Skip to main content

From unity to propaganda: When leaders address the nation but ignore the people

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
The lineage of monarchical practices in political communication—used to convey authority and dominance—was normalized in American democracy through traditions such as addressing the nation, presidential inaugural speeches, and the State of the Union address. These forms of political communication have since become universal practices, adopted by leaders in many countries around the world. Idealist leaders often use such occasions to unify people, highlight achievements, address challenges, and set goals for the nation’s future. Progressive leaders, meanwhile, seize these opportunities to empower citizens and promote values such as secularism, science, and solidarity, thereby strengthening democracy and advancing citizenship rights. These ceremonial forms of political communication serve as crucial milestones, shaping national agendas and laying the foundation for a progressive present and a collective future.
However, populist, authoritarian, and hardline leaders often use these occasions as tools of narcissistic propaganda—a display of power, personal glory, and division. They exploit social, religious, political, economic, and cultural fault lines to shift blame and outsource their failures onto others. Such leaders consistently use public communication strategies to conceal their shortcomings and divert attention from the everyday struggles of working people. For them and their parties, these occasions become instruments to manipulate the masses in pursuit of political and economic self-interest, while governing ruthlessly in the name of patriotism and territorial nationalism. Ultimately, these practices marginalize citizens, erode democracy, weaken everyday aspirations, and diminish trust in the state, governments, ruling parties, and political leadership.
Conservative leaders and their political parties operating within market-driven democracies use communication strategies to manipulate voters’ minds during elections. Their goal is to capture state power, advance regressive agendas, and safeguard the interests of capitalist markets. In such contexts, governance systematically undermines the working population while privileging the rich and powerful. Populist and authoritarian leaders, in particular, exploit the practice of addressing the nation to focus on abstract yet emotionally charged issues—such as migration, Muslims, terrorism, sovereignty, religion, and national culture. These narratives distract citizens from their everyday struggles and fundamental needs for survival and aspirations for growth.
During the era of liberalization, privatization, and globalization, democracies were severely undermined by capitalist market forces, which forged alliances with undemocratic and authoritarian leaders and parties. These developments eroded the conditions necessary for deepening democracy. Political communication became a tool to normalize illiberal forces within society, territorializing, deterritorializing, and reterritorializing populations according to the shifting needs of capital. The alliance between capitalism and authoritarian political leadership frequently deploys aggressive nationalism to justify wars and conflicts. Such strategies serve to stabilize capitalism and its relentless processes of accumulation.
The economic, political, and social marginalization created by capitalism has forced working people to migrate, either within their own countries or abroad, while imperialist conflicts and resource wars have turned many into refugees and destitute populations. These forced migrants are often used as pawns in political debates, deployed to manipulate public opinion and conceal the failures of conservative politics and capitalist economies.
In recent years, the everyday needs of the people—their empowerment, and their progress along the path of secularism, science, peace, and prosperity—have largely disappeared from political leadership’s addresses to the nation. These speeches have become strategies to speak at the people rather than for them. Instead of reflecting citizens’ concerns and lived realities, they often ignore those concerns in the name of patriotism, nationalism, and notions of racial or religious purity, all in pursuit of dominance and control.
“Politics sans people,” “economy sans labour,” “work sans workers’ interests,” “religion sans spiritual solidarity,” and “culture sans collectivity” represent five pillars of contemporary capitalism and its political environment, which undermine democracy, secularism, and citizens’ rights in the relentless pursuit of profit. Political communication today is often used by leaders to advance the strategies of capitalism, reinforcing its hierarchical and exploitative pyramid of wealth and power.
Digital capitalism and its platform economy have reignited divisive political propaganda, undermining the unity of working people. Political leaders, in collaboration with their capitalist allies, exploit these digital platforms to accelerate profit—often at the expense of people and their communities by promoting exclusionary projects. Therefore, it is crucial to listen carefully to leaders’ addresses to the nation, in order to discern which politics truly serve the working masses and to challenge propaganda across platforms. The hollowness of such political discourse—promoted by leaders in the name of “addressing the nation” and “national interests” while forgetting the people—must be exposed. Only then can democracy be reclaimed in a way that genuinely serves both the people and the planet.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria*  As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.