Skip to main content

This book highlights how failure of Communist-Social Democratic unity weakened fight against Nazis in Germany

By Harsh Thakor* 

T. Derbent’s book The German Communist Resistance, 1933-1945 examines how the German Communist Party (KPD) waged underground resistance against the Nazi regime, particularly between 1933 and 1935, despite severe repression, mass arrests, and forced changes in tactics and organization after 1935. It traces how the KPD’s structure was dismantled, with activists imprisoned, exiled, or forced to adopt different forms of protest, including the creation of illegal networks and participation in the Spanish Civil War.
When the KPD was banned, its paramilitary formations numbered more than 100,000 members, while the Antifa League had around 250,000 members. Under Nazi repression, activists who remained in Germany faced stark choices. Some abandoned the struggle, a few collaborated with the regime, but tens of thousands continued resistance. Though party structures collapsed repeatedly, clandestine organizations were quickly reorganized, dismantled, and rebuilt again.
The book narrates this cycle of repression and survival, bringing into focus a resistance often obscured in mainstream history. Nazi repression was swift, with leaders arrested and detained in concentration camps and thousands of cadres forced into exile to fight fascism abroad.
Derbent highlights networks such as that of Robert Uhrig, which organized factory-based resistance, and the Herbert Baum group, active in producing illegal leaflets and attacking Nazi propaganda in 1936. The Gestapo labeled several such networks the “Red Orchestra,” including those led by Arvid Harnack and Harro Schulze-Boysen, which distributed information and supported persecuted individuals.
The book also situates communist resistance alongside other forms, including the White Rose group and anti-Hitler factions among the bourgeoisie and aristocracy, such as the Kreisau Circle and the July 20, 1944 conspirators. Derbent argues, however, that comparing communist resistance to Christian or socialist efforts is misleading, since the latter were undertaken by individuals or small networks, while the communists embraced propaganda, sabotage, guerrilla warfare, espionage, union struggles, and armed resistance across Germany, in camps and in the army, from the beginning to the end of the Third Reich.
The book also reflects on the failure to establish a united front with the Social Democratic Party (SPD). Derbent does not dwell on the Stalinization of the Comintern, which often imposed Moscow’s priorities on European struggles, but points to external factors and the antagonism between the SPD and KPD. The “social fascist” line is presented as justified, since social democrats at times used the state apparatus to repress communist organizing. This failure to unite, he argues, weakened the fight against Nazism.
Despite repression, KPD organizations continued clandestine action, repeatedly dismantled and rebuilt as militants were imprisoned, executed, or forced into exile. They organized propaganda campaigns, supported strikes, carried out sabotage of the war industry, and resisted within the army and concentration camps. Derbent also highlights the international role of communists in exile, including their involvement in the Spanish Civil War. He presents communist resistance as consistent and determined, even during the German-Soviet non-aggression pact, maintaining military resistance rather than political compromise.
The book emphasizes the scale of sabotage against Nazi war production, and challenges the Western consensus that places communism and fascism as equivalent totalitarianisms. Derbent suggests that just as in the past, liberal and progressive but anti-communist blocs today often compromise with far-right forces to preserve capitalist hegemony. He diagnoses fascism as a social movement with a mass base, driven by authoritarian visions of collective rebirth, that undermines liberal institutions while reinforcing economic and social hierarchies. In this framework, militant antifascism is engaged in a three-way fight against insurgent far-right movements and bourgeois democracy.
Derbent concludes that fascism cannot be permanently defeated without confronting the conditions that give rise to it—capitalism, white supremacy, and in contexts like North America, settler-colonialism.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.