This book highlights how failure of Communist-Social Democratic unity weakened fight against Nazis in Germany

By Harsh Thakor*
T. Derbent’s book The German Communist Resistance, 1933-1945 examines how the German Communist Party (KPD) waged underground resistance against the Nazi regime, particularly between 1933 and 1935, despite severe repression, mass arrests, and forced changes in tactics and organization after 1935. It traces how the KPD’s structure was dismantled, with activists imprisoned, exiled, or forced to adopt different forms of protest, including the creation of illegal networks and participation in the Spanish Civil War.
When the KPD was banned, its paramilitary formations numbered more than 100,000 members, while the Antifa League had around 250,000 members. Under Nazi repression, activists who remained in Germany faced stark choices. Some abandoned the struggle, a few collaborated with the regime, but tens of thousands continued resistance. Though party structures collapsed repeatedly, clandestine organizations were quickly reorganized, dismantled, and rebuilt again.
The book narrates this cycle of repression and survival, bringing into focus a resistance often obscured in mainstream history. Nazi repression was swift, with leaders arrested and detained in concentration camps and thousands of cadres forced into exile to fight fascism abroad.
Derbent highlights networks such as that of Robert Uhrig, which organized factory-based resistance, and the Herbert Baum group, active in producing illegal leaflets and attacking Nazi propaganda in 1936. The Gestapo labeled several such networks the “Red Orchestra,” including those led by Arvid Harnack and Harro Schulze-Boysen, which distributed information and supported persecuted individuals.
The book also situates communist resistance alongside other forms, including the White Rose group and anti-Hitler factions among the bourgeoisie and aristocracy, such as the Kreisau Circle and the July 20, 1944 conspirators. Derbent argues, however, that comparing communist resistance to Christian or socialist efforts is misleading, since the latter were undertaken by individuals or small networks, while the communists embraced propaganda, sabotage, guerrilla warfare, espionage, union struggles, and armed resistance across Germany, in camps and in the army, from the beginning to the end of the Third Reich.
The book also reflects on the failure to establish a united front with the Social Democratic Party (SPD). Derbent does not dwell on the Stalinization of the Comintern, which often imposed Moscow’s priorities on European struggles, but points to external factors and the antagonism between the SPD and KPD. The “social fascist” line is presented as justified, since social democrats at times used the state apparatus to repress communist organizing. This failure to unite, he argues, weakened the fight against Nazism.
Despite repression, KPD organizations continued clandestine action, repeatedly dismantled and rebuilt as militants were imprisoned, executed, or forced into exile. They organized propaganda campaigns, supported strikes, carried out sabotage of the war industry, and resisted within the army and concentration camps. Derbent also highlights the international role of communists in exile, including their involvement in the Spanish Civil War. He presents communist resistance as consistent and determined, even during the German-Soviet non-aggression pact, maintaining military resistance rather than political compromise.
The book emphasizes the scale of sabotage against Nazi war production, and challenges the Western consensus that places communism and fascism as equivalent totalitarianisms. Derbent suggests that just as in the past, liberal and progressive but anti-communist blocs today often compromise with far-right forces to preserve capitalist hegemony. He diagnoses fascism as a social movement with a mass base, driven by authoritarian visions of collective rebirth, that undermines liberal institutions while reinforcing economic and social hierarchies. In this framework, militant antifascism is engaged in a three-way fight against insurgent far-right movements and bourgeois democracy.
Derbent concludes that fascism cannot be permanently defeated without confronting the conditions that give rise to it—capitalism, white supremacy, and in contexts like North America, settler-colonialism.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman* The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."

Search This Blog