Skip to main content

'Drop all falsed charges': 150 citizens demand early release of AltNews co-founder

Counterview Desk 

About 150 concerned citizens have demanded the release of Mohammed Zubair, co-founder of the fact-checkng newsportal AltNews, arrested over a 2018 tweet which allegedly hurt religious sentiments, even as booking for criminal conspiracy and having received foreign funds in violation of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA).
Denied bail last weekend and sent to 14-day judicial custody, the concerned citizens, in a statement, regretted that while the Delhi High Court issued notice to the Delhi police on a petition filed on behalf of Zubair challenging the legality and propriety of his police remand and the seizure of his electronic devices, the “frivolous case” continues.


The illegal arrest of Mr. Mohammed Zubair happened on June 27, 2022, by the Delhi Police for allegedly hurting religious sentiments and promoting enmity over a tweet from 2018. The IPC Sections included 153(a) (Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence) and 295(a) (deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs).
As a part of AltNews which runs a factchecking website it was the job of Mr. Mohammad Zubair to verify news from across the political spectrum on social media. We believe that Mr. Zubair is being targeted maliciously for performing the role which a media person is expected to perform, namely scrupulous fact checking as well as exposing fake news and political disinformation. Mr. Zubair’s courageous, conscientious and exemplary work as a journalist upheld the highest standards of the media and his work burnished India’s global image as a democracy in which truth could be told to power.
According to the Delhi Police, the reason for his arrest is a 2018 tweet wherein Mr Zubair posted a screenshot of a 1983 film by Hrishikesh Mukherjee. However, Mr. Pratik Sinha, the co-founder of AltNews, tweeted that Mr. Zubair was called for questioning by the Delhi police in another case for which he already had protection from the court; but arrested without any notice.
The 1983 tweet is simply a pretext of seizing Mr. Zubair’s phone and laptop as investigation of the offence is barred by limitation. The seizure of the electronic devices is illegal as they are irrelevant to the FIR. Apart from violating his fundamental right to privacy his journalistic integrity and confidentiality of information and sources, we apprehend that the police may tamper with the seized material and build a false conspiracy to implicate him and other members of civil society as was done with some of the Bhima Koregaon accused by planting material on their laptops.
It is also suspicious that the account from which the complaint came was an anonymous Twitter handle @balajikijaiin by the name of Hanuman Bhakt. The account came into being on October 2021, had only one follower, and this complaint was his first tweet Although in court during Zubair’s remand, the police had submitted that the person running the Twitter account was “not anonymous”.
However, according to news reports the Delhi police sent a notice under Section 91 of CrPC to Twitter, India, in which the investigation officer informed the website about the case and they’ve asked them to provide IP log details of the anonymous Twitter handle @balajikijaiin, registration details of the account, mobile number, connected email ID, and device used by the user. This exposes the malafide of the police which is now trying to trace the complainant after using his tweet as material for an FIR against Zubair.
By failing to exercising his judicial role, the Judicial Magistrate ends up empowering the arbitrary state to flout constitutional safeguards
Apart from the above illegalities, after Zubair’s arrest his lawyers were not given a copy of the FIR despite repeated requests. They were given a copy only after the police remand order late into the night of the 27th of June. Zubair was taken around with policemen without name tags; these are all violations of the DK Basu guidelines of Arrest and Detention issued by the Supreme Court of India.
We are also perplexed that remand was granted to the police for such a frivolous case. Under the Constitutional scheme, the Magistrate is not expected to function as a glorified post office, blindly accepting the remand report and ordering remand. The Judicial Magistrate should have ensured that the mandate of Sec 41A CrPC is followed as well as the guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar to ensure that police officers do not arrest accused unnecessarily and Magistrate do not authorise detention casually and mechanically. By failing to exercising his judicial role, the Judicial Magistrate ends up empowering the arbitrary state to flout constitutional safeguards with impunity.
We demand that Delhi Police immediately release Mr. Zubair and drop all false charges against him. We also demand that the Delhi Police Commissioner take stern action against errant officials who violated the DK Basu guidelines during the arrest of Mr. Zubair. Given the illegal manner of Mr. Zubair’s arrest we are also deeply concerned about Mr. Zubair’s safety and prospect of torture in police custody.
It is ironical that on the same day as Mr. Zubair’s arrest, India along with G7 countries, signed the ‘2022 Resilient Democracies Statement’, wherein the Indian government committed to “guarding the freedom, independence and diversity of civil society actors” and “protecting the freedom of expression and opinion online and offline”.
We hope that the Government of India will respect its obligations under the Indian Constitution as well as international laws which India has agreed to be bound by. India in accordance with its self-assumed obligations should also stand by the Declaration on Human Rights Defenders adopted in 1998 by the UN general Assembly, ensuring the safety of all those who are critical of the government including HRDs in India, and protect the freedom of expression and opinion of all.
Click here for signatories



'Very low rung in quality ladder': Critique of ICMR study on 'sudden deaths' post-2021

By Bhaskaran Raman*  Since about mid-2021, a new phenomenon of extreme concern has been observed throughout the world, including India : unexplained sudden deaths of seemingly healthy and active people, especially youngsters. In the recently concluded Navratri garba celebrations, an unprecedented number of young persons succumbed to heart attack deaths. After a long delay, ICMR (Indian Council for Medical Research) has finally has published a case-control study on sudden deaths among Indians of age 18-45.

SC 'appears to foster' culture of secrecy, does not seek electoral bond details from SBI

By Rosamma Thomas*  In its order of November 2, 2023 on the case of Association for Democratic Reforms vs Union of India contesting constitutional validity of electoral bonds, the Supreme Court directed all political parties to give particulars of the bonds received by them in sealed covers to the Election Commission of India. SC sought that information be updated until September 2023. 

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Only 12% of schools RTE compliant: Whither 6% budgetary allocation for education?

By Ambarish Rai* Despite Indian state’s commitment of 6% GDP on education, the Finance Minister completely ignored right to education for children and strengthening implementation of RTE Act which makes education a fundamental right in her budget speech . The Right to Education (RTE) Forum, which is a collective of different stakeholders in education, condemns this neglect of a legal entitlement, which is unconstitutional and demand for overall increase in the budget to ensure improvement in learning outcomes and overall enhancement of quality education.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Reject WHO's 'draconian' amendments on pandemic: Citizens to Union Health Minister

By Our Representative  Several concerned Indian citizens have written to the Union Health Minister to reject amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) of the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted during the 75th World Health Assembly (WHA75) in May 2022, apprehending this will make the signatories surrender their autonomy to the “unelected, unaccountable and the whimsical WHO in case of any future ‘pandemics’.”

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Union Health Ministry, FSSAI 'fail to respond' to NHRC directive on packaged food

By Our Representative  The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has expressed deep concern over the adverse health effects caused by packaged foods high in salt, sugar, and saturated fats. Recognizing it as a violation of the Right to Life and Right to Health of Indian citizens, the quasi-judicial body called for a response from the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) regarding its selection of front-of-pack labels aimed at providing consumers with information to make healthier choices.

British companies export 'deadly' asbestos to India, other countries from offshore offices

Inside a UK asbestos factory in 1994 before the mineral was banned By Rajiv Shah “The Sunday Times”, which forms part of the powerful British daily, “The Times”, has raised the alarm that though the “deadly” asbestos is banned in Britain, companies registered in United Kingdom, and operating from other countries, “are involved in shipping it to developing nations”, especially India. India, Brazil, Russia and China account for almost 80% of the asbestos consumed globally every year, it adds.