Skip to main content

'Millions of jobs at risk': TU leaders, economists slam Modi govt’s response to US tariff shock


By A Representative
 
Marking one month since the United States imposed a steep 50% tariff on nearly half of India’s exports, trade unions, public intellectuals and industry representatives came together at a public discussion organised by the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) and the National Alliance for Justice, Accountability and Rights (NAJAR). The event, held on September 14 under the theme “Trump’s Tariffs and Indian Workers: Impact, Challenges and Way Ahead,” strongly criticised both the US government’s “hostile” action and what participants described as the Indian government’s “shameful inaction” in the face of the crisis.
The tariffs, imposed as ‘punishment’ for India’s continued purchase of Russian oil, have hit sectors employing an estimated 80–85 million workers, including textiles, gems and jewellery, carpets, leather, marine products, chemicals and auto components. Export hubs such as Tiruppur, Ludhiana, Surat, Bhadohi and Agra have seen mass layoffs as firms struggle with cancelled orders, unsold inventories and rising debt. Reports suggest lakhs of workers are being forced to migrate back to their villages and search for lower-paid work.
Professor Arun Kumar, noted economist and retired JNU professor, said the measures had laid bare the vulnerabilities of India’s economic model. “For decades, successive governments have pushed export-oriented growth at the cost of building a strong domestic market. What we are witnessing now is the fragility of that approach. A single hostile action by the US has thrown millions into uncertainty,” he remarked.
Clifton D’Rozario, National Vice-President of the All India Central Council of Trade Unions, accused the Modi government of capitulating to Washington. “This government projected itself as standing tall on the global stage, but when it came to defending Indian workers, it surrendered. The tariffs were a direct attack on India’s sovereignty, and yet the government has only made concessions, from ending duties on cotton imports to agreeing to buy more US goods,” he said.
Geetha Ramakrishnan of the National Federation of Unorganised Sector Workers highlighted the cascading effects on informal labour. “These tariffs are not just about big factories. The entire chain—from home-based workers and dyeing units to micro enterprises—is collapsing. Our workforce has been left exposed because policies have never prioritised security for informal workers,” she noted.
From the industry side, K.E. Raghunathan, Chairman of the Association of Indian Entrepreneurs, expressed alarm at the scale of the disruption. “MSMEs are already on the edge. If the government’s relief measures focus only on protecting larger corporates, the smaller players will be wiped out. What we need is immediate credit support and interest subvention for small firms,” he urged.
Thomas Franco, former General Secretary of the All India Bank Officers Confederation, criticised the government for prioritising corporate interests over worker protection. “The so-called comprehensive package being discussed excludes blue collar workers entirely. Industry leaders talk about ‘rationalising the workforce,’ which is just a euphemism for throwing people out of jobs while lobbying for subsidies,” he said.
Vahidha Nizam, National Secretary of the All India Trade Union Congress, pointed to the wider shifts in US-India relations. “This is not only about tariffs. The H1B visa restrictions and the proposed HIRE Act will hit Indian IT workers hard. Blue collar and white collar workers alike are under attack, while the Indian leadership is busy courting the same forces that are hurting our economy,” she said.
The NAPM, in its statement, condemned the “imperialist onslaught on India’s working classes” and demanded immediate income protection for affected workers and their families, as well as relief for MSMEs. It called for a shift in India’s economic policies away from export-dependence toward strengthening the domestic market and urged the government to realign foreign policy with countries of the global south.
“The benefits of discounted Russian oil never reached the people. Refiners like Reliance reaped windfall profits while workers are now paying with their jobs. This is the true hallmark of Modi’s economic policy—privatised gains and socialised losses,” the statement said.
As participants stressed, the crisis has underscored both India’s economic fragility and the need for worker unity. “Capitalists and the state rely on the fragmentation of workers to push through regressive measures like increased working hours,” NAPM warned, calling on unions across sectors to mobilise and demand fairer policies.
Issued by the National Alliance of People’s Movements, the statement urged immediate protective measures for workers, support for small businesses, and a radical rethinking of India’s development trajectory. “This is a wake-up call,” the organisers said. “India must break from its dependence on imperial powers and chart a people-centred path of self-reliance.”

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

'Policy long overdue': Coalition of 29 experts tells JP Nadda to act on SC warning label order

By A Representative   In a significant development for public health, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to seriously consider implementing mandatory front-of-pack warning labels on pre-packaged food products. The order, passed by a bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and K.V. Viswanathan on February 10, 2026, comes as the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the regulatory body's progress on the issue.

When tourism meets tribal law: The Vanajangi dispute in Andhra Pradesh

By Palla Trinadha Rao   A writ petition presently before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh has brought into focus an increasingly important question in the governance of tribal regions: can eco-tourism projects in Scheduled Areas be implemented without the consent of the Gram Sabha? The case concerns the establishment of a Community Based Eco-Tourism centre at Vanajangi village in Paderu Mandal of Alluri Sitarama Raju District, a region located within the Scheduled Areas of Andhra Pradesh. 

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

Vaccination vs screening: Policy questions raised on cervical cancer strategy

By A Representative   A public policy expert has written to Union Health Minister J. P. Nadda raising a series of concerns regarding the national Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign launched on February 28 for 14-year-old girls.

The new anti-national certificate: If Arundhati Roy is the benchmark, count me in

By Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava*   Dear MANIT Alumni Network Committee, “Are you anti-national?” I encountered this fascinating—some may say intimidating—question from an elderly woman I barely know, an alumna of Maulana Azad College of Technology (MACT, now Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology - MANIT), Bhopal, and apparently one of the founders of the MACT (now MANIT) Alumni Network. The authority with which she posed the question was striking. “How much anti-national are you? What have you done for the Alumni Network Committee to identify you as anti-national?” When I asked what “anti-national” meant to her and who was busy certifying me as such, the response came in counter-questions.

The ultimate all-time ODI XI: A personal selection of icons across eras

By Harsh Thakor* This is my all-time best XI chosen for ODI (One Day International) cricket:  1. Adam Gilchrist (W) – The absolute master blaster who could create the impact of exploding gunpowder with his electrifying strokeplay. No batsman was more intimidating in his era. Often his knocks decided the fate of games as though the result were premeditated. He escalated batting strike rates to surreal realms.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Minority concerns mount: RTI reveals govt funded Delhi religious meet in December

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Indian Muslims have expressed deep concern over what they describe as rising hate speech and hostility against their community under the BJP-led government in India. A recent flashpoint was the event organised by Sanatan Sanstha titled “Sanatan Rashtra Shankhnad Mahotsav” in New Delhi on 13–14 December 2025.