Skip to main content

Indian corporations accused of complicity in Gaza genocide, report finds

By Jag Jivan 
A new report by the advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has alleged that Indian corporations, both private and state-owned, are entwined with Israel’s economy of occupation and military campaigns in Gaza. Titled Profit and Genocide: Indian Investments in Israel, the report highlights the role of Indian capital in sectors ranging from defense and technology to agriculture and infrastructure, directly linking it to activities described as sustaining Israel’s military operations and settler-colonial practices.
The report also underscores Israel’s investments in India, noting that bilateral trade ties have continued and even strengthened during the ongoing conflict. Earlier this month, the Indian government signed a Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) with Israel, which the CFA says signals tacit complicity in the violence against Palestinians.
Among the key findings, India accounted for 40–45% of Israel’s total arms exports between 2016 and 2021, making it one of Israel’s largest defense clients. Adani-Elbit Advanced Systems India Ltd in Hyderabad manufactures the Hermes 900 drone, reportedly used by the Israeli military in Gaza for surveillance and targeted strikes. Adani Ports’ $1.18 billion acquisition of Haifa links Indian capital to Israel’s naval and military logistics, including its submarine fleet.
Indian technology giants such as Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Infosys, and Reliance Jio are tied to Israeli digital infrastructure. TCS, for example, is involved in Project Nimbus, a cloud initiative that critics say enables mass surveillance and predictive policing of Palestinians. In agriculture, Jain Irrigation’s subsidiary NaanDanJain supplies irrigation systems to Israeli settlements in the West Bank and Golan Heights. The company has also merged parts of its business with Rivulis, linked to Israel’s military and prison industries.
The report details collaboration in water projects, including Indian partnerships with Mekorot, Israel’s national water company, accused of weaponizing water in Gaza. In 2023, about 42,000 Indian construction and nursing workers were recruited to Israel, filling jobs previously held by Palestinians amid suspension of Palestinian work permits.
Hajira Puthige, author of the report, emphasized the urgency of addressing India’s economic entanglements with Israel, stating that these investments “indirectly sustain and legitimize violence against civilians” and reveal “troubling complicity that undermines global calls for accountability and peace.”
Joe Athialy, Executive Director of CFA, noted that over 65,000 people have been killed in Gaza since the conflict escalated, including more than 20,000 children. “Indian government and Indian corporations can no longer ignore the ongoing war against humanity and should stop any business or trade with Israel until the genocide is stopped,” he said.
The report calls on Indian policymakers and corporations to reassess their partnerships with Israel and align with principles of justice, humanity, and international law.

Comments

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

What Sister Nivedita understood about India that we have forgotten

By Harasankar Adhikari   In the idea of a “Vikshit Bharat,” many real problems—hunger, poverty, ill health, unemployment, and joblessness—are increasingly overshadowed by the religious contest between Hindu and Muslim fundamentalisms. This contest is often sponsored and patronised by political parties across the spectrum, whether openly Hindutva-oriented, Islamist, partisan, or self-proclaimed secular.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.