Skip to main content

Allegations of Vote Chori raise demands for independent investigation

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  
Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, addressing the media on September 19, 2025, reiterated his allegation of large-scale “vote theft” in India. He criticized Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, saying the Election Commission (EC) was not fulfilling its constitutional duty. Gandhi cited instances from Karnataka and Maharashtra, claiming that voter names were deleted or added fraudulently.
According to Gandhi, in the Aland assembly constituency of Kalburgi district, around 6,000 names were allegedly removed from the voters’ list ahead of the 2023 Karnataka Assembly elections. He said the deletions disproportionately affected Congress strongholds. Following complaints, the Election Commission reviewed the matter, restored several names, and an FIR was filed by the Electoral Registration Officer. The Karnataka CID later investigated the case, reporting that fake names had been used to file deletion requests. The CID sought technical details from the Election Commission, including IP addresses, OTP trails, and mobile numbers linked to the objections.
Gandhi alleged that similar practices had occurred in Maharashtra’s Rajura constituency, where over 6,800 names were added in what he described as a fraudulent manner. He claimed such incidents had also taken place in Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Bihar. In a post on X, Gandhi said the alleged process of voter deletion was systematic and technology-driven.
This was Gandhi’s third press conference on the issue in two months. On August 7, 2025, he first alleged that a coordinated “vote theft” operation was underway, which he attributed to a wider network influencing elections nationwide. He described two primary methods of malpractice: the addition of fictitious names and the deletion of legitimate voters.
The Election Commission has rejected Gandhi’s allegations as “incorrect and baseless.” It stated that no individual can delete names online, as suggested, and emphasized its independent role in maintaining electoral rolls. The Commission asked Gandhi to submit an affidavit substantiating his claims or issue a public apology.
Gandhi, however, has maintained that the EC should cooperate with the Karnataka CID investigation and provide the requested data. He argued that transparency is necessary to ensure public confidence in the electoral process.
The controversy highlights ongoing tensions between the Opposition and the Election Commission regarding the integrity of electoral rolls. While Gandhi has called for an independent investigation, the EC has denied wrongdoing. The matter remains under scrutiny, with further developments likely depending on the Karnataka CID probe.
---
*Journalist based in Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan *  Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative   The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.  

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.