Skip to main content

Supreme Court: Outsourcing jobs in public institutions cannot be used as a tool for exploitation

By Raj Kumar Sinha* 
Ahead of the Assembly elections in Bihar, the issue of contract workers has heated up. A few days ago in Patna, around 9,000 land survey contract workers arrived at the BJP office demanding their jobs be made permanent and for the payment of outstanding salaries. These contract workers, who are involved in land measurement, were then subjected to a police baton charge. The protest had been going on for a month at the Gardanibagh strike site in Patna, Bihar.
According to the contract workers, they have been working in various government offices, including the Revenue and Land Reforms Department, for years but do not receive the same rights and benefits as permanent employees. Their main demands are "equal pay for equal work" and guaranteed service until the age of 60.
The biggest challenge for contract workers is job insecurity. Their contracts are renewed periodically, which creates a constant fear of losing their jobs. Most contract workers do not receive a pension, gratuity, medical facilities, or other social security benefits, leaving their future uncertain.
Due to a lack of permanent positions in government departments, contract workers are often given extra work without a corresponding increase in salary or incentives. There is no clear promotion system for contract appointments. In many cases, employees remain in the same position even after 10-15 years of service. This uncertainty, low pay, and inequality lead to dissatisfaction, stress, and a feeling of insecurity among contract workers.
India's employment crisis is not new, but workers hired through contracts and outsourcing remain the most neglected class today. These employees do the same work and bear the same responsibilities as government employees, yet they are largely ignored when it comes to rights and benefits. Despite their continuous hard work, honesty, and loyalty, they never get stability or social and economic security. This is why contract and outsourced workers, who form the very foundation of the government's work, are the most distressed.
Recently, in response to an appeal filed by daily-wage workers of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta stated that public institutions cannot use the outsourcing of jobs as a means of exploitation. They also cannot deny long-term ad-hoc employees regularization or pay parity by citing financial strain or a lack of vacancies. The court affirmed that constitutional principles such as equality (Article 14), equal opportunity in appointment processes (Article 16), and the right to a dignified life (Article 21) must be followed.
The Court said, "Outsourcing cannot become a convenient shield through which instability is maintained and fair appointment processes are avoided where the work is permanent."
Justice Nath commented that the "State (central and state governments) is not merely a market participant but a constitutional employer. It cannot balance its budget on the labor of those who perform the most basic and consistent public work. Where the work is continuous, day in and day out, year after year, the institution's sanctioned capacity and appointment processes must reflect that reality."
The court emphasized that "as a constitutional employer, the State must live up to higher standards and organize its permanent workforce on a sanctioned structure, budget for legitimate appointments, and implement judicial directives with complete sincerity. Delay in fulfilling these obligations is not mere negligence, but a deliberate pattern of denial that destroys the livelihood and dignity of these employees."
Justice Nath wrote that the long-term extraction of regular labor under a temporary label has undermined faith in public administration and hurt the promise of equal protection.
This decision was based on an appeal filed by daily-wage workers of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Education Services Commission, represented by advocate Sriram Parakkat. After the commission rejected their plea for regularization, citing financial hardship and a lack of vacancies, they approached the Supreme Court. The court accepted the appeal, stating, "Financial austerity certainly has a place in public policy, but it is not a talisman that can bypass the duty to organize work fairly, reasonably, and on a legal basis."
In Madhya Pradesh, millions of temporary outsourced employees work in various departments with no job security or fair wages. They work like daily laborers. Computer operators are given highly skilled work but are paid the wages of an unskilled laborer. Contract workers are forced to work 9 to 16 hours without a weekly off or a reliever.
Madhya Pradesh has more than 9 lakh contract and outsourced employees. About 2.75 lakh outsourced employees have been struggling for their outstanding arrears for 11 months. The amount of approximately ₹350 crore is stuck, and despite a clear order from the labor court in November 2024, departmental officials and contractors are procrastinating.
Employees complain that in many districts, old contractors' contracts have ended, and new contractors are refusing to take responsibility for paying the old arrears. The earnings of outsourced employees support not only them but also their families' futures. Before the 2023 Assembly elections, the current government promised a salary increase and contractual benefits for outsourced employees in its manifesto.
Madhya Pradesh MLA Hiralal Alawa said that temporary and outsourced employees are being treated unjustly in the state, as they are not paid their full wages. This shows the government's intention to make them slaves. The Madhya Pradesh Labor Department has ordered all department heads to make it mandatory for outsourced agencies to register and obtain a license so that action can be taken if labor laws are violated. Outsourced and contract workers employed in various government and semi-government departments will have to be provided benefits under labor laws. For this, agencies will have to register with the labor department, obtain a license, and provide the prescribed wages and facilities.
In different parts of the country, schemes like the National Health Mission (NHM), Jeevika, MGNREGA, and many state-level programs are running, whose foundation rests on these contract and outsourced employees. But the irony is that the voices of the employees who make these schemes successful on the ground are neither heard in the corridors of power nor in administrative offices. The biggest problem for contract and outsourced employees is that no regulatory commission has been formed for them, nor has any clear policy been set. This is an issue of social and administrative reform that affects the quality of services as well as the employees themselves.
Today, it is imperative that the problems of contract workers are not seen merely from the perspective of "temporary employment" but that a permanent solution is found by considering them the backbone of the system. This is because justice is not only their right but also the moral responsibility of the system.
---
*Bargi Dam Displaced and Affected Union

Comments

Dunu Roy said…
The Supreme Court should have taken suo moto cognisance of this in 1970 when the Contract Labour Act was passed. And again in 1990 when the GoI agreed to Structural Reforms imposed by the IMF and issued a GO directing all public sector institutions to stop all new recruitment. It didn't. What then is served by this judgement now?

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

The Epstein shock, global power games and India’s foreign policy dilemma

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The “Epstein” tsunami has jolted establishments everywhere. Politicians, bureaucrats, billionaires, celebrities, intellectuals, academics, religious gurus, and preachers—all appear to be under scrutiny, even dismantled. At first glance, it may seem like a story cutting across left, right, centre, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, capitalists—every label one can think of. Much of it, of course, is gossip, as people seek solace in the possible inclusion of names they personally dislike. 

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram   In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay.