Skip to main content

Self-obsessed? From peace promises to war rhetoric: Trump at the United Nations

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
Donald Trump’s speech at the United Nations was among the most disappointing of its kind, making him appear delusional, self-obsessed, and dictatorial. It is ironic that leaders often labeled as “dictators” sometimes act with greater responsibility than such self-absorbed figures. Trump’s words suggested that he may turn reckless if global affairs do not move according to his will. Meanwhile, the military–industrial complex, which has long shaped U.S. foreign policy, remains powerful, and claims of its dismantling have proved illusory.
The world needs responsible leadership from powerful countries. In seeking to weaken others, America risks inflicting harm on itself—a process already underway. The consequences of narcissistic leadership affect every nation. Trump was elected partly on the promise of peace and of preventing escalation toward a global conflict, which many feared under Joe Biden’s administration. Yet, it is now evident that Washington aims to control global energy markets and sustain its economy through war-driven policies.
The Ukraine war could have been prevented if the U.S. and Europe had acted honestly and prioritized peace. Instead, their strategy appears to be to bleed Russia and fragment it—a goal Trump’s speech seemed to reinforce. To think Ukraine is winning is unrealistic; it is struggling even to mobilize enough fighters. For the U.S., however, the war sustains a profitable arms industry, with weapons sales to Europe ensuring the conflict drags on.
The Putin–Trump summit once raised hopes for reconciliation, but neither Moscow nor Washington will sacrifice national interests. Believing that Trump’s rise to power or symbolic meetings could resolve the crisis was always naïve. The American establishment has shown little interest in serious negotiations, focusing instead on manipulating events to serve its business and strategic interests. Unlike the Iraq War era—when Russia was weakened and China had yet to rise—today’s geopolitical reality is different. Russia is militarily resurgent, and China is an established global power. Moscow is pursuing its goals in Ukraine with determination, regardless of Western media narratives.
This war continues to distort the global economy. Trump’s open support for Ukraine and Europe ultimately benefits Russia, which will use the time to consolidate gains and annex more territory. His UN speech, rather than strengthening the U.S., risks further isolating it from the Global South, even as it cements ties with Europe. Yet, the belief that Russia or Vladimir Putin stand isolated is a misreading of global opinion. Despite Western efforts, Russia remains influential and respected in many parts of the world.
The world does not end because Washington or its allies refuse to recognize realities. Countries and people will chart their own paths. Such arrogance, embodied in Trump’s UN address, will only deepen the United States’ isolation in an international landscape that has already changed.
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

What Sister Nivedita understood about India that we have forgotten

By Harasankar Adhikari   In the idea of a “Vikshit Bharat,” many real problems—hunger, poverty, ill health, unemployment, and joblessness—are increasingly overshadowed by the religious contest between Hindu and Muslim fundamentalisms. This contest is often sponsored and patronised by political parties across the spectrum, whether openly Hindutva-oriented, Islamist, partisan, or self-proclaimed secular.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.