Skip to main content

SC flags govt inaction as Central, State Information Commissions remain paralyzed

By A Representative 
On September 26, the Supreme Court heard a case concerning the non-appointment of information commissioners at the Central Information Commission (CIC) and several State Information Commissions. The matter was mentioned before a bench comprising Justice Suryakant and Justice Bagchi.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioners, highlighted that the CIC currently has no Chief Information Commissioner and only two of the ten sanctioned posts of information commissioners are filled. He noted that in a previous hearing on January 7, 2025, the Supreme Court had directed the Union of India to file an affidavit outlining a timeline for filling the eight vacant posts, which had been advertised in August 2024. The government had indicated that appointments would be completed within three months, by April 2025. However, no appointments have been made so far.
The petitioners also pointed out the backlog at the CIC, which has more than 26,800 pending appeals and complaints, with cases taking over a year to be heard.
At the state level, the Supreme Court noted that the Jharkhand State Information Commission has remained non-functional since May 2020. In January 2025, the Court had issued time-bound directions for its revival. Owing to the absence of a Leader of Opposition in the Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha, the Court had directed the largest opposition party, BJP, to nominate a member to the Selection Committee specifically for selecting the Chief and other information commissioners, with a timeline of nine weeks for completion.
The matter has now been listed for further hearing on October 27, 2025.
The petitioners in the case (Miscellaneous Application 1979 of 2019) include Anjali Bhardwaj, Commodore Lokesh Batra (Retd), and Amrita Johri, represented by advocates Prashant Bhushan and Rahul Gupta.

Comments

TRENDING

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By  A  Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”