Food sovereignty movement condemns arrest of Wangchuck, demands immediate release

By A Representative

India’s food sovereignty movement has strongly condemned the arrest of environmental and local governance activist Sonam Wangchuck, demanding his immediate and unconditional release along with others detained in Ladakh.

In a joint statement endorsed by a wide cross-section of activists, academics, farmers, researchers and citizens, the signatories said it was “a cruel joke” that a person who has been working for food sovereignty, self-reliance and environmental protection is being labelled anti-national. They argued that Wangchuck’s advocacy for sustainable food systems, local governance, and ecological protection aligns directly with the idea of atma nirbharata promoted by the government itself.

The statement recalled Wangchuck’s role in campaigns such as the boycott of Chinese products and expressed concern that his peaceful efforts are now being criminalised. It also drew parallels with the government’s handling of the 2020–21 farmers’ protests, accusing it of failing to engage in meaningful dialogue and instead resorting to repression.

The movement condemned both the violence against political party offices and vehicles on September 24, as well as the police firing on protesters that resulted in deaths. It rejected the government’s attempt to hold Wangchuck responsible for the violence, pointing out that he had been publicly appealing for peace at the time.

“We expect our governments to be responsive and sympathetic to the just demands of citizens, without inordinate and unjustifiable delays,” the statement said, adding that criticising the government should not be equated with being anti-national.

The food sovereignty network demanded the immediate release of Wangchuck and five others charged under the National Security Act, along with 44 others arrested in connection with the September 24 protests. It also called upon the Government of India to resume dialogue with Ladakhi representatives and address their demands for statehood and stronger local governance.

To Sonam Wangchuk: 'Will undertake 70 hour solidarity fast in Gujarat'

By Martin Macwan * Dear Colleague Sonam Wangchuk, I have never met you personally. I wrote a short article at the time of your arrest. Your work correctly introduces you. There is truth in your words. You have embarked on a fast, following the footsteps of Gandhiji. Your intention is to make people think. Your demand is reasonable; I believe that the resignation of a single education minister will not improve the state of education in India. However, the question you have raised is extremely important for the future generation of the marginalized. Education is the key to power, development, and progress, which empowers a citizen.

US civil society coalition slams Hudson Institute for hosting RSS leaders

By A Representative The Hudson Institute ’s “New India Conference,” held on April 23, featured senior figures from India’s ruling political ecosystem, including RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale and BJP foreign affairs head Vijay Chauthaiwale . The event also included U.S. officials and former diplomats such as Kurt Campbell, Kenneth Juster, and Nisha Biswal, alongside India’s Ambassador to the U.S., Vinay Kwatra.

Remembering Rampur ka Tiraha: State violence and the birth of Uttarakhand’s struggle

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* In the turbulent political landscape of the early 1990s, India witnessed events that reshaped its social and regional equations. After the Babri Masjid demolition in 1992, Uttar Pradesh politics shifted dramatically, bringing the Samajwadi Party–Bahujan Samaj Party coalition to power in 1993 under Mulayam Singh Yadav. But the partnership was uneasy. Mulayam was never entirely comfortable playing the “Mandal card.” While Kanshi Ram and the BSP had consistently demanded the implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, Mulayam hesitated, wary of how the move might play out.

Counterview

Search This Blog