Skip to main content

Civil society groups unite to oppose Rajasthan anti-conversion Bill, urge Governor to withhold assent

By A Representative 
A coalition of civil society organisations, rights groups and faith-based associations has strongly condemned the passage of the “Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion Bill, 2025” in the State Assembly on September 9, calling it draconian, unconstitutional and a direct attack on the fundamental rights of minorities. The statement was released at a press conference held at Vinoba Gyan Mandir, Jaipur, where representatives of more than a dozen organisations declared that they would actively lobby against the bill and urged the Governor not to grant assent, but instead refer it to the President of India under Article 200 of the Constitution.
The organisations argued that the Rajasthan bill is harsher and more invasive than existing anti-conversion laws in eleven states and violates Articles 14, 19, 21 and 25 of the Constitution. They noted that similar attempts in Rajasthan in 2006 and 2008 were blocked when the Governors of the time withheld assent and forwarded the bills to the President. The joint statement alleged that the law, far from protecting public order, will be used as a political tool by the ruling BJP to spread fear and hostility against minorities and to impose the ideological agenda of the Sangh Parivar.
Citing provisions that criminalise even ordinary discussions of faith as “allurement” and impose severe penalties ranging from seven years to life imprisonment with fines up to ₹30 lakh, the groups warned that the bill violates constitutional guarantees of freedom of conscience and the right to privacy. They pointed to Section 5, which introduces the concept of “love jihad” into the statute, as particularly dangerous, and criticised the exemption for so-called “reconversion to ancestral religion” as an attempt to privilege Hinduism while treating all other faiths as subordinate.
The statement also linked the passage of the bill with a spike in targeted violence. Since September 3, when the bill was reintroduced in the Assembly, at least ten incidents of attacks, harassment or arrests involving Christians have been reported across districts including Alwar, Hanumangarh, Dungarpur, Kotputli-Behror and Jaipur. The signatories alleged that police have largely sided with right-wing groups such as the Bajrang Dal and VHP, often refusing to file FIRs against them while arresting pastors and intimidating worshippers. Particularly troubling, they said, were repeated incidents in Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, within the Chief Minister’s own constituency.
The coalition announced a multi-pronged strategy to oppose the legislation, including meetings with the Governor, public rallies, inter-community dialogues, state-wide campaigns, signature and postcard drives, and legal challenges before the Supreme Court. They emphasised that the law would not withstand judicial scrutiny, citing both constitutional infirmities and legislative incompetence, as matters relating to religion and propagation fall within Union jurisdiction.
The statement concluded that the bill undermines India’s secular framework by criminalising the peaceful exercise of religious freedom and enabling majoritarian domination. The undersigned organisations included the Jaipur Christian Fellowship, Rajasthan Samagra Seva Sangh, PUCL, APCR Rajasthan, Rajasthan Buddhist Mahasangh, NFIW, AIDWA, Daman Pratirodh Andolan, Youth Buddhist Society of India, Jamaat-e-Islami Rajasthan, Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, SDPI Rajasthan, Rajasthan Nagrik Manch, Dalit–Muslim Ekta Manch, Welfare Party of India (Rajasthan) and the Ambedkarite Party of India.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Conversion of religion is not necessary; One can change one's opinions, views & beliefs and yet not convert one's religion. Conversion has many challenges, some for life & can be very dangerous. A scientific approach of Exploring Truth and Opting it is a Civil Right irrespective of religion

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

What Sister Nivedita understood about India that we have forgotten

By Harasankar Adhikari   In the idea of a “Vikshit Bharat,” many real problems—hunger, poverty, ill health, unemployment, and joblessness—are increasingly overshadowed by the religious contest between Hindu and Muslim fundamentalisms. This contest is often sponsored and patronised by political parties across the spectrum, whether openly Hindutva-oriented, Islamist, partisan, or self-proclaimed secular.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.