Citizenship row: Legal initiative launched for comprehensive review of Assam NRC

By Nava Thakuria*

The people of Assam are closely watching the Supreme Court’s recent decision to admit a petition seeking a comprehensive and time-bound re-verification of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) updated in the state between 2014 and 2019. On 22 August 2025, the apex court issued notices to the Union government, the Assam government, the current NRC coordinator, and the Registrar General of India after receiving a writ petition filed by retired IAS officer Hitesh Devsarma. The plea seeks an error-free NRC and reflects ongoing concerns about the exercise.

The NRC, first prepared in 1951, was updated in Assam under Supreme Court monitoring following the 1985 Assam Accord, which fixed 25 March 1971 as the cut-off date for detecting undocumented migrants. The process was initiated after a PIL by Assam Public Works. Over 50,000 government employees and nearly 6,000 temporary workers were engaged in the exercise, with expenditure reportedly crossing Rs 1,600 crore. A draft list was published in July 2018, followed by a supplementary list in August 2019, excluding 19 lakh out of 3.3 crore applicants. However, the list has yet to be formally notified by the Registrar General of India.

The process has been marred by allegations of irregularities. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), in its 2020 report, pointed to financial irregularities of over Rs 260 crore and recommended action against officials and contractors, including the system integrator Wipro. Devsarma, who served as NRC coordinator after 2019, also raised concerns about corruption, procedural lapses, and the inclusion of ineligible names. He has sought investigations by agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate and the National Investigation Agency. Several complaints have been filed, though only one has been formally registered so far, following a court directive.

Political leaders too have expressed reservations. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has called the list “faulty” and argued for corrective measures, stating that the indigenous population of Assam deserves a credible and error-free register. Citizen forums such as the Patriotic People’s Front Assam have echoed these demands and sought fair investigations into corruption allegations, including alleged wage deprivations faced by temporary data entry workers.

At the same time, a section of civil society has argued against further delays, noting that the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Clause 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which recognizes the 1971 cut-off date. They contend that the NRC was prepared in line with this legal framework and should be implemented without re-verification.

Media and public discourse on the issue remain divided. While some groups have highlighted procedural flaws and alleged malpractices, others have emphasized the importance of finalizing the NRC to provide closure to a long and complex process.

The Supreme Court’s response to the petition and the subsequent actions by state and central authorities will shape the future of the NRC in Assam. For now, the debate continues over whether the existing list should be finalized as it stands or subjected to further verification to ensure its accuracy and credibility.

---

*Senior journalist based in Guwahati

Comments

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman* The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor* This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."

Search This Blog