist, scientific and secular values to ensure egalitarian citizenship rights without any form of discrimination. These inalienable values are central to the unity, integrity, peace, prosperity and progress of India as a multicultural society and secular state. It is time to celebrate these values and promises of Indian independence, a product of struggles and sacrifice of millions of working-class people across the country. India at 75 is still a young nation but old e

RSS, Sangh Parivar consider tricolour as "state flag" and not "national flag"

By Teesta Setalvad* Today, when the nation has been independent for 67 years, the Sangh Parivar is set to launch ‘Tiranga yatras’ and Satyagrahas to defend the honour of the flag and the nation. Yet when the Indian people were involved in the decades-long struggle for freedom against British imperialism, the RSS was conspicuous by its absence in the struggle. When thousands of people faced lathis, bullets and jail sentences for hoisting the tiranga and participated all over the country in satyagraha during the Civil Disobedience and Quit India movements against the British Raj, the Sangh publicly took the stand that it would not take part in the movement and seldom missed the opportunity of assuring the British rulers that they would keep to the right side of colonial law and avoid any clash with the authorities. Of course the reason given for this was that the Sangh was secretly strengthening itself and would take on British imperialism only when it was strong enough to do so! A simil