Skip to main content

From unity to propaganda: When leaders address the nation but ignore the people

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
The lineage of monarchical practices in political communication—used to convey authority and dominance—was normalized in American democracy through traditions such as addressing the nation, presidential inaugural speeches, and the State of the Union address. These forms of political communication have since become universal practices, adopted by leaders in many countries around the world. Idealist leaders often use such occasions to unify people, highlight achievements, address challenges, and set goals for the nation’s future. Progressive leaders, meanwhile, seize these opportunities to empower citizens and promote values such as secularism, science, and solidarity, thereby strengthening democracy and advancing citizenship rights. These ceremonial forms of political communication serve as crucial milestones, shaping national agendas and laying the foundation for a progressive present and a collective future.
However, populist, authoritarian, and hardline leaders often use these occasions as tools of narcissistic propaganda—a display of power, personal glory, and division. They exploit social, religious, political, economic, and cultural fault lines to shift blame and outsource their failures onto others. Such leaders consistently use public communication strategies to conceal their shortcomings and divert attention from the everyday struggles of working people. For them and their parties, these occasions become instruments to manipulate the masses in pursuit of political and economic self-interest, while governing ruthlessly in the name of patriotism and territorial nationalism. Ultimately, these practices marginalize citizens, erode democracy, weaken everyday aspirations, and diminish trust in the state, governments, ruling parties, and political leadership.
Conservative leaders and their political parties operating within market-driven democracies use communication strategies to manipulate voters’ minds during elections. Their goal is to capture state power, advance regressive agendas, and safeguard the interests of capitalist markets. In such contexts, governance systematically undermines the working population while privileging the rich and powerful. Populist and authoritarian leaders, in particular, exploit the practice of addressing the nation to focus on abstract yet emotionally charged issues—such as migration, Muslims, terrorism, sovereignty, religion, and national culture. These narratives distract citizens from their everyday struggles and fundamental needs for survival and aspirations for growth.
During the era of liberalization, privatization, and globalization, democracies were severely undermined by capitalist market forces, which forged alliances with undemocratic and authoritarian leaders and parties. These developments eroded the conditions necessary for deepening democracy. Political communication became a tool to normalize illiberal forces within society, territorializing, deterritorializing, and reterritorializing populations according to the shifting needs of capital. The alliance between capitalism and authoritarian political leadership frequently deploys aggressive nationalism to justify wars and conflicts. Such strategies serve to stabilize capitalism and its relentless processes of accumulation.
The economic, political, and social marginalization created by capitalism has forced working people to migrate, either within their own countries or abroad, while imperialist conflicts and resource wars have turned many into refugees and destitute populations. These forced migrants are often used as pawns in political debates, deployed to manipulate public opinion and conceal the failures of conservative politics and capitalist economies.
In recent years, the everyday needs of the people—their empowerment, and their progress along the path of secularism, science, peace, and prosperity—have largely disappeared from political leadership’s addresses to the nation. These speeches have become strategies to speak at the people rather than for them. Instead of reflecting citizens’ concerns and lived realities, they often ignore those concerns in the name of patriotism, nationalism, and notions of racial or religious purity, all in pursuit of dominance and control.
“Politics sans people,” “economy sans labour,” “work sans workers’ interests,” “religion sans spiritual solidarity,” and “culture sans collectivity” represent five pillars of contemporary capitalism and its political environment, which undermine democracy, secularism, and citizens’ rights in the relentless pursuit of profit. Political communication today is often used by leaders to advance the strategies of capitalism, reinforcing its hierarchical and exploitative pyramid of wealth and power.
Digital capitalism and its platform economy have reignited divisive political propaganda, undermining the unity of working people. Political leaders, in collaboration with their capitalist allies, exploit these digital platforms to accelerate profit—often at the expense of people and their communities by promoting exclusionary projects. Therefore, it is crucial to listen carefully to leaders’ addresses to the nation, in order to discern which politics truly serve the working masses and to challenge propaganda across platforms. The hollowness of such political discourse—promoted by leaders in the name of “addressing the nation” and “national interests” while forgetting the people—must be exposed. Only then can democracy be reclaimed in a way that genuinely serves both the people and the planet.

Comments

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

What Sister Nivedita understood about India that we have forgotten

By Harasankar Adhikari   In the idea of a “Vikshit Bharat,” many real problems—hunger, poverty, ill health, unemployment, and joblessness—are increasingly overshadowed by the religious contest between Hindu and Muslim fundamentalisms. This contest is often sponsored and patronised by political parties across the spectrum, whether openly Hindutva-oriented, Islamist, partisan, or self-proclaimed secular.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.