Skip to main content

Behind the hype of GST reforms: Relief for citizens or windfall for corporates?

By Sunil Kumar* 
On September 22, 2025, the country implemented GST reform, being promoted as the “New Generation GST Reform.” Prime Minister Modi presented this reform to the people through his address to the nation from the Red Fort ramparts on September 21, 2025. The BJP and BJP-ruled state governments are celebrating this as the “GST Savings Festival” fortnight (September 22–29). All BJP MPs and ministers have been instructed to reach out to shopkeepers and people in markets and on the streets. But if this GST reform is truly a “savings festival,” then does that mean that since July 1, 2017, the country has been experiencing a “loot festival”? The figures confirm that under GST, a significant portion of the people’s hard-earned money has been taken away by the government and corporate elites.
Between July 1, 2017 and August 2025, ₹128 lakh crore has been collected through GST. In FY 2018–19, collections were ₹11.78 lakh crore, which rose to ₹22.08 lakh crore in FY 2024–25—nearly doubling in six years. This increase has come primarily through indirect extraction from the poor.
GST Revenue Collection by Year (₹ crore)
2017–18 (9 months): 7,40,650
2018–19: 11,77,368
2019–20: 12,22,116
2020–21: 11,36,805
2021–22: 14,83,291
2022–23: 18,07,680
2023–24: 20,18,249
2024–25: 22,08,861
Sources:
https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gross-net-gst-revenue-collections-month-march-2025.html
https://gstcouncil.gov.in/gst-revenue?page=1
According to Oxfam, 64.3% of GST collections come from the poorest 50% of Indians, while the richest 10% contribute only 3–4%. The middle 40% contribute around 33%. Meanwhile, 1% of Indians own 40.6% of the country’s wealth, the top 10% own 72%, and the poorest 50% own just 3%. This means those with the least assets are paying the most GST, while the wealthy contribute little. Unsurprisingly, corporate wealth has skyrocketed. In 2022, the income of India’s richest person rose by 46%, as confirmed by Oxfam.
The Finance Ministry informed Parliament that the 18% GST slab contributes about 75% of total GST revenue. This slab covers everyday goods like hair oil, toothpaste, ice cream, pasta, restaurant meals, and cinema tickets under ₹100. Opposition leaders therefore call it the “Gabbar Singh Tax.” But even this comparison is inaccurate, because Gabbar Singh looted the rich to give to the poor—whereas under GST, the poor are looted to benefit the rich. In truth, GST means: “Take from the poor, give to the rich”—a true “loot festival.”
The Reality After GST Implementation
When GST was introduced at midnight on July 1, 2017, the government claimed it would benefit the nation and the public. It promised to replace 15 central and state taxes with a single tax, charged only once, with lower slabs making goods cheaper.
In practice, the opposite occurred. Corporates recalculated prices using the maximum retail price (MRP) as the base for GST, or reduced product weights. The result was rampant inflation. For example:
- A two-wheeler costing ₹60,000 rose to ₹1,20,000.
- A refrigerator once ₹15,000 cost ₹25,000.
- Fortune oil selling at ₹80–90 per liter shot up to ₹170–180.
- A ₹2 packet of Parle-G biscuits during lockdown now costs ₹5.
Corporate profits soared like rockets while ordinary people struggled.
No Relief Despite Rate Cuts
Even after slab reductions, the prices of daily goods have not fallen. Yet some MPs claim that a ₹100 item now costs ₹40–45—a cruel joke on the people.
Ahead of revisions, companies raised prices, as in 2017. According to Navbharat Times (Sept 22, 2025), ghee prices rose by ₹30 per kg, toothpaste from ₹75 to ₹90, and Adani’s cement companies raised prices by ₹30–40 per bag. Old stocks are sold at old prices, while new stock is costlier. Toy dealer Rajiv Batra remarked that while some relief exists, the stress is greater—musical toys, for instance, now face 18% GST instead of 12%, making them more expensive.
As in 2017, confusion persists. Small traders remain troubled, selling at old rates while the government aggressively promotes claims of cheaper goods.
Between July 1, 2017 and July 13, 2022, GST slabs were amended 907 times. This shows GST was introduced without preparation and repeatedly altered to favor corporates.
Impact on Federalism and States’ Rights
With GST, states virtually lost their independent taxation powers. All decisions now rest with the GST Council, where the central government dominates. This has eroded the federal structure, with non-BJP states also alleging withholding of GST funds.
Ironically, Narendra Modi opposed GST as Gujarat Chief Minister, but as Prime Minister he introduced it at midnight. Modi often glorifies failures—as seen in demonetization or the sudden Covid lockdown. Similarly, under GST, public burdens and opposition criticism are packaged as “celebrations.”
The Modi government claims people saved ₹2 lakh crore due to slab cuts. But it does not explain how GST collections doubled from ₹11.78 lakh crore in 2018–19 to ₹22.08 lakh crore in 2024–25, or how corporate wealth rose at rocket speed, with one billionaire’s wealth growing by 46% in a year. Why have essential goods not become cheaper? Why not abolish GST entirely and tax corporates directly? These questions remain unanswered.
Thus, for the common people, this is not a “savings festival,” but a “loot festival.”

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.