Skip to main content

Defying blockade: Gaza Flotilla carries message of humanity - a voyage of resistance and hope

By Taroa Zúñiga, Vijay Prashad 

The Gaza Sumud Flotilla sails from Tunis toward the waters around Palestine. The word Sumud in Arabic means Resilience. It is the feeling at the heart of the hundreds of people from forty-four countries on the fifty boats that are in the Mediterranean Sea. One of these boats is carrying a group of women from around the world. On that boat is María ‘Marita’ Rodríguez, a Swedish and Chilean woman who lives in Stockholm. She spoke to us from her boat about her journey and why she was there in the first place.
The journey, Marita said, “has been unique”. There was a drone attack on the boats in Tunis harbour, but that is now behind them. They are looking forward to breaking the Israeli blockade. There are only six people on her boat. The three-member crew includes Anna (from Catalonia) who is a “wild woman with a heart of gold”, Anita (from Uruguay), “who always carries her mate tea under her arm and tells us stories”, and Irene (from Italy), “our sunshine who is always in good spirits”. The three participants include a businesswoman from Brunei and a nurse as well.Marita, is an activist whose father was executed during the military coup in Chile. “We are all normal people”, she said, “who cannot stand idly by when genocide is happening before our eyes”. The morale on the boats, Marita says, is high because the people on them “know that we are on the right side of history”.
Marita’s father, Rolando, was killed by the military dictatorship of General Augusto Pinochet in 1976. Marita did not know her father at all. That murder shaped her beliefs, she tells us, and shaped “the path I have chosen”. “I have lived longer than he was able to”, she says, “but he is still present in every act of solidarity that I carry out. When I see great movements do something to change the world”, she said, “I see him”. Indeed, she says her participation in the flotilla is in the memory of her father and “with my son’s smile in my heart”.
Israel has already made its intention clear with its assaults on all previous maritime attempts to break its stranglehold on the Palestinians in Gaza. These include Israel’s violent attack on the Mavi Marmara in 2010 (killing nine people), the Freedom Flotilla II in 2011, the Just Future for Palestine Flotilla 2018, and the Freedom Flotillas of 2023 and 2025. When asked about what she would anticipate from Israel, Marita said, “with them, you never know. What they have done before is board and hijack. That is one of the scenarios that could happen. But with more eyes on us, and if the governments of the world do what they should, we could reach Gaza, and from there, the states should enforce international treaties”. The Israeli foreign ministry has begun to call the Sumud Flotilla the “Hamas Flotilla” and to argue that this flotilla is “a jihadist initiative serving the terror group’s agenda”. Such a reckless statement is made to send a message that the Israeli government is willing to sink boats and kill people rather than to see this mission for what it is, namely, to deliver humanitarian aid. People like Marita are not motivated by hate or by jihad but by humanism and solidarity.
“I am part of this historic flotilla to Gaza because I cannot remain silent while genocide is taking place”, Marita told us. “Solidarity is not just a word, it demands action”. Her words echo from boat to boat. Everyone has a story for why they are there, but the real reason that motivates them is to create a humanitarian corridor and to ensure that the people in Gaza —amid an Israeli created famine— are able to get food and medicines delivered immediately. The United Nations Organisation for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said on 18 September that Israel has increased its barriers for aid: “Opportunities to support starving people are being systematically blocked. Every week, new restrictions are imposed”. UN Secretary General António Guterres said of the situation in Gaza, “It is a man-made disaster, a moral indictment —and a failure of humanity itself. Famine is not about food; it is the deliberate collapse of the systems needed for human survival”. The UN’s agency speaks in a passive voice, and Guterres talks about “man-made” but does not mention Israel. It is Israel that has produced this famine, and it is Israel that is preventing the flotilla from making landfall in Gaza and opening a humanitarian corridor.
Marita hopes that if the flotilla can break Israel’s blockade of Gaza, then perhaps states might take the initiative to send bigger ships to feed and treat the Palestinians of Gaza. Or, she says, “better yet”, the arrival of the flotilla might provoke states to put more pressure on Israel to cease the genocide. That is, however, unlikely. On 18 September, a resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza was put on the table of the UN Security Council by its ten non-permanent members (Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Pakistan, Panama, Republic of Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, and Somalia). The United States, however, vetoed the resolution. This was the sixth veto exercised by the United States to prevent an end to the genocide. After the vote, Pakistan’s ambassador Asim Ahmad said that this veto was “a dark moment in this chamber. The world is watching. The cries of children should pierce our hearts”. Algeria’s ambassador Amar Bendjama apologised to the Palestinian people: “Palestinian brothers, Palestinian sisters: forgive us”.
Meanwhile, Israeli tanks are moving toward Gaza City to try and clear out those who remain in the northern part of the Gaza Strip. Slaughter is imminent. Marita has a message for those who watched US deputy Middle East envoy Morgan Ortagus raise her hand to veto the resolution: “Don't let them stop you from talking about Gaza. Right now, Gaza City is being forcibly evacuated amid bombings. And everyone knows that there is no safe place in Gaza. That is why I ask you to organise yourselves and put pressure on your governments. Go on strike, use all the tools of active non-violence.”
---
This article was produced by Globetrotter. Taroa Zúñiga Silva is a writer and Spanish media coordinator for Globetrotter. She is the director of the publishing house La Trocha and a member of the Mecha cooperative, a project of the Ejército Comunicacional de Liberación. She is co-editor, along with Giordana García Sojo, of the book Venezuela, vórtice de la guerra del siglo XXI (Venezuela, vortex of the 21st-century war) (2020). Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor, and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest books are On Cuba: Reflections on 70 Years of Revolution and Struggle (with Noam Chomsky), Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism, and (also with Noam Chomsky) The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of U.S. Power

Comments

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

What Sister Nivedita understood about India that we have forgotten

By Harasankar Adhikari   In the idea of a “Vikshit Bharat,” many real problems—hunger, poverty, ill health, unemployment, and joblessness—are increasingly overshadowed by the religious contest between Hindu and Muslim fundamentalisms. This contest is often sponsored and patronised by political parties across the spectrum, whether openly Hindutva-oriented, Islamist, partisan, or self-proclaimed secular.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.