Skip to main content

Beyond freebies: How poor people's hidden contributions fund state coffers

By Prof. Hamentkumar Shah* 
A widespread impression in India, carefully cultivated by the wealthy, is that only the rich bear the nation’s tax burden, while the poor pay nothing. This is a falsehood, even a conspiracy, reinforced further by claims that governments provide everything to the poor free of cost. Whatever is distributed as subsidies or welfare is often disparagingly labeled as “freebies.” But is it really true that the poor do not pay taxes?
When GST concessions are announced, it is said that taxes on essential goods have been reduced or eliminated. This itself proves that such goods were already taxed and that the poor were indeed paying. Even when the final product is exempt, the machinery or raw materials used in its production carry duties such as GST or customs tax, and these costs are inevitably built into the price. The consumer, including the poor, ends up paying indirectly.
In reality, every rupee that the government earns through GST, customs duty, or excise duty includes contributions from the poor. When a poor man buys a shirt, the button on it may not carry tax, but the machinery used to produce it does, which raises the cost of the shirt. A family that erects a shack out of wood, plastic, cloth, or bricks is indirectly paying the taxes levied on those materials or on the machinery that produced them. A vegetable vendor who buys a cart pays for the taxes built into its wood, tires, and other fittings. Even a poor woman who pays a dentist two hundred rupees for tooth extraction contributes to government revenue because that fee includes taxes on the doctor’s income, on medical instruments, and on the clinic’s infrastructure.
GST was introduced in 2017–18, bringing the government ₹4.43 lakh crore in its first year. Except for the pandemic year, revenues have steadily grown, with an estimated ₹10.62 lakh crore last year and ₹11.78 lakh crore projected for the current year. In just seven years, GST revenue has more than doubled. From 2017–18 to 2024–25, total GST collections reached ₹57.37 lakh crore. Against this, recent tax reliefs amounting to ₹48,000 crore are negligible.
According to the 2025–26 Union Budget, the government’s total tax revenue will be about ₹42.70 lakh crore, of which ₹14.22 lakh crore will be transferred to states and the rest retained by the Centre. GST alone contributes about 18 percent of this revenue, customs 4 percent, and excise 5 percent, making indirect taxes together nearly 27 percent of government income. By contrast, direct taxes—income tax at 22 percent and corporate tax at 17 percent—together form 39 percent. But even corporate tax is effectively an indirect levy, since companies typically pass the burden on to consumers by adjusting prices.
Thus, nearly 44 percent of central government revenue comes from taxes that are borne directly or indirectly by ordinary consumers, including the poor. To claim that the poor pay nothing is misleading. In truth, even the poorest citizens contribute through both direct and hidden taxes. That is why the Constitution’s Directive Principles of State Policy do not merely justify subsidies for the poor but envision broader welfare measures as essential for justice and equality.
---
*Senior economist based in Ahmedabad 

Comments

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

What Sister Nivedita understood about India that we have forgotten

By Harasankar Adhikari   In the idea of a “Vikshit Bharat,” many real problems—hunger, poverty, ill health, unemployment, and joblessness—are increasingly overshadowed by the religious contest between Hindu and Muslim fundamentalisms. This contest is often sponsored and patronised by political parties across the spectrum, whether openly Hindutva-oriented, Islamist, partisan, or self-proclaimed secular.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.