Skip to main content

Hariyali Mahotsav? Govt lacks commitment towards making environment 'green'

Counterview Desk 
Taking strong exception to the propaganda around Hariyali Mahotsav, Shankar Sharma, power and climate policy analyst, in a letter to Bhupender Yadav, Union Minister for Environment, Forests and Climate Change, has said that statements by our political leaders and ministers calling for the protection/ enhancement of our forests, natural resources and biodiversity are not serious because of the perception of "lack of honesty" behind such moves.
The letter, whose copy has been sent to the Prime Minister members of the Union Cabinet, and the vice chairperson, NITI Aayog, insists, "There should be commitment at all levels of the government not to divert any forest land until at least till the total forest and tree cover in the country reaches the 33% target set by the national forest policy."

Text:

This has reference to the posting on PIB website stating that "Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change celebrates Hariyali Mahotsav – Tree Festival". It also has stated: "India has demonstrated to the world the essence of mindful consumption of resources: Shri Bhupender Yadav".
May I please be excused to state that many statements and developments attributed to the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) have never stopped amusing the environmentalists in the country. 
 It is not at all clear as to which section of our populations is expected to be positively influenced by celebrations such as 'Desertification and Drought Day', 'Hariyali Mahotsav', 'Environment Day' etc. in the present age of wanton destruction of our forests encouraged/ permitted by MoEF&CC and other govt. agencies.
It is hard to notice any honest commitment by most of the agencies of the government to make the environment green and highlighted that protection of rivers, mountains and environment, as in the statement: "Union Minister of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Shri Bhupender Yadav, called the nation forward to make the environment green and highlighted that protection of rivers, mountains and environment is a deeply embedded Indian sentiment as inscribed in our national song ‘Vande Mataram’".
It is in such a larger context, that I may please be excused to say that many such statements by our political leaders and ministers of the day calling for the protection/ enhancement of our forests, natural resources and biodiversity are unlikely to be taken seriously by our people because of the perception of lack of honesty behind most of such unsubstantiated statements.
Whereas, it is necessary that every one of us should focus on protecting each tree and also grow more, what is alarming is the fact that the state and union governments are directly/indirectly responsible for cutting an enormous number of mature trees every year on one or the other pretext. 
 According to a study by the World Resources Institute (WRI) the country lost about 1.6 million hectares of tree cover, and 16 million trees, between 2001 and 2018, of which 9.4 million trees were felled in just the last 5-6 years. 
In such a deplorable scenario, it should be seen as totally a lost cause to expect civil society to make up for such unquantifiable losses by planting a few thousand road side tree saplings, which do not enjoy the necessary protection subsequently. Planting of tree saplings, or monoculture species, or growing plantation crops can never replace the ecological wealth of mature and tropical natural forests.
About 25 linear project proposals in the Western Ghats of Karnataka, which are being planned/ implemented should be paused
Hence, it must be stated that if we are serious about our environment/ ecology, the first step is to protect the existing natural forests; especially within the Protected Areas (PAs); and to take all possible measures to ensure the enhancement of the forest cover at least to 30% of the total land area of the country by 2030. 
This should be done by enhancing the area under PAs status to at least 10% of the country's land area before 2030. There should be commitment at all levels of the government not to divert any forest land until at least till the total forest and tree cover in the country reaches the 33% target set by the national forest policy.
One way of moving towards these goals is to heed to the recommendations of an expert committee by the Supreme Court of India with regard to the credible valuation of tropical trees in India. It should be noted that few months ago the Supreme Court took judicial notice of its expert committee report, which said the felling of 300 heritage trees to construct five railway over-bridges in West Bengal will cost India a staggering ₹2,23,50,00,000 (₹2.2 billion).
The Union government should take this valuation seriously, and make it a part of the rule to mandate the recovery of such costs per tree (which comes to about Rs 75 lakh per tree) from those agencies who seek to cut trees for whatever reasons.
Additionally, the large number of project proposals (such as about 25 such linear project proposals in the Western Ghats of Karnataka alone), which are being planned/ implemented should be paused, diligently reviewed, and cancelled where feasible.
Can people of this country expect the Union government to exhibit such commitment to protect our environment?

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.
Post a Comment
»

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”
Post a Comment
»

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.
Post a Comment
»

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.
Post a Comment
»

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.
Post a Comment
»

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.
Post a Comment
»

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...
2 comments
»

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).
Post a Comment
»

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative   The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.
Post a Comment
»