Skip to main content

Ironic? Called development sector, NGOs 'don’t want' a buoyant development media

By Rajiv Shah* 
A couple of days after I did a story in Counterview titled "Why Gujarat Dalits want huge brass coin placed in new Parliament building base" (April 17, 2022) the person who had conceptualised the unique 1000-kg brass coin idea, Martin Macwan, a well-known human rights leader, phoned me up to find out why dominant newspapers had “ignored” the event.
Indeed, none of the two major papers which come out of Gujarat, “The Times of India” and the “Indian Express” wrote a word about it. The big brass coin has been prepared with the help of three Dalit artists – one from Odisha and two from Delhi – who have been involved gold plating the Somnath temple.
Lord Buddha on one side, and Baba Ambedkar on the other, along with the big coin, a large number of small one foot coins have also been minted – all from about 2,700 kg brass utensils donated largely by Dalits in Gujarat’s around 750 villages, as also a dozen other states across India. Embossed is the writeup on each of them: Will India end untouchabily by 2047?
The coin is proposed to be taken to Delhi in August first week, and is proposed be handed over to the Prisident of India to be placed in Parliament building -- the earlier demand to place it the foundation (part of Indian religious tradition cited by Macwan by quoting a myth regarding removal of untouchability) has been dropped.
Be that as it may, I found it a little hard to give an explanation. But this is what I told him: The media houses that received the invitation for the event for the release of the brass coins at the Dalit Shakti Kendra (DSK), about 20 km from Ahmedabad, perhaps didn’t understand why so much effort was being made to collect brass and then come up with the huge coin, when the new Parliament building as part of the Re 20,000 crore Central Vista itself was in question.
What I didn’t tell Macwan, though I said to this to another top Gujarat-based voluntary sector leader, was this: Top newspapers not taking a story suggests their priorities are very different. To them, business, finance, crime, lifestyle and politics in corridors of power are more important. Even if they happen to take stories related to Dalits, which they usually do when a major event, such as atrocities, take place, these are usually buried inside columns.
So, I asked this second person: Why do you have to be so dependent on the corporate media today, when alternatives are beginning to exist? Why not instead depend on and encourage alternative media in every possible way so that stories on untouchability, Dalits, Adivasis, human rights and so on are highlighted and propagated?
Indeed, my direct involvement with NGOs over the last about a decade after I retired from the Times of India as political editor suggests, they have been complaining as to why their stories and views are not covered in what they consider as dominant media. What I have found is this: While some of the NGOs do think it may “necessary” to have their “own media”, there is little, or no, concerted effort to have development journalism.
Indeed, NGOs, while insisting they are the development sector, clearly do not want development media to reflect their news and views. In fact, most of the time I have found their volunteers approaching me not for getting their articles published in Counterview, for instance, which is readily available, or for that matter any other development media. 
A top NGO leader wrote a column in a corporate-owned paper, now closed down, for quite a while, after getting it meticulously edited, but, I know for sure, didn't even respond to requests to write a column in a blogging site supported by an NGO. 
More recently, a top activist based in Bhuj, Kutch, doing exceptionally good work, approached me to get a series of articles published in the Times of India on environmental degradation of the unique Banni grassland. He even forwarded an initial article, which he told me was published in a Gujarati local Kutch daily. 
I forwarded the article to the Times of India, but I know, they don't entertain outsiders' articles. A reporter from the daily even got in touch with this activist. Finding that nothing has happened, he told me that he would hand over the series for Counterview "very soon." A fortnight passed, after repeated query on what has happened, this activist replied, "We are not publishing the articles now as we are in negotiations with the government."
Indeed, embarassing officialdom remains a major reason (or should I say hurdle?) why NGOs do not support development media. To them, advocacy means convincing officialdom why their development work is very crucial; alternative media doesn't seem to exist in their advocacy drive.
And if they at all seek media "support", most of them just seek "contacts" in the Times of India or the Indian Express, two top corporate media with presence in Ahmedabad, for publication of their articles. They appear to be little concerned about getting things published in what have been known as development media.
Worse, hiding behind the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), which the present government is using to attack NGOs, what these NGOs don’t understand is this: Huge possibilities today exist, unlike in the past, to give a helping hand to what is called development journalism. They hate FCRA but to them it's a necessary evil without which they would have to close shop. 
Mohammed Yunus predicted, ICT would make the world free of power brokers and knowledge brokers
Let me recall here what I learned way back in 2007 from a book presented to me by a senior Gujarat bureaucrat, titled “Bankers to the Poor”, first published in 1998, and republished by the Penguins in 2007.
Authored by Nobel laureate Mohammad Yunus, the Grameen Bank man from Bangladesh, a doyen of development sector, in 1998, when information and communication technology (ICT) was still nowhere to be seen, the book said, ICT was going to “change the world in the immediate future far more rapidly and fundamentally than any other technology so far in human history.”
 The following words in the article “Poverty Free World: How and When” are prophetic: “The most attractive aspect of this spread of ICT is that it is not in anyone’s control. Neither government, nor big business, nor anyone of any authority can restrict the flow of information. The next best aspect of it is that it is becoming cheaper every day.”
Yunus continued, “ICT is raising the hope that we are approaching the world which is free from power brokers, and knowledge brokers”. He predicted, this ICT revolution was “particularly exciting for all disadvantaged groups, voiceless groups, and minority groups.” He insisted, “Any power based on exclusive access to information will disintegrate. Any common citizen will have almost as much access to information as the head of government. Leadership will have to be based on vision and integrity, rather than on manipulation of information”.
It may not be fashionable to quote Karl Marx, as was in 1970s. But what Yunus said is only a reflection of Marx’s views enunciated way back in 1859 in “Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy”: “No social order is ever destroyed before all the productive forces for which it is sufficient have been developed, and new superior relations of production never replace older ones before the material conditions for their existence have matured within the framework of the old society.”
Despite the fact that Yunus is essentially an NGO – or development – man, NGOs have, unfortunately, never paid heed to what he said. I doubt if anyone has even read Yunus.
Complaints apart, what is not understood is, human rights is, apparently, isn’t quite respected in most corporate-run media houses, though they occasionally do cover human rights, or take articles by human rights leaders, but only when major events take shape.
Even the semi-Left media, in which I worked ("Patriot" and "Link") between 1979 and 1993, before I joined the “Times of India” rarely took up untouchability issues, for instance. Of course, when atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis were committed, all covered them, but only as news -- or as parachute journalism, to quote a professor of journalism. Communal riots were of course covered more prominently.
After I joined the “Times of India”, Ahmedabad, as assistant editor, I not only met BJP and Congress politicians but also began interacting with some prominent experts in the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad, Gandhi Labour Institute, Sardar Patel Institute of Social and Economic Research, Centre for Environment and Planning, and so on. In the course of my interactions, I also came across activists who are considered part of the development sector – Prafull Trivedi, Achyut Yagnik, Martin Macwan, Gagan Sethi, Indubhai Jani, Madhusudan Mistry and Sukhdev Patel.
Leaving politics to my colleagues, I began doing stories based on what these experts and NGO activists would tell me – such as mining around Gir forests and its impact on environment, impact of collapse of textile mills on Gujarat workers, Gujarat’s poverty, Narmada dam and its impact on the the tribals, children’s plight etc. The Gir story, given to me by a senior activist, created a ripple -- the matter went to the Gujarat High Court!
Be that as it may, I recall doing my first story on untouchability in 1996, covering a strike by manual scavengers in Ranpur, the home town of prominent Gandhian poet Jhaverchand Meghani, against the despicable practice which Gandhiji called “shame of the nation.” My bosses took what I had written more as a news story than an untouchability issue.
Handed over by Martin Macwan, and carried on Page 1 a lead, I didn’t realise the importance it carried. Based on this story, a public interest litigation was filed in the Gujarat High Court, and manual scavenging caught national attention, as it soon reached the Supreme Court. I was awarded a human rights award for journalism two years later by the NGOs run by Martin Macwan and Gagan Sethi.
Ironically, none of my colleagues in the "Times of India", including the then editor, Kamalendra Kanwar, thought it necessary to attend the function. They made fun of me. A colleague sarcastically asked me: What human rights job have I done that I got this award?
Be that as it may, after I was shifted to Gandhinagar to cover the Gujarat government, untouchability got pushed to the backburner, though I kept in touch with Martin Macwan, finding out what all he was doing, continuing to do some stories on issues that he told me – like atrocities on Dalits – after talking about it with government officials. Travelling across Gujarat on holidays, I would invariably do ground stories related to environment, school education, tribal rights, and so on, but back to my duty, my job was to cover the government.
The only major story that I did on untouchability, let me recall, was in 2007 – a report on a book carrying Narendra Modi’s speeches in front of top government officials at Chintan Shibirs, or Study Camps especially for them. In this book, “Karmayog”, Modi states that those cleaning up gutters or involved in cremation duty experience spirituality. 
The story, carried in an inside page, wasn’t noticed immediately, but after several months, top Congress politicians sought the book from me – which I no longer had – to raise the issue in Parliament. While I am unable to find online version of the story,  details of the story can be found here.
Not that the “Times of India” didn’t carry stories on untouchability – we had a socially conscious editor in Bharat Desai. After all, individuals do make a difference. The previous editor, Kingshuk Nag, ensured that no stone was unturned in covering the 2002 Gujarat riots.  Desai got done a series of stories on untouchability in Gujarat, based on a 2009 survey, carried out by Martin Macwan’s NGO Navsarjan Trust with the help of US experts, who came down to Gujarat to help with the methodology. 
The stories created ripples in the corridors of power. A parallel government survey was ordered to counter the claim of Navsarjan that in 90% of Gujarat villages untouchability existed – though its contents were not made public for long.
Before I retired in January 2013, I went around several sympathetic experts, including two well known academics, and activists seeking their support to have an online alternative media that would reflect what they say or do -- as they are full with facts and figures of ground level realities. I had already prepared a prototype of what I was planning. Most of them seemed not interested, a few just didn't listen to me. 
One of them, who used to be very friendly till they found I was to retire from the Times of India, began showing complete disinterest in me -- even though this person was the first one to whom I showcased, way back in 2012, a year before I retired, what I was considering.
Martin Macwan and Gagan Sethi were, of course, exceptions. They asked me why didn’t I join them – which is what I did in May 2013 as a consultant. I started a blogging platform for the NGOs, counterview.org. 
Before I joined, I was told, I couldn’t be “newsy” with the online platform, which I had proposed to start, as NGOs are “not allowed” to carry news stories, as it violates their terms and conditions, especially FCRA. Hence, I decided to start a separate news blog, Counterview. In contact with the NGOs run by these two activist-leaders, I realised the significance of untouchability.
In Counterview, which I handle without any support from any quarter, except in the form of articles and information of ground events, over the last nine years, we have done an umpteen number of stories on atrocities on Dalits, casteism and untouchability. 
Existence of manual scavenging in Gujarat, as elsewhere, has been one of my favourite subjects. We have also carried articles on and by several prominent activists and experts,  human rights defenders and socially-conscious journalists, apart from stories based on communiques by Dalit groups and human rights organisations based in in India and abroad.
I have always wondered whether these stories would be considered part of what is now called development journalism. What one of my academic-journalist friends, who has been teaching media in Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, Prof Pradeep Mallik, said surprised me. 
Forwarding me a "Guardian" article, "What is Development Journalism", he told me, he would give my example to his students whom he taught what development journalism was like. “A lot of your stories were related with development journalism when you were in the Times of India, and you continue to follow the same even today”, Mallik, who studies media trends in depth, opined.
I belong to the generation which has never had any formal training in journalism. So, to people of our generation of journalists, development journalism remained an alien phrase for long. 
One of my former colleagues in the "Times of India", currently in Mumbai, Gajanan Khergamker, said, we used to talk about “human interest stories” – which is what they call development stories today. One of the seniormost Indian journalists, Anand Sahay, qualified anything related with policy issues and social change as development journalism. 
I asked one of India’s topmost human rights leaders, Medha Patkar, what was development journalism. She took me back to the days before the Narmada dam was being built. In her representation before the World Bank commission, which had come to assess the possible impact of the dam, she said, the proposed dam was anti-development, as it would destroy the life and livelihood of the tribal people.
According to her, any effort to report on how the underprivileged people are affected by projects was development journalism. She said, today, alternative media – and she named thewire.in, scroll.in and newsclick.in as examples – had taken up development journalism. 
There are development journalists with established dailies, too, she asserted, giving the example of a Mumbai scribe who always reported whatever struggles were being waged by the Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao movement, but "they are very few", she insisted.
There is a section of activists which considers constructive work carried out by NGOs – building checkdams, constructing ponds, helping out organic farming, “empowering” women through economic efforts like micro finance, and so on – alone as development journalism. However, to Medha Patkar and others, this is just one part of development journalism. The other, related to human rights issues, is even more important, as it shows what’s lacking in human development.
The examples of NGOs’ “constructive activity” as development journalism can be seen in two online journals – India Development Review (IDR) and Civil Society Online (CSO). They are quite unlike The Wire and Scroll, for instance, which carry not just political stories but also the impact political policies of the government on the underprivileged.
Both IDR and CSO have NGO heavy weights and elite journalists on board. I know for sure, even when they commission articles from NGO people, they edit out those portions which may be uncomfortable with the establishment – I have been involved in preparing draft of such articles for top activists myself.
---
*This blog is based on Rajiv Shah's online lecture at the Association for India's Development (AID)-Boston, USA

Comments

OEHNI said…
Very good article. Thank you, Rajiv for sharing your experiences and explaining what development journalism is, the priorities of major newspapers, the priorities and dilemmas of the NGOs and so on. A lot to learn from this. I agree with you that still NGOs lack confidence and trust in the alternate media. Together they can make an impact if they choose to.
Pankti Jog said…
This article is very straight foreward and narrates how organizations perceive online alternative media. Very thought provoking. when i talk to activists and ask them why dont they write on platforms like counter view? Basically either writing skill, language barrier or time is the reason given.. but there may be one calculation that how much is the reach of alternative media? so mainstream media attraction is always remain becoz of of it's reached.. Though most of the time.. edited news item does not carry same message as original press note. Also every one writes in fb, insta, twitter. However alternative media is powerful Media , it's like saathi of your cause. We need to seriosul
y discuss / think on this.
Good article--ideas are clearly stated without frills like stastics which only confuse the issues.

If anyone says gutter cleaning is uplifting I would ask if he or she has cleaned any and how uplifting the experience was.

You have worked hard and been long in this game--which makes your article sound sincere.

Roshan Shah said…
Brilliant Rajivbhai.

We need alternate media that tells absolute truth and has space for critical views as the truth may not necessarily be right for society. And that will open up debates and reforms but truth is the starting point

The leading mainstream media has somehow missed the crux of journalism both print and TV and it is not just India.

In India it is worse because of political and corporate interference in what can get published, how and when and it could be twisted truth, not true or manufactured and fabricated story around truth.

Regardless you have been peristtently giving platform and voices to activists.

There are people like me who make mistakes and would want to know where I made mistake so I can correct and improve and there are Indian politicians who make intentional mistakes, encourage corrupt practices and then pressurize media not to report this
Democracy itself worldwide is going through churn with new tools of globally connected masses, constant surveillance and absolute government control on every movement.

Tech is has its good and bad depends on whose hand it falls under.

When automation takes away more jobs it will be interesting how universal basic income will emerge and new election models, crypto currencies will bring new governance models which will give sigh of relief to honest journalism

Days are not far away

TRENDING

Economist-editor's allegations on Narmada defamatory, baseless: Medha Patkar

Counterview Desk  In a reply directly addressed to well-known economist, journalist and columnist Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar’s two articles in the Times of India (republished here and here ), calling them defamatory and wondering whether they were borne out of “ignorance or a conspiracy through political alliance”, Narmada Bachao Andolan leader Medha Pakar has said that the Narmada Sardar Saravar Project and the people's movement by adivasis, farmers, labourers, fish workers, potters and all the generations’ old communities from the river valley have suddenly come to be focused on, since the Gujarat elections are in the doorstep. She believes that while the “defamatory accusations with baseless conceptions such as ‘urban naxals’ are to be laughed at as the electoral strategic moves, one gets shocked to read the articles by a known old columnist like Swaminathan Ankalesaria Aiyar, published in a reputed daily like the Times of India." According to her, Aiyar’s two articl

Hindutva groups threat to peace, freedom: US diaspora groups tell FBI, other govt depts

By Our Representative  The Islamophobic and neo-Nazi ideology of Hindutva is a clear and present danger to peace and freedoms in the United States, a coalition of civil rights organizations told key officials of the U.S. Attorney General’s Office, the US Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) at a recent event in Edison, New Jersey. At the event titled United Against Hate, activists from American Muslims for Democracy (AMD), Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR) and Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) made detailed presentations on this ideology of Hindu supremacism that is committing mass persecution of India’s Muslims and Christians and is rearing its ugly head in New Jersey as well as across the US. Attending the event were David S Leonardis, Special Investigator from the New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety; Michael E Campion, Chief of the Civil Rights Division for the US Attorney General's Office; and Jonathan R Norbut of the U.S. Dep

Facing tough times, Rajasthan's Raika herders hold first-ever camel cheese festival

By Rosamma Thomas*  During the pandemic, the annual Pushkar camel fair in Rajasthan did not occur for fear of contagion; in 2022, it was called off again as lumpy skin disease affected cattle. At Sadri in Pali district, however, festivity continues – a two-day Camel Cheese Festival was held on November 23 and 24, 2022. Visitors spent time with the camel herds and their Raika, drank camel-milk tea with the herders and then returned to lunch at the Kumbhalgarh Camel Dairy, from where the Kumbhalgarh Fort is visible, to taste camel cheese. The Raika herders have been facing a tough time – camels are no longer used as much for transport or agriculture in Rajasthan. The animals have limited utility, but their milk is prized. Camel Charisma, the dairy at Kumbhalgarh, sends camel milk across the country to people who use it in therapy – for autistic children, improved blood sugar levels, or even to treat cancer. It is believed that the health benefits of the camel milk is because the animals

As polls approach, electorate 'failing to realise': Gujarat model is in a shambles

By DN Rath*  Gujarat assembly elections, scheduled to be held on 1 and 5 December 2022, is viewed by many as dress rehearsal for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. When the suffering people have been pointing towards redressal of some local issues like absence of cleanliness, sewage problem, shortage of water supply, troubles created by stray cattle, insufficiency of streetlights, etc., it is evident that they are not fully aware that assembly elections are being fought on ideological standpoints and policy decisions. Nor is there the realisation that the state is in a shambles and the much-trumpeted ‘Gujarat model’ of development has proved to be a hoax. Like other states, the people of Gujarat are also back-broken by steep rise in prices to the tune of 400% in last 20 years. It is not that the government cannot control the spurt in prices if it so wants. Apart from the fact that price rise is an inevitability in a capitalist economy, artificial shortage triggered by massive hoarding, b

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Shedding Hindu-Hindi-Hindustan? New Modi-Shah love for Tamil Nadu 'ignores' Periyar

By Sandeep Pandey*   The Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) or the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) have long argued for ‘Hindu-Hindi-Hindustan’, which into recent years has translated into a crisper English expression: ‘One Nation-One Religion-One Language’. Given this backdrop, it is curious that the BJP government has organised the Kashi Tamil Sangamam in Varanasi, the Prime Minister’s constituency. Why did the BJP and RSS feel the need for such an event? All Narendra Modi events are highly publicised and have multiple political objectives. It is never an innocuous religious/cultural event as it may appear from the face of it. Afterall, RSS calls itself a cultural organisation, but has never ceased to surprise us with its political designs. Tamil Nadu has a long history of opposing imposition of Hindi by Union governments. Periyar EV Ramasamy had opposed the idea of compulsory teaching in Hindi as far back as in 1937. The 1960s witnessed violent protests against Hindi in which a number

GM mustard not swadeshi, it's a patent of MNC Bayer, GoI 'misleading' SC: Modi told

Counterview Desk  In a representation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as many as 42 farmers’ organisations though their representatives , backed by senior scientists and experts, have said that the Government of India (GoI) should stop misleading the Supreme Court “with untrue and incorrect” statements on GM mustard. Insisting that India does not need unsafe GM mustard, in their representation, they urged the Supreme Court to order immediate uprooting of GM mustard crop in various locations. The representation comes even as a penal of experts, coming down heavily on the GoI for refusing to see how in less than a week’s time the pollen from GM mustard will “start contaminating” non-GM mustard fields with transgenes, including male sterility and herbicide tolerant traits. Alleging that the GoI is actively misleading the Supreme Court with untrue and incorrect statements on GM mustard, Kavitha Kuruganti of the Coalition for a GM-Free India said, “We can list at least five areas where Gov

Demand to withdraw 'anti-environment, anti-adivasi' forest conservation rules 2022

By Gopinath Majhi*  The Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), Odisha, a coalition of adivasis and forest dwellers’ organisations, has sent a memorandum to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) raising serious concerns over Forest (Conservation) Rules, 2022, notified by the Centre on June 29.  Contending that recent amendments and a host of executive orders/guidelines issued by the ministry undermine and dilute the FRA and threaten the rights of adivasis and forest dwellers, CSD demands that the 2022 FC Rules should be rescinded forthwith. Demanding withdrawal of such anti-people and anti-environment rules CSD Odisha organised a protest Dharana in front of State Assembly today on 25th November 2022 and submitted memorandums to the Hon’ble Governor of Odisha, Chief Secretary and Commissioner-cum-Secretary, ST & SC Development Department for conveying our concerns against the FC Rules 2022 to the Central Government for its withdrawal. The memorandums w

BJP poll gimmick? Bilkis Bano rape case 'pardon' vs Rajiv assassins' release

By Sandeep Pandey*  Supreme Court has released six convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. This was bound to happen as earlier AG Perarivalan was released in the same case, setting a precedent. Even though four of them are Sri Lankans but a popular Tamil sentiment favoured the release of these convicts which is why Tamil political parties supported this and resolutions were passed by different governments in Tamil Nadu to his effect.  Rajiv Gandhi paid the price of sending Indian Peace Keeping Force to Sri Lanka where it got entangled with Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and eventually the whole operation ended up is a fiasco.  However, most importantly Sonia and Priyanka Gandhi and probably Rahul too do not have any objections to the release of these convicts. In fact, Sonia Gandhi played an important role in getting the death sentence of the only lady among the convicts Nalini commuted to life term through the Tamil Nadu Governor. Priyanka visited Nalini in Vellore Jail and

Never-ending saga of sin tax: What if murder is taxed at Rs 1 crore, rape at Rs 5 crore?

By Moses Raj GS, Sangeetha Thomas*  What should have ended by June 30, 2022 as a 5 year experiment has resurfaced. The government has extended the levy of GST compensation cess by another 4 years till March 31, 2026. This cess, dubbed as the sin tax imposed on sin(ful) goods, is double the highest slab on indirect taxes. But only a few pay for it and the majority benefit, unendingly. The year 2017 is a landmark year for indirect taxes. With the grand idea of ‘One Nation, One Tax’ as a fiscal slogan subsuming all State based taxes such as octroi /entry tax, Value Added Tax (VAT), sales tax, taxes on lottery, betting and gambling, luxury tax, purchase tax, entertainment tax, property tax, professional tax and central sales tax into a single framework of Goods and Services Tax (GST) changed the contours of revenue collection. Complicating it further, India, with each State having its own size and revenue problems, has the most complex and highly centralised indirect tax structure in the w