Skip to main content

'Violation of Apex Court order': Delhi authorities blamed for dog-bite incidents at JLN Stadium

By A Representative
 
People for Animals (PFA), led by Ms. Ambika Shukla, has held the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) responsible for the recent dog-bite incidents at Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, accusing it of violating Supreme Court directions regarding community dogs. The organisation’s on-ground fact-finding mission met stadium authorities and the two affected coaches to verify details surrounding the incidents, both of which occurred on October 3.
According to PFA, the MCD’s dog-catching drive that began on September 25 deviated sharply from established protocols followed during previous events. Earlier, all resident dogs were barricaded within a designated area under the supervision of caretakers. This time, the MCD acted without involving them, capturing only 11 dogs and moving them to a facility while others fled. The statement alleges that the partial removal of resident dogs created a “vacuum,” drawing in unfamiliar stray dogs from outside the premises, particularly attracted by food stalls. These new dogs, anxious and unacclimatised, reacted fearfully amid continued catching operations, leading to the bite incidents.
Both injured coaches reportedly identified the same black-and-white dog as the one responsible, describing it as a frightened animal being chased. PFA emphasised that this dog was not among the resident dogs of the stadium, which have lived there peacefully for over three decades under the care of a team headed by a retired school principal. The organisation added that no previous bite had ever been reported from these sterilised and vaccinated dogs, accustomed to high footfall and human activity.
PFA’s statement stressed that CCTV footage confirmed the 11 returned dogs remained confined behind barricades during the incidents. The group accused the MCD of “unscientific handling” and “performative optics,” arguing that its actions had compromised athlete safety rather than ensuring it.
“The unfortunate incidents were a direct result of unscientific handling by the municipality and its blatant violation of Supreme Court directions not to remove friendly, sterilised dogs from their areas,” the statement said.
PFA has demanded accountability from the civic body and urged it to reinstate the sterilised resident dogs as territorial buffers while working with caregivers instead of resorting to further round-ups. The organisation reiterated that public safety “is not achieved through fear but through collaboration, science, and responsibility.”

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Sachivalaya blacklists, denies entry to woman social activist: Will NHRC probe?

By Kantilal Parmar*  I have approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) seeking an independent, impartial, and transparent investigation into a serious incident that took place at the Gujarat Secretariat in Gandhinagar on August 18, 2026. The matter concerns social activist and women’s rights leader Chandrikaben Solanki, who, according to the information available to me, was denied an entry pass to the Secretariat when she went there to meet Gujarat’s Social Justice and Empowerment Minister, Dr. Manishaben Vakil, to raise an issue concerning social justice.

Tibetan activist’s self-immolation sparks fresh concerns over cultural rights

By Kumar Krishnan*  The question of Tibet has once again entered international discourse, raising difficult questions about human rights, religious freedom, cultural identity, language, and the relationship between political power and the rights of indigenous communities. On 20 August 2026, the Kashag and the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile jointly organised a solidarity prayer service and peace march to mark the 49th day since the death of Lobga Rangzen, a Tibetan activist who died after self-immolating on 2 July in front of the United Nations Headquarters in New York.

IMF's policies 'stabilise' external creditors' balance sheets, 'generate' crisis in Africa

By Grieve Chelwa, Vijay Prashad   Across Africa, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) presents itself as the custodian of macroeconomic stability. Its latest Article IV staff reports on Ethiopia . Malawi , Nigeria , South Africa , and Zambia are written for economies with very different histories and institutions. Yet they converge on a familiar prescription: fiscal consolidation, tighter monetary policy, market-determined exchange rates, subsidy reform, deregulation and ‘private-sector-led growth’. No serious economist can dismiss macroeconomic stability.