Skip to main content

Why dollar's hegemony is not just an economic issue: it is a device of power

By Jaime Bravo, Jorge Coulon
 
In August 1971, Richard Nixon announced the suspension of the dollar's convertibility into gold. This closed a cycle that had begun with the Bretton Woods agreements, which gave the United States — the only industrial and financial power to emerge with its capabilities intact and as a creditor to the rest of the world— the possibility of making its currency the global reserve of value.
But even with that American weight, it had to compromise on gold backing and, to do so, concentrate the reserves of Western countries. No one was willing to hand over the reserve currency printing press to a single country.
With the gesture of breaking convertibility —the so-called Nixon Shock— the Bretton Woods system that had provided stability to international trade since the end of World War II collapsed. The gold standard, which guaranteed that each dollar could be exchanged for a fixed amount of precious metal, was left behind. Since then, the dollar has been sustained solely by “confidence” in the US economy and the political and military power that backs it.
But that's not all. Coercion to force its use led to the birth of petrodollars. Nixon himself signed an agreement with Saudi Arabia, whereby that country —the leading oil exporter at the time— would only accept payments in US dollars. In exchange, the United States would guarantee Saudi Arabia's security. The high dependence of the world's economies on oil ensured the permanence of that currency as a reserve and also as the most universal means of international payment.
The Exorbitant Privilege
This shift to a currency based on “trust” ushered in a peculiar financial order: the currency of a single country became the global benchmark. With this, Washington acquired an unparalleled privilege: it can print dollars at will, without the world rejecting them. In fact, the world demands them. Central banks, governments, and companies need dollars to trade, save, and borrow. What for any other nation would be a sure recipe for inflation, for the United States becomes a mechanism for global financing.
The then-finance minister —and later president of France— Valéry Giscard d'Estaing dubbed this situation “exorbitant privilege.” And he was right: thanks to the hegemony of the dollar, the United States can live beyond its means, financing its fiscal and trade deficits with paper—or digital records—that others treasure as if they were gold.
How the Machinery Works
The machinery operates in a simple and brutal manner. As we have seen, oil and most other commodities are traded in dollars. International debt is issued in dollars. Central bank reserves are held in dollars. Thus, every country in the world pays a kind of “tribute” to the center of the system.
When the Federal Reserve expands the money supply —as it did after the 2008 crisis or during the 2020 pandemic— it injects liquidity that travels beyond its borders. Some of those dollars circulate in the global economy, putting pressure on prices and devaluing local currencies. Others return to the United States in the form of purchases of Treasury bonds, considered the safest asset on the planet. In both cases, Washington wins: it finances its debt at low cost and exports part of its inflation.
Not All the Blame Lies with the Dollar
It is worth qualifying this point. Global inflation cannot be explained solely by US issuance. Other factors are at play: wars that disrupt supply chains, oil price hikes, pandemics that disrupt production, financial speculation, and each country's internal policies. But the dollar acts as an amplifier: its status as a global reserve currency means that the costs of US decisions are socialized on a global scale.
When the Federal Reserve raises interest rates, for example, capital flees from emerging countries to Treasury bonds, strengthening the dollar and weakening national currencies. This makes imports more expensive, increases the cost of external debt, and directly hits peripheral economies. It is a reminder that the monetary sovereignty of the Global South is tied to the decisions of a central bank that responds solely to the interests of the United States, with executives from the private financial world and a president appointed by the executive branch.
Invisible Financing
The result is paradoxical: the entire world finances the US deficit. The most indebted country on the planet remains, at the same time, the most solvent in the eyes of the markets. Not because its accounts are in order, but because it can always pay in the currency that only it issues. It is as if everyone else willingly accepted to be eternal creditors of a power that never intends to repay them in gold, but only in its own printed promise.
How Long Will This Last?
The big question is how long this scheme can be sustained. Attempts are already being made to build alternatives: the Chinese yuan or RMB, the BRICS initiatives to trade in local currencies, or even central bank digital currencies. The euro, although important, has not managed to displace the dollar from its throne.
The dollar's hegemony is not just an economic issue: it is a device of power. The United States not only prints the currency that everyone uses; it can also block transactions, apply financial sanctions, and exclude entire countries from the payment system. War and finance are intertwined on the same battlefield.
Meanwhile, the rest of the world bears the costs: imported inflation, more expensive debt, recurring currency crises. The conclusion is uncomfortable but clear: we live in an order in which the issuer of the world currency spends what it does not have, and the rest of the planet pays the bill—increasingly with what it does not have either: growing debt and mortgaged sovereignties.
Perhaps the 21st century will see the emergence of a new monetary equilibrium. But as long as the dollar continues to reign, the paradox will persist: the United States produces deficits, and the whole world finances them.
---
This article was written by Globetrotter. Jaime Bravo is president of Corporación Encuentro Ciudadano. He is an economist with training in government techniques and studies in psychology. He advises public and private institutions in Chile and internationally on situational planning and organizational development. Writer and essayist in the areas of critical thinking, economics, strategy, and analysis of different dimensions of national reality. Jorge Coulon is a musician, writer, and cultural manager. He is a founding member of the group Inti Illimani. He has published “Al vuelo” (1989); “La sonrisa de Víctor Jara” (2009); “Flores de mall” (2011); and recently “En las cuerdas del tiempo. Una historia de Inti Illimani” (2024)

Comments

TRENDING

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar*  Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement. 

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.